[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1760973310633.jpeg (23.87 KB, 377x530, IMG_3859.jpeg)

 

If fascisms is capitalist response to a mass organized communist movement, and Trump is arguably a fascist and pushing for fascism, where is the organized communist movement of our day?

>If fascisms is capitalist response to a mass organized communist movement
It isnt. Like even back in Italy, by 1922 the possibility of communist revolution has already been quenched through social-democratic reforms.

>If fascisms is capitalist response to a mass organized communist movement
It's not. As >>2528262 points out.

You don't need fascists to kill communists. Liberals will do just fine.

>>2528262
>>2528265
Then what‘s fascism?

>>2528311
Fascism is Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy and Fascist Spain.

Analysis of fascism becomes needlessly complex because people remove it from it's historic context in order to create a false unscientific pan-historical fascism.

Fascism no longer exists in 2025. There are far right governments that do indeed still perform genocides and ethnic cleansing and preach racial superiority. They are what they actually are - far-right governments. No further deep analysis is needed. They exist not purely because of the threat of communism, they exist because of multiple reasons. Far right ideas are popular in some places. Some people want their enemies to be genocides and ethnically cleansed. Some people want a strong government that exists as a big daddy who will protect them from the evil enemies. And the ruling classes either have the same ideas, or they might be opportunistically using these sentiments for their own end.

So you see. Nothing here is complicated, and ther e is no need for further analysis.

>>2528334
>Analysis of fascism becomes needlessly complex because people remove it from it's historic context in order to create a false unscientific pan-historical fascism.
>nazi germany
>fascist spain
I mean all these are only generally united by palegentic ultranationalism, so if you want to go this vague of a defintion then a lot of modern states are fascist

>>2528311
I thinks Eco Umberto's text puts it pretty well. Some points I find disputable, but the most important part is
>ascism became an all-purpose term because one can eliminate from a fascist regime one or more features, and it will still be recognizable as fascist. Take away imperialism from fascism and you still have Franco and Salazar. Take away colonialism and you still have the Balkan fascism of the Ustashes. Add to the Italian fascism a radical anti-capitalism (which never much fascinated ᴉuᴉlossnW) and you have Ezra Pound. Add a cult of Celtic mythology and the Grail mysticism (completely alien to official fascism) and you have one of the most respected fascist gurus, Julius Evola.

So there is no point in making a rigid all-encompassing definition, but there is a list of traits which might describe this or that government/ideology/person to various degrees.
On the topic of current US government, I think at this point its pretty clear that mask of liberal democracy is off. More fascist than most agreed upon fascist regimes I would say, completely unbound by any pretenses of socialism or liberalism, as many fascist regimes were. The base is driven by pure cultural resentment, like even the classical scapegoating ala "you cant get job because immigrants are stealing them" seems to be barely there, there is just no effort to even pretend anything you do will improve lives of your supporters.

>>2528334
>and there is no need for further analysis
<they exist because of multiple reasons
<Far right ideas are popular in some places.
<Some people want their enemies to be genocides and ethnically cleansed.
<Some people want a strong government that exists as a big daddy who will protect them from the evil enemies
<And the ruling classes either have the same ideas, or they might be opportunistically using these sentiments for their own end.
It seems there is actually quite a lot to analyse here anon.

>>2528259
>If fascisms is capitalist response to a mass organized communist movement
Well sure, there was fear of Bolshevism, but there were other things going on too. I think fascists were afraid of a lot of things. They were also afraid of liberalism. They viewed it as weak and decadent.

>and Trump is arguably a fascist and pushing for fascism, where is the organized communist movement of our day?

I think you can look at Trump and the fascists as expressions of a reactionary potentiality in their time. But there are some differences. Fascist rallies were really extreme BTW. They went for hyper-coreographed, mass military-style rallies and formations with torches and flags to make people feel really powerful and to awe/intimidate people.


We have the exact same thread about fascism every day and no one learns anything after 400 replies.

Fascism is not "capitalist response to a mass organized communist movement"

Fascism is a populist reactionary response to the failure of the imperialist/capitalist system.

>>2528311
a rejection of both elite society and worker society

>>2528386
Oh my fucking god the definitions of fascism just get stupider and stupider.

>>2528404
that's true though

>>2528419
>pictured: fascist

forgot vid
>>2528311
Fascism is structural i.e. >>2528334 is wrong. It's what happens when national capital (through the national bourgeois) finds it can only survive and thrive through violent expansion and dropping any liberal universalist enlightenment pretenses. It's a crossing of the rubicon. A purely bourgeois dictatorship as the "highest" stage of capitalism. A bit like what absolutism is to 'feudalism'.
Lenin talked about Imperialism as driving the capitalist great powers to world war. And he was right. But the kind of fascism which became recognized in the interwar period was already present in pre-war Germany, and many of the same capitalists who profited from the first world war were also involved in its sequel.
>>2528350
The issue with umberto eco is that he looks at fascism purely 'ideologically', which is fine as far as it might help explain why people decide to join the brown shirts instead of a militant trade union, but it doesn't explain how fascism changes the bourgeois state structurally. For example, how the "military-industrial complex" becomes inseparable from the rest of the "economy".
Absolutism wasn't the end of feudalism, but it did bring changes to how these states were governed and operated.

See vidrel. I also recommend checking out the channel itself as it covers how fascism expressed itself in Poland, Italy, Japan and Germany at the time. I do disagree with Pinochet being fascist. Instead, I think Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi Ba'ath party at the time is a far better example of a post-war Fascist dictatorship. And liberals are right when they argue the US is turning into a fascist dictatorship.

>>2528422
uh, there's no society there at all lol. the class struggle hasn't begun yet

>>2528427
No no no. Fascism, is like, when, like, you use rhetoric that appeals to people, and, fascism is when you have the masculine personality and it's when aesthetics aren't wholesome. Fascism is just when a leader has more charisma than Joe Brandon and the other Democrats. It's when people feel like society can improve (this is palingenesis and is EVIL).
Fascism has nothing to do with the bourgoeisie it's when people dislike the free market actually. Fascism is when the free liberal open society is challenged, so the Georgian Law forcing my NGOs to disclose their foreign funding is literally fascism. Fascism is when the government has any authority in the economy.

Can we just either filter or ban the term fascist?

>>2528427
>A purely bourgeois dictatorship as the "highest" stage of capitalism. A bit like what absolutism is to 'feudalism'.
Wrong. This implies that fascism actually unifies the bourgoeisie on any long-term basis. The bourgoeisie is not a unified class, they are in constant competition and can only unite under a fascist banner if they are compelled to. Otherwise they prefer their parliaments to argue with each other. Fascism obviously isn't the end stage of capitalism because the bourgoeisie stopped favoring fascism in most of the formerly fascist states.

Fascism is Capital's response to organized worker movements, yes. But there doesn't *need* to be an actual organized worker presence, Capital just needs to feel as if it exists and feel threatened by it even if it doesn't exist. Basically they see the cultural and ideological shift leftwards even though it is broadly liberal still and they are overreacting. So yes Trump and the modern MAGA movement is fascism in response to something that's not there but they feel is there, because the modern capitalist elite is not as competent or as aware as their predecessors were

>>2528448
true true

>>2528453
But it is there. Its not revolutionary, but it is present and cuts into their profit margins.

The defining characteristic of fascism is that it is a nationalist-populist movement which arises organically as a response to political failure of the existing regime. It's not some conspiracy started by the existing regime to protect itself, it's more like a symptom/side effect of the existing regime's destruction and the power vacuum it leaves behind. A nation falls into decline after a period of destructive war and/or economic collapse and the people become restless and dissatisfied with the existing regime and therefore become highly susceptible to indoctrination by some ambitious and charismatic leader who starts a nationalist-populist movement. That is fascism.

>>2528448
The video and the rest of the channel explain it in detail. It's dictatorship of finance capital through (financial) oligarchs. It requires a certain level of centralization/oligopoly/monopoly capitalism which does away with liberal democracy itself.
Japanese, Italian, German and Polish oligarchs actively funded and organized their respective fascist regimes.
>Fascism obviously isn't the end stage of capitalism because the bourgoeisie stopped favoring fascism in most of the formerly fascist states.
This ignores the part where, after WW2, the entire west consolidated into a single market. Doing away with the previous divisions between national capital among Western states (including "westernized" Japan and South Korea) in favor of a united front against the USSR/communism.
But now old divisions are rising again, including between both sides of the Atlantic. The final stage in the capitalist battle royale is the fascist dictatorship.
>>2528453
>Fascism is Capital's response to organized worker movements, yes. But there doesn't *need* to be an actual organized worker presence,
You don't. The channel explains it in more detail. Fascists kill communists, but so do liberals. The threat of communism is used to whip footsoldiers into a frenzy (be it brownshirts, Kempeitai, black shirts/squadrists, etc.), but it is not foundation of the Fascist dictatorship itself, which is structural.

>>2528485
You might as well call Mao and the Bolsheviks fascists too in that case. It doesn't explain how these "nationalist-populist" movements relate to capital and the bourgeoisie itself.

>>2528494
>You might as well call Mao and the Bolsheviks fascists too in that case

If the boot fits

>>2528489
in your opinion, does fascism or liberalism represent more of a danger to a vanguard state

The only difference between fascism and communism is that fascism is a partnership between the state and private power, whereas communism is a more like buyout or hostile takeover. But the end result is the same in either scenario - a handful of elite individuals own and control all of the wealth and means of production and the workers get nothing.

File: 1760982133928.jpg (106.41 KB, 1920x1080, fred.jpg)

>>2528511
Both will kill you for organizing eventually, but the threshold is much lower for a fascist (full on bourgeois) dictatorship.
>>2528525
Read a book please.

>>2528535
You have contributed nothing to the discussion.

>>2528540

It's not enough to just read the books, you have to actually think about them too.

>>2528535
see >>2528262
If fascism only exists to squash the left, why did Germany and Imperial Japan not revert to liberal democracy after getting rid of socialist trade unions, communists and socialist parties? Why did the bourgeois dictatorship in Japan consolidate in absence of a militant socialist mass movement threatening capital?
Besides Trump already designated anti-fascists as domestic terrorists lol.

>>2528544
That poster has failed at least one of those.

China and trans people that use linux

>>2528614
Japan had liberal democracy during the Taisho era

File: 1760993032506.jpg (78.8 KB, 673x436, wir 1.jpg)

What difference does it make whether the state overpowers and absorbs the private sector (communism) or the state mutually merges with the private sector (fascism)? The state will inevitably abandon their communist/fascist principles and adopt the exact same destructive and unsustainable business model of the private sector it replaced, investing all surplus capital into limitless expansion at the expense of social equality and long-term stability and transferring all the wealth away from the workers to the unaccountable ruling class. This is why every major industrial superpower, regardless of their officially-stated national ideology, shows the same rising trend towards higher wealth inequality, because that is the nature of power - power feeds and sustains itself, people in power will always leverage their power to attain more power, and power is not a means; it is an end.

>"Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." - George Orwell

>>2528741
In none of the countries on the graph state absorbed the private sector though.

>>2528748

Russia and China did, what do you think the Communist revolution was?

>>2528749
The graph starts in 1980, and if you want to pick this angle it clearly shows relinquishing state control of economy leads to growth of inequality.

>>2528741
>the state overpowers and absorbs the private sector (communism)
I'm tired of retards

>>2528758
>it clearly shows relinquishing state control of economy leads to growth of inequality.

Then why is Europe's line flatter than China? If it was just a matter of state control, then surely China, being the most state-controlled economy, should have less wealth inequality than liberal free market capitalist Europe.

Obviously it's not a matter of whether the state or private monopolies control the means of production - what matters is the actual workers themselves, the people, whether *they* control the means of production. Europe has maintained a more stable level of wealth equality than the other countries thanks to bottom-up collective efforts such as labor parties, labor unions, and more free democratic governments that are less restrictive of free speech and assembly and allow public participation in the political arena to some degree, giving workers some degree of leverage against both the state and private power. The countries with the highest inequality are the ones where workers have the least control over the means of production, whether the state or the monopoly is the instrument of the Empire is irrelevant.

>>2528802

To put it more bluntly - power is never given, only taken. If the people want power they must take it themselves, not expect someone else to take it and give it back to them because that will never ever happen in a million years.

>>2528311
Defense program of capitalism when the system keeps crumbling and workers need an enemy that isn't their bourgeoise leaders

>>2528802
You yourself mentioned labour parties and democratic governments though. Those exercise power through state. rt

File: 1760997118445.png (188.54 KB, 959x1147, 1760997107680.png)

>>2528741
That Post Soviet curve is so depressing

>>2528311
Anything I don't like

>>2528377
>Well sure, there was fear of Bolshevism, but there were other things going on too. I think fascists were afraid of a lot of things. They were also afraid of liberalism. They viewed it as weak and decadent.

Yknow there was an old Radio War Nerd episode I remember listening to. They were talking about Ukraine and specifically the dichotomy between the liberal Ukrainian politicians/oligarchs and the Nationalists. Something they mentioned is that now, at least, it seems like the nationalists may be the more “cautious” figures in Ukrainian politics, while the liberals have no problems sociopathically sending thousands of people to die in doomed counteroffensives as long as it maintains western support. Like the nationalists are genuinely concerned they’ll run out of people.

And I think this might help illuminate the true mindset of fascism more than just trying to come up with a list of traits—or maybe “fascist anti-liberalism”. I think that the psychology of it can be defined contra liberalism.

So liberalism, in its purest form, doesn’t truly care for the distinction of “nations”. All those Ukrainians that die in meaningless counteroffensives? They’re nothing more than a row on a spreadsheet containing a tabulation of all their assets and debts. A “Ukrainian” is just whoever has a Ukrainian passport, whoever can be taxed by the Ukrainian state, whoever has assets beneath the umbrella of the Ukrainian bourgeoisie. Meanwhile to the nationalists: it’s their countrymen.

How do you solve the emptying out of the Ukrainian populace? Just import more. Theres always some poor bastard out there you can start taxing. Of course to someone with deep national feeling, a nationalist, this seems insane. It’d be like learning your family just got brutally murdered then having the detective on the case say: “well looks like you should get a new wife.”

Fascism can be seen as perhaps an irrationalist revolt against liberalism. Perhaps not even socialism in particular, its enmity towards socialism perhaps spring boarding off its hatred of liberalism, and in many ways socialism evolved out of those liberal ideals. The socialist similarly says these “irrational” elements that the nationalist is deeply committed to are just that, irrational. The Saint that dies on the cross and fixes his gaze towards the heavens is just staring at the sky. Your language is just a function of communication and can simply be exchanged for any other; who cares if you’re told you’ll speak Russian or Spanish or Esperanto from now on, words are just dead. They’re static. Whether you say “hello” or “hola” is meaningless. Those religious festivals? Eh, just replace them with secular ones if they’re so important to you.

Hence Fascists seek some “third way” or whatever, it’s why they sometimes think they’re “neither right nor left”, because the way they see shit it’s the same thing. The capitalists and the socialists are both indifferent to their language dying out or some other country waltzing in and conquering theirs, as long as economic processes remain unaffected.

All this semantics about "fascism" or "capitalism" or "western liberalism" etc. everyone is really talking about the same thing, they just can't agree on what to call it. This malevolent oppressive force that has plagued human civilization throughout all of history that we perpetually do battle with and it constantly takes different forms and rebrands itself as different ideologies but its central motives remain the same - to conquer and rule the world, to be a force of total control and domination, to be a machine that grinds up the entire human species into a fine homogenous paste. I think it's good to have a more general and timeless word for it than "capitalism" or "industrial society" or "the West", something that describes exactly what we are all talking about that people of any political persuasion can immediately understand. The Empire is what I've settled on calling it. Babylon is what Rastas call it which is also a good word.

>>2528838
I broadly agree, but object to implication that nationalists have affection for their nation in itself. It is merely an expression of their ingroup-outgroup outlook, and generally have very little concern for their fellow citizens outside of conflict with other nations. The best example of that is standard right wing talking point about how government should not waste money on immigrants or foreign aid and instead take care of its own people, while taking "fuck you, got mine" attitude when it comes to actually helping locals.

>>2528824

The state does not provide those things to people, the people form labor unions on their own with certainly no help or encouragement from the state or anyone else. The workers organize and start strikes and protests and riots and they fight in the streets with strikebreakers and the police and they get sprayed with tear gas and busted in the head with clubs and thrown in jail and after years and years of this, if the workers can hold out and endure the beatings and the starvation long enough, the state will be forced to back down and cave to their demands. People tend to forget that all of the progress that has ever been made in the labor movement, and all social progress really, is extremely hard-fought and easily-eroded in the absence of constant vigilance. The workers who participated in these legendary strikes and riots in early 20th century were not students of Marx or academics or intellectuals of any kind, most of them were probably not even literate, they were just workers who seized the means of production through direct action and they figured it out for themselves, they didn't need any leader or book or ideology to guide them.

>>2528929
I am just kind of confused because you seem to treat "state" as a separate thing from "government".

>>2528259
First of all Trump is not a fascist but 100% liberal. Current class struggle in america goes on the lines of having living wages, basic healthcare, etc.

The American labour movement is awful, but capitalism is still suffering its worst moment in modern history, and fascism is still necessary to maintain some form of the status quo.

>>2570014
Denying the elephant in the room at this point is just not helpful.
Americans are being stripped of every civil liberty and extreme repression is becoming more and more normalized. The road to techno feudalism is being paved.

>>2528347
>then a lot of modern states are fascist

True: https://libcom.org/article/historical-cycle-political-rule-bourgeoisie-amadeo-bordiga


<Lenin made it clear that anyone who, in their economic analysis, nourishes the illusion that monopoly and statist capitalism can return to the liberal capitalism of the first classical form, is a reactionary. Similarly, we may now clearly say the same thing about anyone who pursues the miracle of a reaffirmation of the democratic liberal political method as opposed to that of the fascist dictatorship, with which, at a certain point of capitalism’s development, the bourgeois forces crush, with a tactic of open, frontal assault, the autonomous organizations of the proletarian class.


.

<Just as the Legitimist victors over Napoleon had to inherit the social and juridical framework of the new French regime, the victors over the fascists and the Nazis, in a process of greater or lesser duration, and of greater or lesser clarity, will confirm by virtue of their actions, although they will deny this with hollow ideological proclamations, the need to administer the world, which has been so tremendously altered by the second imperialist war, with the authoritarian and totalitarian methods that were first tested in the defeated countries.


.

>Fascism can be defined from the economic point of view as an attempt on the part of capitalism to control and limit its own development, an attempt whose purpose is to curtail, with centralized discipline, the growth of the most alarming aspects of economic phenomena that threaten to render the system’s contradictions irremediable.

>>2528259
Fascism is a bosses' offensive. It happens because capitalism is in crisis and requires some things:
1. war
2. further exploitation of the working class
3. restructuring to further the first two goals, as well as for its own sake in order to sanction superprofits for certain capitalists

The needs and outcomes of these three things cause what we see as fascism to emerge in the political (bourgeois state) sphere. On the other hand, there's the way crisis affects the working class. We have two choices:
a) plunder the wealthy by uniting as a class
b) plunder our own class by uniting with the wealthy

Fascism as we see it among the workers is when they choose (b). The class is already divided along many lines, and so those with the highest positions of privilege granted by the bourgeoisie already know they can betray their fellow members of their class in order to, at the very least, be the last ones enslaved, or have their quality of life deteriorate slower than it otherwise would if they were the group to be violently oppressed (while they're sold a dream of being enriched and uplifted by oppressing the oppression they bring to their own class).

This accounts for fascism's manifestation in both classes, and the relationships between the classes in fascist movements, and why fascism is always opposed to communism (which is because they are two alternatives posed by the crisis they simultaneously arise from). The weakening of the socialist movement among the masses does mean the growth of fascism, and that's what we saw in Italy in the early 20s. But it doesn't need to happen that fascism is a reaction to communism. In the present day the state is always poised to suppress communism and doesn't need to mutate any new movement for this purpose.

>>2528311
A sclerotic, ad-hoc, and unstable response to imperialist decay that historically appeared during the advanced interwar crisis of several imperialist nations, three of which were technical victors of the Great War. The program of the fascists was one of “national rejuvenation” as a means of saving their imperialist national capitals; the program pursued consisted of agrarian and industrial cartelization, the terroristic attack upon all workers organizations, the smashing of all German unions, the formal and de facto end of bourgeois democracy (democracy for the bourgeoisie) to produce a unitary party overcoming the fractious nature of an internally competitive class to allow for an aggressive reorientation towards both the proletarian enemy at home and the imperialist rivals abroad, a program of economic rationalization led by the state, that is, mass mechanization, the consolidation of economic functions into the state, not, say, by nationalization as would happen under “socialism” (Stalinism or social democracy) but by turning the Nazi Party itself into constant regulating pinkertons with seats on the corporate boards and usually ensuring owners and executive officers were loyal party comrades, so that is, a symbol wherein the bourgeoisie are told what to produce and when yet profits accumulate to that class as it was before and their hierarchical position within production is maintained, in the Nazi example the failures of these policies (they failed for all three) were most evident, so additional measures to end the economic crisis were initiated, including mass prison labor, compulsory labor for the unemployed, mass arrests (all amounting to state directed slavery) and eventually international conquest as an endless funnel for investment, means for acquiring plunder, and means for the acquisition of additional labor-power to exploit; in terms of state backed slavery, as stated, the economic crisis never abated, not even through the war, a slave functions as fixed capital within this system, as such it comes with costs, namely the costs of maintaining a slave as a living human capable of labour. The Nazi solution to this was annihilation through work and the outright murder of those who could not be worked to death in such a fashion, such as the pregnant, very young children, and the elderly; luckily for the Nazis this could be justified as part of their racial cleansing campaign.

>>2528614
It’s always funny as fucking shit to me that tankoids unironically think the reason Britain and France didn’t immediately go to war with Germany was *specifically* so it could destroy all of Europe and then the Soviet Union and not, like, the massive fucking war that was still alive in recent memory, killed millions of their people, destroyed their economies, and nearly collapses their governments. Like, when France actually did fight Germany in WWII they fuckin lost, and Britain nearly did too. That’s why they went with appeasement for a very long time. Not to mention WWII was a good outcome for capitalism so idky tankoids worship it so much, it literally revitalized the system. Like not saying either government was benevolent but “Ackshually they were HOPING Europe would be destroyed because they hated that random shithole that also wasn’t going to invade any other country THAT MUCH” is such a nonsensical and arguably idealist as fuck take

File: 1763894720110.jpg (159.14 KB, 606x757, behemoth.jpg)

Fascism (Italian fascismo, from fascio — bundle, union, association) is a political movement that arose in capitalist countries during the period of the general crisis of capitalism and expresses the interests of the most reactionary and aggressive forces of the imperialist bourgeoisie. Fascism in power is the terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary forces of monopolistic capital, carried out with the goal of preserving the capitalist system. The most important distinguishing features of fascism are the use of extreme forms of violence to suppress the working class and all working people, militant anti-communism, chauvinism, racism, extensive use of state-monopolistic methods of regulating the economy, maximal control over all aspects of social and personal life, broad connections with a significant portion of the population not belonging to the ruling classes, and the ability—through nationalist and social demagogy—to mobilize and politically activate this population in the interests of the exploitative system (the mass base of fascism consists mainly of the middle strata of capitalist society). Fascist foreign policy is a policy of imperialist conquest.

The common features inherent in fascism as a political movement do not exclude the existence of various forms determined by the degree of predominance of political or militarist forces. The predominance of militarist forces is characteristic of military-fascist regimes.

>>2570929
In the struggle to create a mass social base, fascism put forward a system of views (the so-called fascist ideology), which made extensive use of reactionary doctrines and theories that had developed before its appearance (the racist ideas of J. A. de Gobineau, J. V. de Lapouge, H. Chamberlain, etc.; the anti-democratic concepts of F. Nietzsche and O. Spengler; antisemitism; geopolitics, pan-Germanism, etc.).

At the center of fascist ideology are the ideas of military expansion, racial inequality, “class harmony” (the doctrine of the “people’s community” and “corporatism”), leadership cult (“the Führer principle”), and the all-powerfulness of the state apparatus (the theory of the “total state”). These ideas found their most concentrated expression in Adolf Hitler’s book Mein Kampf (1925). A very significant characteristic of fascist ideology is loud demagogy aimed at masking its true content. Serving this goal, in particular, was the speculative use by fascists of the popularity of socialist ideas among the masses.

Emerging as a reaction to the revolutionary upsurge heralded by the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia, fascism became a fierce and dangerous enemy of all progressive humanity and above all of the international revolutionary workers’ movement. The first fascist organizations appeared in spring 1919 in Italy in the form of paramilitary squads composed of nationalistically minded former frontline soldiers. In October 1922, the fascists—who had become a major political force—staged an armed “March on Rome,” which provided the ruling circles of Italy with a pretext for appointing the leader of the Italian fascists (“Duce”), Benito ᴉuᴉlossnW, as prime minister on 31 October 1922. Over the next four years, the fascist leadership gradually eliminated bourgeois-democratic freedoms and established the absolute power of the fascist oligarchy. In the 1930s Italy completed the creation of a corporate state, which contributed to the militarization of the Italian economy. The democratic trade-union movement and the economic and political gains of the working class were abolished. ᴉuᴉlossnW’s government pursued an increasingly active policy of imperialist expansion. In 1935 fascist Italy launched a war against Ethiopia, and after conquering it (1936) took part in the intervention against Republican Spain (1936–1939); in 1939 it seized Albania; in October 1940 it attacked Greece; and earlier, in June of the same year, declared war on France, thus entering World War II (1939–45). During this war, the fascist regime in Italy collapsed (1943).

not a flood lol

>>2570930
The German fascist National Socialist Party arose in 1919 (the official name — National Socialist German Workers’ Party — reflected the desire of its organizers to exploit the influence of socialist ideas among German workers in the interests of extreme reaction). Amid a deepening political crisis, relying on support from major monopolies and forming an alliance with influential circles in the Reichswehr leadership, the leader (“Führer”) of German fascists, Adolf Hitler, received a mandate to form a government in late January 1933. By staging the Reichstag fire and blaming the communists (see Leipzig Trial, 1933), the German fascists within a few months completely “synchronized” the country, unleashing bloody terror on all democratic and liberal currents, imprisoning and physically eliminating all real and potential opponents of the Nazi regime. After the Communist Party, the Social Democratic Party and all traditional bourgeois parties were banned. All public organizations—especially trade unions—were dissolved; parliament was stripped of its prerogatives; all forms of public oversight over the state administration were abolished. The dictatorship mechanism created by National Socialism included a terror apparatus marked by extreme brutality (SA, SS, the Gestapo, the “People’s Court,” and other organs of fascist justice), an apparatus for organizing influence on the population (the National Socialist Party, the National Socialist Women’s League, the Hitler Youth, the German Labor Front, the “Strength Through Joy” organization, etc.), which controlled all forms of public activity, as well as an apparatus for propaganda control of the masses (headed by the Ministry of Propaganda). In close alliance with the military leadership, Hitler's government carried out a rapid militarization of Germany. A course was immediately taken toward militarizing the economy, accompanied by the implementation of various forms of state-monopolistic regulation (state investments, primarily for military purposes; tax policy; credit policy and planned inflation; administrative control over economic development; forced syndicalization or cartelization of industry; creation of new associations of monopolists, etc.). International agreements limiting Germany’s armaments were broken, and a series of aggressive acts were carried out to strengthen the military-strategic positions of German imperialism in its struggle for world domination. In 1936–39 Germany, together with Italy, participated in the intervention against Republican Spain. In 1938 it carried out the forced annexation (Anschluss) of Austria; in 1938–39 it seized and partitioned Czechoslovakia. By attacking Poland in September 1939, fascist Germany unleashed World War II.

Having come to power in Italy and Germany, the fascists placed numerous foreign fascist and pro-fascist organizations under their influence. In some countries these organizations became a serious danger to bourgeois-democratic regimes. Between the two world wars, fascist-type regimes were established in several East and Central European states: Hungary (Horthy regime), Austria, Poland (“sanation regime”), Romania, the Baltic states, etc. Under the influence of Italy and Germany, the fascist movement developed in Spain, where after a bloody civil war (1936–39; see Spanish Revolution 1931–39) a fascist dictatorship under Franco was established in March 1939 with military and political support from Italian and German interventionists. Even earlier, a fascist dictatorship under Salazar had been established in Portugal.

By the mid-1930s fascism had become a mortal threat not only to the workers’ and democratic movements of individual countries but also to all humanity, calling into question the existence of many nations. Awareness of this threat led to the rise of a broad anti-fascist movement based on the unity of all political forces ready to resist fascism. The leading role in organizing this resistance was played by communist parties following the decisions of the 7th Congress of the Comintern on a united workers’ and popular front (1935; see Communist International), taking into account the specific circumstances of each country. In countries where fascism was in power, communists led the underground anti-fascist movement (see Anti-fascist movement). During World War II the fascist occupiers implemented a carefully developed system of mass extermination of people in occupied territories. According to some estimates, approximately 18 million people of all European nationalities passed through the concentration camps and death camps organized by the National Socialists (see German fascist concentration camps). Of these, 11 million people were brutally murdered. Fascist terror in the occupied territories, genocide, and the deliberate destruction of millions fully revealed the inhuman essence of fascism, which earned the hatred of the peoples of the world. In the fascist rear, in the occupied territories, and in the fascist countries themselves, a Resistance Movement arose, undermining the military strength of the fascist army and the stability of fascist regimes.

The defeat in 1945 of Germany and its allies by the forces of the anti-Hitler coalition, with the decisive participation of the USSR, dealt a heavy blow to fascism. However, in some capitalist countries (Spain, Portugal) the ruling classes managed to prolong the existence of fascist-type dictatorial regimes in the postwar years. In the countries that led the fascist bloc, the roots of fascism were not completely eliminated. The onset of the Cold War after World War II led to a revival of the most reactionary, including fascist, elements even in those capitalist states that had been part of the anti-Hitler coalition. Equally important is the fact that the social and political processes that gave rise to fascism and at a certain historical stage turned it into a powerful force (the development of state-monopoly capitalism and the deepening of the general crisis of capitalism, economic and political upheavals in capitalist countries) continue in contemporary capitalist society. In capitalist states whose ruling circles adhere to traditional methods of governance, a more or less influential far-right opposition has formed, in many cases openly fascist or semi-fascist in character. The strength and influence of this opposition fluctuate depending on economic conditions and the international situation, often increasing with the intensification of crises domestically and internationally, and weakening when tensions subside.

In some cases fascist and semi-fascist elements, allied with militarist forces, attempt to seize power through military coups. In April 1967 a coup occurred in Greece, and in September 1973 in Chile. In these countries a terrorist military-fascist dictatorship was established. Earlier (in 1954) a terrorist dictatorship had been established in Paraguay. Reactionary military forces also exercise significant influence on the domestic and foreign policies of several other Latin American countries.

Under new conditions fascist forces naturally take on new forms, often trying to distance themselves from the discredited fascist movements of the past. Therefore, when speaking of contemporary fascism, the term “neo-fascism” is most often used. Under conditions of intensifying general crisis of capitalism, neo-fascist forces widely employ the so-called strategy of tension, organizing terrorist and other subversive actions. The main goal of this strategy is to create among politically unstable segments of the public the impression that parliamentary governments are completely incapable of ensuring public order, thus pushing moderately conservative voters into the arms of “legal” neo-fascists. Overall, however, the position of fascism after World War II is much weaker than before it. The overthrow of fascism in Portugal (April 1974) and Greece (July 1974), as well as the collapse of Francoism in Spain, convincingly demonstrates the weakness of fascist regimes under modern conditions. The balance of class forces in industrially developed capitalist countries in many cases limits the arbitrariness of monopolistic bourgeoisie. The rightward shift promoted by those in power is countered by a shift to the left — the expansion of democracy, which is the result of the persistent struggle of the masses and above all of the working class. Under growing anti-fascist sentiment and the increasing attractiveness of socialism, the ruling classes of capitalist countries often consider a transition from bourgeois-democratic forms of rule to openly fascist methods dangerous.

The most important barrier to fascism is the creation of a united front of democratic forces.

not a flood!

>>2528259
Trump isn't fascist. He is a liberal. ACP is fascist, and will become popular when the communist movement starts to grow.

>>2571043
Haz is the American ᴉuᴉlossnW.
Screencap this

>>2528259
The capitalists dispense with liberal democracy when they can no longer agree on matters between themselves. This usually happens during a crisis of capitalism which tends to be associated with communist resistance. Economically, fascism mostly boils down to measures reducing overheads of commercial profit.

>>2577948
I guess I'd basically describe fascism as a civil war between the capitalists within a state. It's not really different than an inter-imperialist war but within a state rather than between states.


Unique IPs: 28

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]