/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>one shared destiny for everyone
Yes, and?

>>2532641
I don't know whether your gripe is true or not, but one look at /board/ meetup pics is usually enough to cure me of any tendency to take /board/s too seriously. Invariably it's a bunch of uggos, chunguses, and spergy-looking misfits, even on boards like 4chud /fa/.

Communism is about upending currently existing society, not smoking weed and coming to different weed philosophies than your bro.

>>2532647

If I came here from Reddit, that's on you for creating a community that is too much like Reddit.

>>2532641
There are so few of us on imageboards that we cant be that picky.

>>2532641
What if at least 60% of my country's population from the bottom up supports communism, 70% supports Stalin and 90% supports killing liberals? Have you thought about that, angloid cretin?

>>2532641
Say what ever you want about authoritarianism but it was only tankie experiments that had a success while the lib ones failed.

We have implode the current social structure to their exhaustion so that we can construct a new socialist society, that requires some degree of authoritarianism otherwise people will put up utopian policies or retreat back into capitalism which we can’t allow.

Overall we need both material and psychological emancipation and we will get that by tackling the contradictions and synthesis of each phenomenon and how we should react to it soo that we don’t end up in dogmatism.

All of that requires a vanguard state, sorry not sorry

>>2532656
More over is about using contradiction of each action and to elevate both the initial idea and it’s reaction by the use of Aufheben.

China manages this through socialism with Chinese characteristics, op is a liberal stuck in capitalist ways of thinking

>you all have authoritarian thinking
we do have authoritarian thinking,

we should all be in charge
in charge of the means of production and should be a dictatorship of the proletariat

>>2532641
What's the point of getting involved in politics if you're not authoritarian?

>>2532747
Because muh don’t tread on me man, we have too be democratic and le free

>>2532747
LARP, moralizing, virtue signalling, a lot of reasons. But in the end, the toppling of a current order is merely a vacuum that will be filled by a new order, and to be a libcuck is to cede what that new order should be.

>>2532641
>It's always universal top-down solutions, it's always all-or-nothing, you're either with us or against us, there can only be one way to live, one universal dogma, one kind of society, one shared destiny for everyone, lead follow or get out of the way.
Yes.