It turns out that Norway's SWF almost has more money per capita than Norwegian private wealth, that is to say, its material base is such that it can realize PDD, with 2 trillion in the SWF vs about 500 billion GDP.
Roedt seems to be doing adequately, but how good are the revolutionary conditions there? I normally wouldn't advocate first world revolution, whether by the bullet or the ballot, but that 2 trillion is tempting as all hell.
Norwegian are Strasserites par excellence.
Vikings then, vikings now, all their civilization is based in plunder, empty the country
Oil exporter.
Progress, their populist fascist party, ate the conservatives, but Roedt seems to have come out of nowhere with about 5% representation. I'm assuming private wealth inequality is high, as with the rest of the Scandinavian model, but income inequality is acceptable and the place is just a decaying Scandinavian social democracy.
The weirdness essentially comes out to the giant SWF. Good for Fascists, good for Communists too. It's a fight over the 2 trillion once their liberal center collapses.
Statistics show that 53% of private wealth is held by the top 10%, rising to 71% when you add the next decile.
Bottom 50% of the population averages 2% of total wealth. Gini 28, though.