What do you bros think of this chart? Good or bad? I discovered it while browsing the internet on acid. I actually took it serious over the last year because I'm insane. Was I an idiot?
>>2553511>Was I an idiot?yes, this is reactionary idpol slop
>>2553516Pic made me horny
/pol/transhumanist insanity, absolutely meaningless and also gay.
>>2553511It's insanely retarded, but I'm also disappointed in myself for knowing almost everything this image references
>>2555230If you don't know the way your enemy thinks, how can you defeat them?
>>2555230>>2555234What's to be disappointed about/how was this created by "an enemy"? I don't think any Nazi's would have read Spinoza… lol. And acknowledgement of the spectacle is a pretty leftist concept, I don't see republicans talking about Debord
Vulgar right-wing slop. Insight into the madness of their minds if nothing else.
>>2555271People on 4chan called it leftist slop that's why I posted it here lol
>>2555273I don't want to live in this world.
Some things in there are a bit leftcoded or whatever fucking shit people say these days, I have to say after looking at it closer. Whoever made this picture should kill themselves, and me for looking at it.
>>2555278Deleuze, Spinoza, the spectacle, and shitting on protestants is like typical lefty stuff. Also it lists neo-nazis as among the "bugmen"
>>2555280Yes, also
"Nazbol Gang", an OG /leftypol/ meme
"22nd Century Posadists"
"Spectacle Sorcerers"
The stuff about Process Druids which I can only assume has to do with the Process Church and it's druidic rituals sounds like something cooked up by a leftist with an interest in parapolitics.
>>2555288See now THIS is why I made this thread, great response. I didn't even know what the process druids were
>>2555288>evola bullshit, reactoids and orthodox christianity in "enlightened"/"goytoys">distinguishing between anally probed and not anally probed alien abductees>unironic neo-nazis and reactionaries being somehow "better" than nihilists and feminists<no mahayana buddhism despite other vehicles mentionednot leftist at all. closer to dugin which is often mistaken for a leftist or a based anti-imperialist by "patsoc" westoids that have no idea what they're talking about
>>2555280dugin claims to be influenced by schizoanalysis and debord, too
>>2555602Either way it's slop garbage either by schizophrenics or ironypoisoned retards
>>2555611>ironypoisoned retardsmostly this. memed themselves into becoming a run off the mill reactionary
>>2555614Many such cases.
This chart reminds me of bizarre nonsensical charts that AI chatbots tend to create. Maybe it was AI generated, but maybe it doesn't even matter - maybe there's no meaningful difference between the output of a broken LLM and the output of a broken human brain that has been poisoned by social media; they're both just random noise generators now.
Unique IPs: 11