Why oppose the eugenics? Democratize the superior genes. Distribute them. Seize the means of superior reproduction.
And no I’m not talking about making everyone blonde and blue eyed. I’m talking about making everyone smart, less greedy, more social, less criminally inclined, less prone to psychopathy and schizophrenia and more disease resistant in general.
China does eugenics and so should you.
eugenics got a bad wrap in the west cause you know, hitler
>>2560318but what about doing the opposite and making the most monstrous looking person possible to suffer the worse life ever with a shitload of weird diseases, that would be fun too
>>2560402But give them a huge dick
I am not against eugenics but I they will be made soon obsolete by genetic engineering and medicine
It is not the 19th century anymore
>>2560402>>2560404Give them ten billion dollars and severe brain damage
Watch them continue to accrue money
>>2560318>Democratize the superior genesHow do you define "superior"?
How would you do this exactly? Hotwife breeding?
>>2560454<vitro fertilization (IVF)Fuck off perv.
communism is alredy eugenic.
true eugenics will happen when humanity achieves real stability, equality and therefore health.
there is nothing more eugenic than a world population free of toil, with medical science advanced, less work hours so more time to exercise, people will still eat shit food for pleasure but not as much if their life is less stressful.
>>2560477I think hot wife breeding sounds better though
>>2560485it's weird to pose lysenko against mendel when mendel wasn't proposing "genes" but just noticing patterns in pea plants and documenting them using punnet squares.
>>2560402Albanians already exist
>>2560318Well one argument against eugenics is it's impossible to know the future and what genes will be best in the ever changing environment, but socialists are all about planning so oh well. I guess there could be concerns about genetic stagnation if everyone chases the same ideals and then some random disease wipes us out like a monocrop.
"superior genes" aren't a thing
A healthy gene pool is a diverse gene pool. If you are culling "bad" genes you are running the risk of depleting reproductive viability.
>>2560318The way I see it, it's putting the cart before the horse.
As much as I am a layman, I will not budge that the problems of capitalism can not be fixed with superior genes. For the same reasons I don't think that GMOs or "superfoods" are the key to ending hunger. And I don't think it reasonable to wait for the human species to transcend the need of nutrition through some world wide transhumanist project for the problem to be solved.
Another retard with inferior genes that doesn't understand how genes work
Epigenetics retard
Unique IPs: 19