Five Eyes, honestly, shouldn't be using that much AI because AI based opinion control tends to breed reactance and ressentiment.
My previous position was pure Third Worldist, i.e, that Marxism is hopeless in the developed West, that for Marxists in the first world, you have three options: rear guard battle in the core, revolution in the periphery and semi periphery where Marxism and more specifically Marxist-Leninism actually have a chance, and emigration to an actual ML state (North Korea, China, Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, C) or ML controlled territory (Kerala in India).
Looking at the "what is Communism" thread, it seems that it might be worthwhile to actually establish a Trotskyite/Demsoc territory or country within the imperial core, simply for the propaganda value and to influence opinion in the developed West.
That means:
-Developed country / Imperial Core status
-Victory through elections, however much disinformation is used to win the first few.
-Subsidies from BRICS to provide high HDI and standard of living to survive the inevitable Western sanctions.
-Potential military protection from Russia or China, to prevent coup attempts or hard attacks.
-A BJP / LDP-style political structure, wherein the vanguard party effectively controls the mainstream and the elections, but allows the existence of rump opposition parties or loss of local control over regions.
I think the point is concentration, i.e, looking for a country where a Trotskyite revolution CAN succeed, and dedicating efforts to decisively win elections there.
But personally, in the developed core, the revolutionary potential is garbage.
The closest country I can think of is actually Singapore, given PAP decline, but Beijing is unlikely to support unrest in its new Hong Kong surrogate.
Any suggestions for revolutionary candidates? Remember, the point is, comrades from both the West and the South focus on taking this specific country. The sustainability will be based off a combination of BRICS subsidies and Sino-Russian military protection. The difference between this and traditional Third Worldist revolutionary attempts in the core is that we are actually trying to succeed, whereas the traditional Third Worldist position is to simply see revolution in the core as attempts at disruption and sabotage.
>Looking at the "what is Communism" thread
Shit thread, clearly anticommunist bait
>looking for a country where a Trotskyite revolution CAN succeed, and dedicating efforts to decisively win elections there.
wtf
Are you retarded and/or glowing
basically, all you want is LARP socialism / Marxism. Marxism demands praxis, not being bitches of social Dems and fascists.
You have three choices: rear-guardism in the core, or being social Democrat whores. Revolutionary death in some insurgency somewhere, I think only the Naxalites are still active and prominent. Or, moving to an ML country and conducting normal praxis there, by paying your taxes and accelerating socialist development.
I'm suggesting a fourth: find a core country vulnerable enough to the periphery and semi-periphery that has the conditions necessary for electoral victory, and then do it. Then build up counter hegemony from state backing, while under effective semi-periphery protection and support.