Historically speaking how were judeochristian westoids so successful at divide and conquer to the point they managed to literally invent meme ethnicities to serve as compradors and fifth columnists in the places they wanted to colonize?
>"judeo-christian"
Pretty sure they were just Christian.
You said like only the west did that, islamoid retarded
>>2564882>Christianity comes from IslamYou do realize there are Christian communities in Iraq that pre-date the arrival of Islam by hundreds of years, right?
>>2564890Why are you jumping to the idea that I support Israel, stupid islmaoid, this imageboard really should ban all religions retarded that post here, this place is for a progressive userbase, not your pet place for keep posting about your stupid backwater religon, islamtarded.
>>2564892Zionist autism score post
>>2564889You are dumb, image says take either some arab from an heresy of Islam (such as Druze) or just convert him to Christianity and then pretend he's a phenishun ASSyrian or any other ancient meme ethnicity of your desire
>I'm a leftist like the rest of you and totally not a Zionist shill, fellow socialists
>>2564886Judaism and Christianity are the same thing
>>2564893Like I said that, this place should ban all religons retards, imbecile like that think only in black and white, "uhh if you don't support my reactionary backwater religon than you're a zion rat", both are shit, judaism is shit and your stupid reactionary islam is shit too, get the fuck out of here, islamic reactionary imbecile
>>2564895>criticize a reactionary religon is defeding zionismLow I.Q
>>2564897What if I'm a progressive Islamic imbecile?
>>2564900There's no "progressive islam" , all religions are reactionary by their own nature
>>2564901All resistance movements to imperialism are progressive by nature, even when they are religious.
>>2564903No, it's stupid, it's like the idea of supporting nazis because they fight british imperialism, it's stupid, the idea of supporting reactionary groups because they fight imperialism is self defeating and a betrayal of progressive ideas in the name of pragmist that in the long run only help reactionary group to be stronger
>>2564905My point is that religions are not inherently reactionary, and there can be various movements within a religion. Al Qaeda, ISIS and co are reactionary but you can't say that about the Iranian-supported axis of resistance which fights imperialism within their own countries.
>>2564909Unfortunately religions are reactionaries by their own nature, you can't be really a genuine pro socialism leftist and at the same time defend a religion, the idea of mixing socialism with religon will always let some reactionary ideas creep in inside socialism until they cement themselves and become norms in a society.
>>2564903Imperialism is progressive retard
>>2564912If they are fighting to liberate their country from foreign influence and intervention they are progressive. Period.
>>2564917Yes and no, you still can be critical of their ideas and ideology, to say a islamic group is progressive is quiet the stretch to make
>>2564896No one says that other a niche of pagan larpers
>>2564912>Unfortunately religions are reactionaries by their own natureThere's no such thing as an innate nature to things retard
>judeochristian
You're not subtle. Back to your containment site /pol/faggot.
>>2564953>Muh essentialism is tru do cuz I said soActual retard lmao
>>2564943>>2564961>things don't have essence, bro, all is flux according to my necessary understating of the worldOk, idiot
>>2564882I was under the impression that Mohammed had special priviliges for Jews written in Quran?
>>2564969>Restating the same thing as if that will make you less retardedPoor pea brained idealist
>>2564896Judaism and Islam have more in common than either does with Christianity tbqh.
>>2564971It just says that other "People of the Book" (i.e. monotheistic/Abrahamic faiths) should be allowed to practice their religion as long as they follow certain rules.
>>2564988Qur’an 2:47
> “O Children of Israel, remember My favor which I have bestowed upon you and that I preferred you over the worlds.” >>2564882Arabs arrived to the Levant in the Middle Ages during the era of the Islamic Conquest, before that the region was populated by Syriac Christians
>>2565011Locals just switched languages to upper class who spoke arabic. It wasnt a mass migration event.
OP you're literally a Persian-Turkish-Arab rape baby mutt identifying with the British made identity of Arabism, calm down لا انيج امك على صدرك
>>2565011>Arabs arrived to the LevantSince prerecorded history
>>2565040>British made identity>>2565040>British made identityBut enough about mandaeans, ASSyrians, Phenishuns, Copts and other meme larpers of the region
>>2565022Honestly what the arabs did with their conquest is a classic case of military and cultural imperialism.
>>2565055You fucking zionist cockroach, Arabs have been autochtonous to the Mashriq since prerecorded history as seen time and time again by the several kingdoms and states such as Palmyra, Emessa, Edessa, Bostra and even an Arabistan in north Iraq in Greco-Roman periods, even in the roman empire there were Arab emperor and empresses like Julia Domna and Philip the Arab
What a pathetic lie and insult to history this zionist invention that Arabs only existed in the mashriq after islam is
>>2565055Yes it was regime change to expand the tax base, not settler colonialism.
>>2565056Calm down, Abdullah, last time I read the islamic conquest were violent and kind of imperialist, it's history, stop denying it because make your people look bad, face reality and admit, peolpe do bad things, it's history, dumb dumb.
>>2564959How is that pol? Is correct and a term invented by christians and jews in the west to separate themselves and discriminate muslims, and I agree with them they're an anathema to all Arab and middle eastern peoples
>>2565057But they did make people convert to islam and adopt their cultural way of life.
Unique IPs: 18