>>2575998>anarchism isn't an active movementyet rojava, and Zapatista remain.
>>2617067So you know how Yugoslavia had worker self-management and managers were elected inside specfic industries? Or how in the early USSR local soviets held a lot of political power? Its like that but more democratic and they aren't appointed by the state, infact the state doesn't exist and instead its a series of soviets organizated amongst each other. Although it should be noted I probably need to read more from Pannekoek and im oversimplifing
>>2617107More like only 6 years of the USSR ever actually served the interests of the working class, again if it isn't obvious the Vanguard became the new ruling class.