[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1763804891874.png (43.59 KB, 861x383, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Hello Leftypol! I am currently writing an encyclopedia about the internet and yesterday i created a page about this very site. However, It is a sentence stub and i can not think of any information to add here. Can you guys help out? Thanks!

https://internetalexandria.skywiki.org/wiki/Leftypol
Here is the article if you want to help out yourself.

>pol splinter
newfriend coal

>>2569903
How was i supposed to know? Removing..

>>2569904
others can correct me if im wrong. but the original people started out in /lit/ where there were max sterner and zizek memes. leftypol was founded on 8chan as a splinter of /lit/. however over time we did get people coming over, and at one point half the people were converts from /pol/ around 2015-ish.


this thread slid a bit so im bumping it

Hey anon, welcome! Here's /leftypol/'s own page on our own Wiki site. https://leftypedia.miraheze.org/wiki//leftypol/
You'll probably need to sample instead of copy as this focuses on the history of the board itself, /leftypol/, rather than the current websites it resides on (leftypol.org and leftychan.net).

https://leftypedia.miraheze.org/wiki//leftypol/

>>2569945
thank you anon!

* oops, didn't realize I'd pasted the link twice

>>2569907
>half were polak converts
God damn, so half of leftypol uyghas were once seething about BBC and russian saboteurs on /pol/ ?!?!
Life is strange

Newgen coal, read encyclopedia dramatica and heyuri wiki

>>2569897
Make sure to write an article on 420chan, we're hanging on waiting for it to come back https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/627790.html

>>2612874
WHY CANT MODS JUST MAKE A /420/ BOARD HERE REEEEEEEE
THERE ARE SO MANG DEAD BOARDS HANGING ON THIS SITE, JUST GIVE MY WEED BROTHERS A SPACE FFS, MODS PLEEEAAAAAASE I BEG YOU, I WILL RESPECT ALL THE RULES FOREVER IF YOU DO THIS, IT CANT BE THAT HARD

>>2612874
You can use taimapedia's archive (420chan's own former wiki) for some reference if you'd like
https://web.archive.org/web/20160308120248/http://taimapedia.org/index.php?title=420chan

>>2612878
We asked for it like 50 times, they don't care, all the threads asking are still up in the meta, most of us are just on the refugees server working on a site revival called 42chan which will preserve the culture museum thread from siberia since they're not going to pin it and it will eventually sink to the bottom of the catalog >>2612874
its already been archived on archive.org and archive.today but those don't archive files, videos and the images only remain as thumbnail previews at low res.

>>2612886
It's fucked up that the mods are such snobs. They really act like they are a superior caste who are disgusted not only by 420refugees but also by users of this site in general.
It's not like this site gets too many users anyway, an injection of 420 users would be nice for the traffic. Specially since some 420users undoubtedly have some interests in politics, music etc and will post in these boards too.
Anyway….

>>2612894
Most of the /pol/ board on 420chan was leftypol users, you can go into the archive and see like all the old bookchin drawing memes for yourself. 420chan was by far the most "leftist" imageboard for a long time if we're just going by popular definition.

>>2612886
Is there a link for it anon? 42chan.org or .com don't seem to work

>>2612897
Then why are leftypol mods so cruel to you? Is there no solidarity?

>>2612908
Leftypol had different users over the years. Its mostly stalinists and maoist conservatives now.

>>2612901
42chan.net
Its only just a lander page for now. You can visit the server if you don't mind using fedcord T3ByaxUc

>>2612916
You guys should create a matrix instead

>>2612801
>God damn, so half of leftypol uyghas were once seething about BBC and russian saboteurs on /pol/ ?!?!
/pol/ was never exclusively nazis btw
A lot of the people who went from /pol/ -> /leftypol/ were people who wanted to discuss politics without being spammed with BBC porn

>>2612912
Hey dude im a stalinist and im defending your cause
I think its beyond ideology, the mods are just snobs now

>>2612930
>Hey dude im a stalinist and im defending your cause
You oppose the war on drugs, drug prohibition and stigmatization? I don't suspect you condemn all "AES" states for adopting this american policy exported throughout the UN or see the contradiction.

>>2612949
I oppose the WOD
I am for strict regulations on drugs. It depends on what drugs etc ofc. And yeah as a stalinist, heroine peddlers get executed within 3 minutes of trial.

>>2612949
>I oppose the WOD (drug prohibition)
>I want to prohibit "evil" drugs and execute producers
Nothing less expected from such a contradictory position

>>2612966
Producers lmao
Only weed must be allowed and that too, strictly regulated

>>2612966
>waaah dont touch my weed farmers waaaaah
Sorry but state will nationalize and control production

>>2612969
You're not against the WOD, you don't know anything about drugs, chemistry and botany.
>>2612974
Nobody is saying anything against planned economy, you're a prohibitionist.

>>2612977
Yeah becoming a heroine zombie is totally wholesome according to chemistry and botany you fucking moron

>>2612977
Yeah. I dont know anything. I am a brainwashed wodigger. I repent for my moral failing.

>>2612980
As if prohibition has ever prevented that from happening. How come there weren't any heroin zombies before prohibition?

Drugs arent as bad as video games and phones and gambling.

>>2612983
Distribution networks were primitive, ignorant Digger
How did it go in China? 25% of the male population were lazy heroine addicts slouching in opium dens

>>2612991
Yea too lazy to go die in a war, so Mao just decided to kill them himself.

>>2612991
>Distribution networks were primitive, ignorant Digger
Yet most people had access to opium, crazy we were just opium zombies for thousands of years before the great stalin mao and nixon told people that the drug literally turns them into ZOMBIEEESSSS and has no recreational or medical use at all :(((

>>2612991
"In Galenic practice the most useful medicine was a theriaca, or antidote, named Electuarium theriacale magnum, a compound composed of several ingredients, among them opium and wine.1"

In other words, for nearly 2,000 years, the Western world had made use of the poppy to relieve common ailments. Then along came sinophobic American politicians in the early 20th century, insisting that the drug would ensnare our dear white young people in the vice of "the Orient." Suddenly the world's universally recognized godsend medicine was illegal – and medical professionals were waiting in the wings to take advantage of that fact, to acclaim themselves the white knights who were henceforth going to cure all the illnesses that we laypeople used to cure at home with a little laudanum. And so they demonized this time-honored panacea as having no positive uses whatsoever. Can you believe it? They told us that the one recognized panacea in the world has no uses whatsoever! It still amazes me that no one on the Drug War bandwagon – which is to say all politicians – have ever had any scruples about the endless stakeholders who go without godsend medicines thanks to their mischaracterization of opium.

All of our problems with opioids and opiates could have been avoided had the busybody Chicken Littles in America left well enough alone and let folks continue to smoke regulated opium peaceably in their own homes. Instead, we denied them their godsend right to self-medication 2 and what was the result? Determined users are now using opiates 50 times the strength of smoked opium – opiates that are unregulated as to quantity and quality, with the result that we have daily deaths from unintentional overdoses.

This is how the Drug Warrior "solves" a problem, in the manner of the governess in Turn of the Screw by Henry James. In their attempts to protect white young people, they kill hundreds of thousands and turn cities into war zones and destroy the rule of law in Latin America, not to mention in the United States itself. Their Drug War has killed over a half a million since 1917 alone3. Someday, we need a reckoning that will hold these prohibitionists responsible for all these completely unnecessary deaths – deaths that could have been prevented by a sane drug policy involving drug regulation to allow for the safest possible use.

This anti-Chinese movement, by the way, was led by Samuel Gompers, president of the American Federation of Labor. Here is an extended quote from Szasz to illustrate the hateful bona fides of America's war on the panacea known as opium.

"Presaging by many decades the press-agentry of totalitarian propagandists, Gompers creates, out of his hate-filled fantasies, the image of the Chinese opium fiend— an image whose impact has possibly been even greater than the impact of the famous Nazi mendacities. According to Hill [labor activist Herbert Hill], 'Gompers conjures up a terrible picture of how the Chinese entice little white boys and girls into becoming ‘opium fiends.’ Condemned to spend their days in the back of laundry rooms, these tiny lost souls would yield up their virgin bodies to their maniacal yellow captors. ‘What other crimes were committed in those dark fetid places,' Gompers writes, ‘when these little innocent victims of the Chinamen’s viles were under the influence of the drug, are almost too horrible to imagine. . . . There are hundreds, aye, thousands, of our American girls and boys who have acquired this deathly habit and are doomed, hopelessly doomed, beyond the shadow of redemption.'4"



Hopelessly doomed? If anyone is hopelessly doomed today, it is the user of Effexor5 who wishes to foreswear the drug. In my experience, it is simply impossible to get off of this Big Pharma 6 7 antidepressant. The drug alters brain chemistry in such a way that there is "no going home again." Of course, the drug could clearly be "kicked" in a world in which we had a right to use all other time-honored medicines, including opium. In such a world, the user could obfuscate and transcend the downsides of Effexor withdrawal. But in the age of drug prohibition, this is as close to impossible as a drug could ever come to hopelessly dooming a user to eternal use. Meanwhile, as Jim Hogshire reports in "Opium for the Masses8," the physical side of unwanted opium dependency can be conquered in a week, with the help of drugs. Moreover, millions have used opium safely on a daily basis for entire long lifetimes. I am not advocating such use – least of all in a world in which one can be arrested for taking care of their own mental health – nor am I advocating the denunciation of such use – but that does not mean that I will remain silent as we are gaslighted9 by our politicians and our materialist scientists into believing that a panacea has no positive uses whatsoever!

The reader need scarcely bother looking online for positive news about opium – since drug-war propaganda has permeated the brains of almost all writers on this topic. For the other side of the story – the non-hysterical side – I recommend two books: first, Jim Hogshire's "Opium for the Masses10," and also "The Truth about Opium" by William H. Brereton11. This latter book contains a series of lectures given during the time when the Anti-Opium Society in Britain was disseminating a Big Lie about supposed opium-caused misery in China. Brereton explains how the anti-opium movement in Britain was founded on a big lie by an American missionary, who reported that two million Chinese had died from smoking opium, which was a complete fabrication. Of course, protestant missionaries had a vested interest in stopping the Chinese from using opium: they wanted the Chinamen to put down his pipe and pick up a Christian Bible instead. In light of these motives, the outlawing of opium in the west is a religious action: it makes drug-hating Christian Science the law of the land when it comes to psychoactive medicines.

>>2613006 (You)

Notes:

1: Ceremonial Chemistry: the ritual persecution of drugs, addicts, and pushers Szasz, Thomas, Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York, 1974 (up)
2: Restoring our Right to Self-Medication: how drug warriors work together with the medical establishment to prevent us from taking care of our own health DWP (up)
3: Prohibition Blunder (up)
4: Ceremonial Chemistry: the ritual persecution of drugs, addicts, and pushers Szasz, Thomas, Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York, 1974 (up)
5: How Drug Prohibition makes it impossible to get off of Effexor and other Big Pharma drugs DWP (up)
6: How Drug Company Money Is Undermining Science Seife, Charles, Scientific American, 2012 (up)
7: Why Is Biopharma Paying 75% of The FDA’s Drug Division Budget? LaMartinna, John, Forbes, 2022 (up)
8: Opium for the Masses: Harvesting Nature's Best Pain Medication Hogshire, Jim (up)
9: How psychologists gaslight us about beneficial drug use DWP (up)
10: Opium for the Masses: Harvesting Nature's Best Pain Medication Hogshire, Jim (up)
11: The Truth About Opium by William H. Brereton DWP (up)

https://abolishthedea.com/americas_big_lie_about_opium.php

See >>2604065 (You)
chinese didn't suffer from opium, they suffered from colonial powers, they suffered from the civil war, the feudal regime, and warlord Mao. All drugs have uses, hundreads of thousands of ailments can benefit users according ONLY to their own personal needs and desires when the costs and benefits have been weighted.

File: 1766683493905.png (1.14 MB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

YEA I'M AGAINST THE WAR ON DRUGS, I JUST WANT TO PROHIBIT EVERY SUBSTANCE I DON'T UNDERSTAND OR AM SCARED OF BECAUSE IT CAN HARM PEOPLE!!

SUCH SCIENCE, SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION. LOL. LMAO.
DRUG CAUSES ADDICTION, ADDICTION IS LE BAD! LET ME PROHIBIT!

COFFEE CAUSES ADDICTION? HMMM. LET ME BE A BIG MAN AND SAY IF I WAS IN CHARGE I WOULD SHOOT ALL THE COFFEE DEALERS.
WHATS THAT? DXM CAUSES ADDICTION TOO? I'LL PROHIBIT COUGHING SYRUP.
I'M A BIG BOY, DON'T CALL ME WODIGGER, I'M LEGALIZING YOUR WEED, YOU'LL ONLY GET 1 GRAM IF YOU HAVE A TUMOR. YOU'LL GET THE FIRING SQUAD WHEN THE REVOLUTION HAPPENS!1!!!1!!!

>>2569907
/leftypol/ wasn't really a splinter of /lit/ it came about because 8/pol/ would basically ban anyone who wasn't constantly jacking it to trump and great replacement theory which made it an insufferable echo chamber and lead every political tendency to do their own version of /pol/ even Neo-nazis that didn't like trump, orthodox fascists and salafists got their own boards

I swear the /lit/ thing is just some cope by pseudes here to convince themselves they're not connected to the trashfire of /pol/

>>2613021
You can believe whatever you want I guess

>>2613019
why do drug addicts always try to compare their meth habits to harmless shit like coffee
smoking anything at all damages your lungs. coffee will never give anyone lung cancer not even if they take 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000mg per year.

>>2613039
We're not addicts, you're a fucking scumbag american WODIGGER. Addiction is a political term, you are SUCKING NIXON'S DICK LOL DUMB STALINIST, YOU'RE NOT A SCIENTIST, YOUR SOCIALISM IS NOT SCIENTIFIC, YOU'RE A FUCKING CONSERVATIVE RETARD.
ALL OF YOU.
ALL DRUGS CAN CAUSE HARM, IT IS THE USERS WHO DECIDE WHAT IS WORTH USING. YOU WILL NEVER GET RID OF DRUG USE LMAO.

>>2613042
Also in support of this point, drug abuse issues are 99% caused by social conditions not the actual drug lol

>>2613044
Theres a reason aboriginals in Australia are harming themselves huffing gas while nobody else in the world is, but the WOD agitator will never figure it out.

death to drugs

>>2613056
Drugs never die
WODiggers die

Drug - A psychoactive substance of which racist and xenophobic politicians disapprove, chiefly because they associate its use with people whom they dislike. As opposed to "med".

Med - A psychoactive substance of which politicians approve because it turns users into wards of the pharmaceutical industry without empowering them to live large.

>>2613075
Tylenol causes autism whereas crystal meth cures autism. True.

>>2613077
MAOIs cure cancer whereas laughing gas causes cancer. A statement.

I always wondered why one of us has never made a Wikipedia article about this site

>>2613125
Cause glowpedia is a literal imperialist propaganda outlet
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia
and any article on leftypol would only serve to slander

druggies big mad

wodiggies waaa waa


Unique IPs: 13

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]