Why did the British colonial system in India formalize and exploit an indigenous social system that posits a fundamental moral inequality between groups of people?
Would it have been better that the British impose the imperialist European values of universal human dignity and rights on their colonial subjects?
So Brahmin men had or have harems of women of all classes ready to take their seed?
So, not only are you too retarded to know about divide and conquer, but then you also don‘t notice the contradiction of speaking about universal human dignity and rights for *colonial subjects*. Yeah, I‘m sure a lot of dignity and rights are involved when your family is starving to death in slave like labor conditions under colonial rule.
the caste system is also in plato's republic and i believe aristotle describes it going back to egypt
its just class.
nothing particularly "british".
>>2573109if you're asking these questions you are so off in your own assumptions and false assessments that no answer given is really going to help you.
Read. Read a LOT more.
>>2573161Cow piss is more expensive than Milk in India. That would be funny if that's not even ancient Indian tradition either and just something the Brits pranked them into doing.
The Indian government is the number one holder of patents for cow urine worldwide.
>Today, the Indian government holds more than a dozen patents related to cow urine and has filed applications for them in nearly 150 countries. Many nations, including the United States, France and South Korea, have recognized these, but not India, which has much stricter standards for patents. For now.