[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1764171803443.jpg (5.14 KB, 250x250, 702125542.jpg)

 

Feels like most people seriously think communism boils down to educating people, lol. Even those who associate communism only with their idea of the party, who even came up with that? They are mixing up the role of the party with any random group that slaps "communist party" on their name. The party is basically the brain of the class, the class' political and economic expression of its program. It is not some random ideological point, it is an unavoidable necessity. No other economic form that emerges can replace the role of the party. Like there can be antagonism between the class' economic and political necessities but most people treat the party as if it's separate to the proletarian movement, imposing its will from outside, when it emerges from the class' own needs.

>>2574311
>No other economic form that emerges can replace the role of the party.
Tell me why. Explain it like you would to a child.

>>2574311
>most people treat the party as if it's separate to the proletarian movement, imposing its will from outside, when it emerges from the class' own needs.
it might emerge that way, but parties can become revisionist and/or self destructive, like the CPSU did. Did the class "need" the CPSU to dissolve the USSR?

Communism is a mode of production

The rest of your post is vauge in purpose and irrelevant to the starting topic.

As an angsty teenager I read a lot existensialist philosophy and got this urge do actually change things but it always amounted to poetry or philosophy, two practices that rarely have consequences or historical meaning. Idealist voluntarism describes it pretty good. Marxism on the other hand gave me the understanding that to actually impose my will is impossible and the best I can hope for was to understand the mores of the times and not have my will deviate from the mores, too much. And the way to actually impose any kind of will is to impose the inevitable "will" of the class, which is to say to pursue the class interest of the proletariat.

A kind of schizophrenia ocurrs when you try to cross voluntarist approaches to social revolution. The only way to actually pursue the solutions to the problems Marxism presents itself is to practice real life, dirty-Jewish politics. You have to push proletarian association wherever you are. For me this amounts forcing people to organize into whichever kind of structures while presenting my case, the communist case, as everyone's case. There's no granduer to it essentially and most of my escapades lead to dead ends. Most people think I'm a complete weirdo probably, because communism, organization, class and the proletarian movement is the only thing I talk about in general (when I'm not talking about work).


Unique IPs: 4

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]