[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1764916063959.png (2.01 MB, 1192x1200, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Which is the real and correct way of material analysis?
General Relativity?
Quantum Mechanics?
Quantum Gravity?
M Theory?
???

No teleology answers.

These.

>you can only pick one
no

and the answer was lysenkoism

As long as what you go with isn't compatible with string theory you'll be fine. If it's compatible with string theory it's unscientific nonsense.

>>2584263
Having hereditary breasts from your mother's silicon implants doesn't explain existence or matter, it just explains why you're a fat retard

>Which is the real and correct way of material analysis?
dialectical materialism

>>2584283
Yes but which way of material analysis tard

>>2584285
I already told you.

>>2584286
Philosophizing rat lol, I already wrote it on the thread for you, no teleology answers

>do you believe in General Relativity or Quantum Mechanics?

>>2584290
Quantum gravity fan consult your opponent >>2584273

>>2584259
>glownonymous
>muh teleology
Are you a transgendah?

>>2584298
<In general, the word "materialistic" serves many of the younger writers in Germany as a mere phrase with which anything and everything is labeled without further study, that is, they stick on this label and then consider the question disposed of.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_08_05.htm

>>2584259
are Those analysis? aRent thOse theOries or hypotheses or whatever, No?

>>2584259
I bet you dont even believe in facts calling the fetish factish, so material analysis is probably not even a thing for you. Also you are probs a scientific anti realist or something

>>2584324 (me)
*calling them factish

>>2584324
Give your facts to the baryon asymmetry problem

>>2584333
So, there are no facts then? Is that what you are saying? So marx didnt use facts in his research because theres no such thing?

>>2584334
So you're an underage fag who can't read, got it.

QM

>>2584335
So you are a millenial trccn, got it.

>>2584333
>>2584334
Did you just reply to yourself immediately after as though you were expecting a within-the-hour response on a non-4chan, non-livechan imageboard?

>>2584283
Read Althusser's ''Philosophy and the
Spontaneous Philosophy
of the Scientists''
https://archive.org/details/philosophysponta0000alth
http://www.marx2mao.com/Other/PSPS90NB.html


Unique IPs: 6

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]