Article 24 of DPRK constitution
<The state protects private property and guarantees the right to inherit them by law.
Chapter 2 of Communist Manifesto
<Democracy would be wholly valueless to the proletariat if it were not immediately used as a means for putting through measures directed against private property and ensuring the livelihood of the proletariat […] Limitation of private property through progressive taxation, heavy inheritance taxes, abolition of inheritance through collateral lines (brothers, nephews, etc.) forced loans, etc.
Who was correct, here?
What Marx means here are means of production. The means of production (land, industry, infrastructure, heavy machinery, etc.) are nationalized, so the private property that exists is personal property. This is literally socialism 101.
Less leftypolling, more reading, anon.
>>2597542i'm p sure he means toothbrushes and funkopops
>>2597644A WORKER IS NOT A SLAVE
READ A BOOK
>>2597647Engels said the only distinction between wage slavery and slavery proper is the ostensible freedom to choose the slaver. Many DPRK workers lack that distinction.
>>2597650the choices the DPRK has
>socialist construction (literal slavery)or
>freedom and prosperity (70% cities bombed to the ground, shock therapy, child prostitutes and the rape and pillage of their state so imperialists can prolong their orgy a bit further) >>2597656>>socialist constructionAlso known as selling your workers to foreign capital so kimmy and his backers get to have a new pool
>>2597657whatever you and your imperialist propaganda say
>>2597659My country is currently occupied by imperialists that you no doubt support
>>2597657>Foreign capitalWhich foreign capital? The houses they build for their own people that no foreigner or foreign corporation can own? Are you retarded?
>>2597644How many times are you going to post this dumb article?