Literally zero people have read Bukharin. Outside of a couple of rather pointless works that anyone could have cobbled together, most of his crap remains untranslated. I've read his pieces on SOIC, and it's the most pathetic shit ever. I say you can trace how consistent he is with most of his works on the subject of socialism in Russia alone, but he makes the case himself. He was a cowardly neurotic who couldn't sit through meetings and sided with Stalin to protect his little fiefdom.
NEP lost
Reading that Stalin actually opposed Bukharin's execution really made me realize that Stalin was a fucking dumbass coward.
His dunk on keynesianism is pretty good
Is there even a book where he explains his programme (which went against ZTALIN)
>>2598882Why did they kill him anyway then?
I've really only read his book refuting austrian economics
As with all Bukharin threads ill just make the points now so you can leave more enlightened and ignore all the other posts. 1. Deng Won 2. Bukharin was proven right 3. All states must progress through the capitalist mode of production 4. Stalin caused the holocaust because his strategy of social fascism ruined the KPDs chances of forming an electoral coalition with the SPD. 5. Tukhachevsky was a genius and Stalin was a brainlet who got millions of Soviets killed by sacking him. 6. The confessions were extracted under duress. 7. Stalin caused the fall of the soviet union by killing all the actual communists and replacing them with professional cock polishers. 8. People who think Bukharin was wrong are basically retarded and believe in made up nonsense. 9. Every single source from the period is tainted by NKVD propaganda and rewriting history. 10. All the evidence in the moscow trials was doctored by the NKVD and the charges were trumped up crap a child could come up with. Ill end with the traditional Stalin was a retard and so was collectivization. The Nazi's were always going to lose to the USSR in every single timline NEP or no. Goodbye see you next Bukharin thread!
>>2599187absolute brainlet take, from the fake histories to muh great men
>>2599187I was starting to be fond of Deng but your retarded takes are pushing me away.
>>2599187this made me laugh hard.
bukharin won, stalin lost
>>2599187>bukharin was right but he also did nothing about it even though the fate of the first socialist state was at stakethat just makes him look worse
Also, buharin was a vulgar mechanical materialist and didn't understand dialectics so he was cringe
>>2599104Leftypol didn’t exist back then, execution was the only way to prove you’d won an argument