>>2600673>Trotsky was basically an Osama Bin Laden type figurePlease elaborate this batshit claim
>that railed against Stalin because Stalin didn't immediately abolish the state,Again, elaborate where exactly Trotsky advocates to immediately abolish the state, because I've read most of his major works and I can't even tell what you're hinting at
> abolish the family,He protested that banning abortion, hiding info about birth control, and shutting down programs for communal cooking etc. thereby chained Soviet women down with housework and made them unable to participate in a larger socialist society. If you disagree with Trotsky on this point please let everyone here know.
>pursue muh "permanent revolution" aka embroil the USSR into ill-fated warsPermanent Revolution is misunderstood even by a lot of Trotskyists, but what it ultimately boils down to is that a socialist party should never water down their political program and goals in order to form a coalition with pro-capitalist parties. This is basic bitch Marxist political strategy that goes back all the way to 1848 and Louis Blanc, when Marx (not Trotsky) originally formulated the concept. Compare this to Stalin's political strategy in the "popular front" period, wherein the Communist Parties moved to the right of socdems in order to cuck themselves out to liberals, even reaching the new low of supporting "no strike pledges" during WWII - basically a repeat of the SPD revisionists' support for "civil peace" (burgfrieden) during WWI. Again, if you support this latter policy, please let everyone know.
>How dare that Stalin works worth the material conditions and historical contextI think the bald fact that the Stalin regime's economic policy made such drastic zigzags (fighting against Trotsky et al's calls for gradual socialization of the economy before 1929, then abruptly trying and failing to force collectivization over the course of four years) puts his understanding of "material conditions" into question
>and develop the state to advance proletarian interests – it's all "bureaucracy"What interest does a worker have in accelerating wage inequality? What interest does he have in tyrannical management in industry and censorship and repression in political affairs? Trotsky's critique of bureaucracy is valid because to him bureaucracy is the antithesis of democracy. Nobody on the left seems to understand this because of the burger-brained assumption of bureaucracy being a problem of "too much procedure", an argument which is typically aimed
against democratic control.
>After all this it becomes clear the justification for Stalin's "purges" of these terrorist assholes trying to destroy the USSR.The only evidence for Trotskyist "terrorism", "fascist collaboration" etc. comes from the coerced confessions made during the Moscow trials. No direct evidence has ever surfaced in any archive for anything like the vast conspiracy the Soviet state alleged (and later themselves admitted was bullshit).