The graph going around showing "men becoming conservative" is hilarious because the female line is the one going nearly exponential whereas the male one just droops a bit.
Its easy to explain. Its simply the fact that women largely derive their opinions from social cues, and that social media has given a platform to narcissistic behaviour.
So you end up with women trying to out do each other by being the most hardcore social aligner possible.
Not beating the "gets all their opinions from thinktanks and tweet summarizer youtubers" alligations.
bitches be shoppin
>>2602384Remember all those articles talking about how women were taking up guns to fight the Taliban as the US withdrew from Afghanistan? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Radwives will become a meme
>>2602591god I want a radwife to dom me
>>2602384The rise of the current post-racial male centered conservatism feeds this.
Desire for blonde Reactionary Tradwives ended. Now bobcut black haired radical girls are my new best type.
>>2602384Why are the only women I see at organizing events trans then?
>>2603000yea, i think you made that up.
Has never been true and in the 20 years i've been around leftist events and spaces.
>>2603547Are you on the ground these days?
It's like one cis women (they all have they/them pronounouns) for a dozen t girls.
I have nothing against women trans or not just interesting.
>>2602394>>2603076I think autisms have a tendency to attribute allistic traits to the other sex when they don't have many autisms of the other sex in their friend group(s).
>rar, women just shopping, texting, eat hot chip and lie>ruh, men just yell about sportsball, roman empire and get stuck in caves insead of going therapyLike they're just complaining about allistics but lack the vocabulary so it's easy to manipulate them into being sexist about it.
>>2603552You just live where there's a lot of trans people.
>they all have they/them pronounounsOkay so they're all trans then.
>>2602394mods, execute this reactionary
>>2602384>The graph going around showing "men becoming conservative" is hilarious because the female line is the one going nearly exponential whereas the male one just droops a bit.HOT TAKE:The gender divide in radicalization is analogous to why socialist revolutionaries tend to be class traitors.
>>2603559I'm not sure I would include theyfabs as being trans. I don't think they have gender dysphoria, they don't transition, they just don't like to be called women.
It is a sort of liberal feminist ideal that if you strip off the label you are no longer the thing despite living in the same relationships to material
>>2603627>I'm not sure I would include theyfabs as being trans.Twitterbabble doesn't matter. They're clearly some type of non-binary. Cut that shit out before you develop black coffee syndrome.
>I don't think they have gender dysphoriaVibes, and that's not what trans means. Transness is literally just not being cis. That's it.
>>2603627Like if you want a narrower category to feel special and legitamized for being a part of, then find a narrower category than 'trans,' because that is in fact a very broad category.
>>2603689>>2603702Ok I'll bite.
What is "being trans" then
>>2602971>bobcutnot short enough
A lot of reactionary thought boils down to "total woman enslavement" and liberalism no longer feels like a safe refuge, in fact liberalism is accelerating its own death by trying to be more like rightoidism. So women turn to the thing that makes them feel like they'll be safer which is to radicalize.
>>2603734Young women call themselves nonbinary to appear edgy and radical, men do it to prey on these women. They are in no way comparable to some 40 year old balding transhumanist, except for maybe that it is all bullshit to begin with.
>>2603746Agreed if a cis dude is they/theming it up they're a chaser
>>2603734Ok pretend I'm an idiot,
What is cis then?
>why do women behave like women
truly a mystery
Why is Leftypol so misogynistic nowadays?
>>2603807Because "leftypol" is a lightly moderated anonymous message board where anyone can just come and say anything with little to no consequences
>>2602384>>2602591>>2602971Once the Global Maoist Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution begins in the future Global USSR, all Women will be given 60 days to get their Hair Cut/Chopped/Shaved off, either at home or at a People’s Barbershop by Female International Red Guards, and once the 60 day window passes, Female (Mostly Lesbian) International Red Guards will patrol the streets looking for Women with Reactionary Bourgeois Patriarchal Hair styles (anything longer then a Pixie Cut), and if/when they find one, they will Shave her head, have her walk through the streets wearing a Dunce Cap, attend a Struggle Session wearing a placard that says Revisionist/Bourgeois/Reactionary/Patriarchal, and send her to a Re-Education Camp to embrace the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the Highest Stage of Marxism, so She can become a Liberated Socialist Woman and begin traveling the Shining Path to Communism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️💇♀️👩🦲!
>>2603746Not a real thing that happens at any significant scale. Get off twitter.
>>2603770Being the gender you were assigned at birth.
What do my fellow Comrades think of my Dialectical Materialist Effort Post at
>>2603819 detailing the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist solution to purge the Superstructural symbols of Patriarchal Bourgeois Femininity/Domesticity in order to flatten the Reactionary Gender Binary in the Global Maoist Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in the future Global USSR, by forcing all Women to have extremely Short Hair (Pixie Cut or shorter, with a Shaved Head being the most Historically Progressive), ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️💇♀️👩🦲🤔?
>>2603983Nobody wants to hear your strange fetishes. I, a fellow comrade, think jannies should clean it up quicker.
>>2603962
>Have you tried to organize these days?
Yeah, people there touch grass so they're not playing weird twitterian chess with their gender presentation, and that'd be an unhinged thing to speculate of someone.
>Green hair
>ZOMG scary unconventional accessorization!!!1! (drug store brand hair dye)
This is the black coffee syndrome I was talking about. You see veriety and see that as an infringement on your own personal choice because it means the choices you made cease to be as normal as they were before you noticed the veriety. Knowing that people are having coffee with milk or tea demotes your black coffee to being merely an option rather than the default option, seeing hair dye does the same to your choice of haircut. Seeing ethnic minorities makes your future hyperborean tradwife an unhinged preference rather than the expectation, etc…
There's a kernel of this in most reactionary thought.
>>2603975
>So by your logic a trans person is a person with a different gender then they are born with.
Yeag
>>2602384The generalization and shaming of "radicalization", which is just recognizing that there's systems – is crazy.
That definition would put Nick Fuentes as a radical.
>>2603807Alot of women engage with hyper idpol that rejects class analysis and often rejects other oppressed identities in an effort to get more attention.
Many of which'll argue that women are the empathetic gender, when they deeply struggle to see perspective of other genders, or races, or income brackets (among proles, obviously fuck bourgeois), etc.
Me personally, I got sexist towards women after talking to feminists and women online; just was constantly disappointed with them and saw them as nothing but just scratched liberals.
Because of that I've been taking shrooms and doing self CBT to try and de-spook my brain, (though it's not like they aren't out there and getting x-million likes for political dogshit).
All of which in retrospect that, even if you argue XYZ book that would contextualize how to approach and interpret those people, (which many don't), it's still makes you wonder since at some point you need to listen to the masses, and ask yourself:
> Are they really that just reactionary, and am I just in denial? >>2603746>if a cis dude is they/themingBut are they really cis at that point? Pronouns are a large part of gender.
>>2603950>Being the gender you were assigned at birth.What's it called if society's views of gender change after you were born so you no longer fulfill your assigned gnder? Cis-classic?
>>2604026>What's it called if society's views of gender change after you were born so you no longer fulfill your assigned gnder?It's never even occurred to me that could happen but I bet it has. Banger essay premise.
>>2604019>Alot of women [thing every demographic has examples of under SEO web]waow
>Me personally, I got sexist towards women after talking to feminists and women online;Ah, twitter overdose. Follow
>>>/lgbt/5580 's advice and you may find yourself less mentally ill.
>>2603986Forcing all Women to have extremely Short Hair (Pixie Cut or shorter, with a Shaved Head being the most Historically Progressive) is not a “Strange Fetish”, it is Dialectal Materialist Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Praxis that was implemented in the IRL Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in Maoist China and will be implemented in the Global Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in the future Global USSR, whether Revisionists, Liberals, Fascists, and Women brainwashed to accept the Superstructural symbols (ie. Long Hair, Dresses, Makeup, etc.) of Patriarchal Bourgeois Femininity/Domesticity and the Reactionary Gender Binary like it or not, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️💇♀️👩🦲!
>>2604118
>I just see it for what it is mostly alienating for the masses.
AKA projecting yourself onto a strawman of a steel mill worker you have in your head.
>Most of the world still follows the gender binary with a few exceptions.
Pandering to preconceptions never won any concessions before and it's naive to think it'll magically start doing so now. Chuds aren't / shouldn't be joining your org, and the normal but sheltered layman learns quick and doesn't have to grapple with these concepts comprehensively to cooperate. I have no fucking clue what a therian is even after having watched a video about it, but the 3 at my org are all easy to work with.
>We don't see people self identifying as Faye/Fayeself outside of the west.
Vibes. Only twitter users think in this manner. Please actually talk with non-westerners (AKA get off twitter) regularly instead of projecting yourself onto a stawman of them you have in your head.
>>2604118
Also, reality check: people join orgs because they want to build socialism, because they are proletarian and see it as necessary. Not because the atmosphere was nice and everyone there is a hyperborean tradwife. Kill the marketing / PR team in your head and embrace materialism.
>>2603819The oldest and most natural hairstyle for both men and women, long hair, is apparently bourgeois, despite pre-dating the existing of the bourgeoisie as a class by millenia
Ok idiot
>>2604221That's Kind Lear, he's admitted it's a fetish before, don't worry about it.
>>2604221You are right that Men having Long Hair is not Bourgeois or Reactionary because in most cases it doesn’t explicitly symbolize Femininity or Masculinity, but Long Hair on Women is not just Bourgeois, it is inherently Patriarchal and Reactionary due to the fact it symbolizes the the Reactionary Gender Binary in Capitalist, Feudal, and Slave societies, with Long Hair, Dresses, and Makeup on Women all symbolizing Reactionary Patriarchal Femininity which is Psychologically coded as a weak “Object” in juxtaposition with the Strong Masculine “Subject”, thus reinforcing Sexist Male dominance over Women, which is why when Women have their Hair Cut/Chopped/Shaved off, they are Metaphorically breaking the Reactionary Superstructural Chains of Patriarchy and Bourgeois Femininity/Domesticity, thus it is a mandatory Rite of Passage to destroy all symbols of Reactionary “Culture”/“Beauty Standards” that kept Women oppressed for thousands of years, and become a Liberated Socialist Woman that can begin traveling the Shining Path to Communism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️💇♀️👩🦲!
>>2604228I will admit that I find Women with extremely Short Hair (including Bald Women) much more attractive then Women with Long Hair, but that is not the main reason I support this policy, as it is Dialectal Materialist Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Praxis that was implemented in the IRL Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in Maoist China (Any Women with Long Hair in Maoist China was forced to get the “Yin-Yang” Cut, in which half their Head was Shaved by the Red Guards, with Mao stating that Women having Two braids was Feudalist, One Braid was Capitalist, and Shoulder length Hair was Revisionist) and will be implemented in the Global Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in the future Global USSR, whether Revisionists, Liberals, Fascists, and Women brainwashed to accept the Superstructural symbols (ie. Long Hair, Dresses, Makeup, etc.) of Patriarchal Bourgeois Femininity/Domesticity and the Reactionary Gender Binary like it or not, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🚀☢️💇♀️👩🦲!
>>2602394guy who gets all his opinions from andrew tate:
women get all their opinions from youtubers :((((
Unique IPs: 23