How did dialectical materialism became mistaken for mechanical materialism?

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

How did dialectical materialism became mistaken for mechanical materialism? Anonymous 22-12-25 00:31:31 No.2608232

The majority of leftypol users are not using dialectial materialism, but mechanical materialism. How did this happen and how do we fix it?
I've been using this website for a while and pretty much whenever I tell people to propagandize, agitate, educate and whatnot I get told "that's useless, you're a liberal minded retard" and when I ask what we should do then I get two answers
>thing nobody in this website will do, like making a guerrilla group or firebombing a walmart or some other very drastic shit that screams main character fantasies
>doing nothing. Just read more books.
And the reason every single time is vulgar mechanical materialism disguised as dialectics. Discuss.

Anonymous 22-12-25 00:33:00 No.2608236

Dialectics are shit and more importantly not real

Anonymous 22-12-25 00:40:41 No.2608253

>>2608236
Spotted the anglo

Anonymous 22-12-25 00:42:02 No.2608257

Materialism has not meaningfully advanced since Lucretius.

Anonymous 22-12-25 01:02:15 No.2608307

File: 1766365335204.jpg (33.15 KB, 500x500, kys.jpg)

>"The essence of the “new” trend, which adopts a “critical” attitude towards “obsolete dogmatic” Marxism, has been clearly enough presented by Bernstein and demonstrated by Millerand. Social-Democracy must change from a party of social revolution into a democratic party of social reforms

<What is To Be Done?

Anonymous 22-12-25 01:15:05 No.2608331

Dialectical materialism is, at bottom, a philosophy of science; a set of metaphysical and epistemological claims and concepts that are treated as given and to be used as starting points for further analysis. Learning a brand new way of thinking about knowledge itself is extremely hard, and within that realm dialectical materialism is fairly complex compared to, say, positivism. As such, most people either don't try, or hit a weird half-way point where they kind of get it but not really.

>>2608307
Why are people so eager to shut down discussion on a site that's dedicated to it?

Anonymous 22-12-25 06:19:01 No.2608557

>>2608331
I think he just wanted to post that pic and text, he posted it in some others.

Anonymous 22-12-25 06:22:54 No.2608560

>>2608232
>The majority of leftypol users are not using dialectial materialism
yeah they do

Anonymous 22-12-25 09:42:31 No.2608661

>>2608560
No they don’t
Most of this board are metaphysical idealists and can more accurately be called fascists than anything else, at least ideologically

Most are also stupid american subhumans so they cannot recognize that their version of “socialism” is indistinguishable from a ᴉuᴉlossnW rant

At any rate they should be executed in their homes in front of their families mostly to gauge the reactions of the latter

Unique IPs: 8