/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Any ML party founded after 1991.

One of the things that might distinguish fascism from other forms of right-wing authoritarian conservatism is precisely that it does this. But nevertheless in a contradictory manner the few real fascist governments that came to power had a preference for non-fascist authoritarian conservatives in other countries. ᴉuᴉlossnW was more partial to the Stahlhelm in Germany than the NSDAP, while Hitler's preferred puppets were crusty monarchists and military men who disciplined their own domestic pet fascists unless the situation was really extreme (Croatia) or towards the end of the war when local psychotic fascists like in Hungary took direct power in October 1944.

This is at least one of the narratives running through "A History of Fascism" by Stanley Payne which I'm almost done with. Payne is a politically conservative historian who makes occasional snide attacks at communism, but the book covers a bunch of these fascist parties in 1920s/1930s including minor ones like the French Popular Party of Jacques Doriot, who had been a senior French communist and an elected communist mayor. He flipped sides and formed a fascist party which worked as enthusiastic collaborators during the German occupation while also organizing French volunteers to be cannon fodder on the eastern front. He was killed near the end of the war in an air strike.

>>2610583
i think that has been the trend generally, however many of those would have emerged out of the pre-1991 parties. many new parties also have a much more updated analysis.

Hitler in Mein Kampf admits to taking inspiration from communists for the use of many red banners and armbands.

>>2610480
>revolutionary aesthetics
no such thing lmao, larping isnt praxis

>>2610845
Proles have fashion.
Fashion is real.

Another aesthetic thread.

>>2610845
praxis wasnt directly being discussed, nor that a given aesthetic is revolutionary in a literal sense

>>2610845
prolekult, buddy.

Surprised no one's mentioned the obvious case here with Anglo Z Gang, or Russian nationalism with Westoid characteristics.

There’s no such thing as a revolutionary aesthetic, literally anything can be captured and coopted, theory and planning strategies most of all

>>2611507
What

What a stupid question, fuck you

The Saemaul Undong. This was unironically a copy of the Chollima Movement but with capitalist characteristics

>>2610480
Christianity went from being a movement of the poor and women to being the official religion of the Roman Empire and the West in general.