fucking ACP twitter losers who have nothing better to do than admit to the world that they have no clue what they're talking about. What the hell are we supposed to do about these lobotomites(saged for ord 1)
Marxism-Leninism takes lifetime to master. Only Marxless redditor thinks scientific socialism may be grasped with Capital alone
>Reading is bad!
t. anarchist
Not surprised.
>>2618729Well at least hes reading marxism unlike 90% of posers here.
>>2618729do you claim to understand marx perfectly?
Also
>my book where I propose new system
whoever drew this picture clearly doesn't understand Marx either
>>2618729Talk of the ACP is generally frowned upon outside of /isg/, and there's a non-zero chance that this thread will end up locked and/or merged with /isg/.
>>2618732Get a job.
>>2618733He didn't say or even imply reading was bad. The point is that someone who's been studying Marxism since middle school should by all means understand Marxist theory, especially if he's part of an ostensibly Marxist party.
With that said, I do think that it's a very bad faith reading of the tweet on OP's end. There's a lot to criticize about the ACP, you don't need to misconstrue this one guy's studiousness as a flaw.
>>2618737What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges. Accordingly, the individual producer receives back from society – after the deductions have been made – exactly what he gives to it.
>>2618729Porkies are double-dipping.
Dip #1: you give them money for your Marxism books.
Dip #2: you spend your entire life reading those books and leaving the porkies alone.
I understand marxism and can predict the future with it, I predicted the socialist party in my country going socdem and then liberal
>>2618729It's a good thing that Marx and Engels wrote not one but TWO short pamphlets designed for uneducated workers to read!
Unironically you don't need anything more than that if you want to engage in praxis.
Uh… yeah. 10 years may not be enough to fully understand Marx and Engels' entire bibliography. That's normal. Why do you think people can make an entire career studying one or a few philosophers?
>>2618744You are sectarian Marxless heathen who attacks the Communist Party baselessy. If you ever had a real job, you would have self-consciousness to realize that this post
>>2618729 is ragebait for Marxless DSA sinophoboc, russiaphobic liberals who think they are vanguard by attacking true vanguard in amerika.
>>2618984"Marxism" also includes a lot more than just Marx and Engels themselves.
From my interactions with the ACP guys I found their understanding of Marxism, let alone history to be lacking. Haz himself has a good grasp and I look forward to his book, but their whole thing is clouded by Hegelianism and other such idealist thinking, let alone that this dude will say one thing one day and the exact opposite the next - dialectics lol.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
acp is dumb but it took me about 9 years of reading theory before it finally clicked
you can say oh you should have just read x y z but thats not how any of this works. you have to read the prerequisites to have the foundation to know what the fuck is going on and its impossible to know what to skip or what is important so you basically just have to read everything interesting and only learn half of it was shit after the fact
I'm ashamed to own the books that he does
I used to 'read' everything but Marx to understand Marxism like a good MLib
>classes of society
>"bosses", "state", "common man"
much materialism, very marx
>>2619074If you think ACP are ML you are the lib, fo real
>>2618729I think I know what's going on here. His modesty is affected/fake because it's a more socially acceptable way to show off what a hard-reading and aesthetically preening Marxist he is.
Admittedly I could be projecting. I'm drawing from my own memories of my parasocial attention-seeking behavior in the photos I posted as a "lit guy."
Most of the twitter responds are from Nafoids and liberals and when I think about it, this thread could have been made by one. What is wrong with actually reading and studying you dumb fuck?
The only cringe thing about the tweet is "from middle school".
OP is being a smug ass when OP doesnt understand shit about Marx.
>>2618729Having the flag of the corpse of the soviet union is so funny
Imagine trying to dunk on the ACP and exposing yourself as an even bigger retard than them lmfao. Impressive stuff
>>2618729>revolution is a return to tradition of stabilityIncurably dumb
>>2619123>be prol struggling under the weight of the world>gotta wait for clownshows like this to fill their notebooks with neat, arty-farty notessmh
>>2618995Get a job.
>>2619123>>2619723I didn't even notice that. Lmaoooo
>>2619687This is something you should have analysis for before you speak. But thank you for being humble
It must be noted that the post was created to trigger imperialists, partially those who think their "1%" and not their imperialist society that must be destroyed. That is why the Commumist Party is so advanced. The Communist Party construct classist bait and expose the rage and destructive self assuredness and Marxlessness of the imperialist left. The post is made to provoke at least 5 types of imperialists.
The pyramid basically is correct within every imperialist country. We know with certainty, for we have done the analysis for amerikkka. Amerikkka has more many more times of police officer, merchant worker, and ceo, etc. combined than proletarian.
Among working amerikan, ratio is 1 proletarian to 4.27 labor aristicrat.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htmThis is because imperialism liquidates the proletariat and makes them treatler labor aristocrat. We can refer to Communist textbook to show this is in fact a material law of imperialism. The material law of treatlerization. You must agree with the existence of this law, for it is a foundational law of imperialism.
>>2619723Read Mao analysis of China 1926. It has such distinctions. Ironic, the Marxless heathen is upset that Marxist made class analysis.
>>2619868Can you link something?
>>2619868the "state" isnt a "class", sorry to say
enjoy your traditionalist revolution anyway
>>2619870>>2619870https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_1.htmMao is so far from the heathens who attack Communist Party for saying the proletariat is rather small, and so much closer to The Party. The heathens take this factoid and make it bait for them only to cling on to, as if their criticism of revolutionary leadership of the Communist Party wasnt consciously preempted by the Party's bait. Like Mao, the Party knows the proletariat is small. Unlike the heathens, the Party and the proletariat have no interest in denying fact.
>>2619874Incorrect. Mao said government officials are bourgeois. Maoless heathen
>The petty bourgeoisie. Included in this category are the owner-peasants, [7] the master handicraftsmen, the lower levels of the intellectuals–students, primary and secondary school teachers, lower government functionaries, office clerks, small lawyers–and the small traders. >>2619881and these are all separate classes are they
mao must have been smarter than marx
>>2618729I too have a pretentious study zone, which I call "[my name]'s Idea Lab" (ok, not really), except I haven't read any leftist books in over a decade because I find them boring as fuck. The closest I get to reading about politics/geopolitics at all would be books on intelligence agencies, espionage, intrigue, etc., which are fun. But, you know, I can't help that I've always been more of an ideas person than a people person, which is why I'm more interested in reading math/logic/physics/chemistry/compsci STEM books and
some philosophy books (epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, and whatnot – not so much ethics, political philosophy, etc.). Thanks for reading my blog, and don't forget to like.
You literary hipster faggots are acting all smug here but there are maybe only 12 people in the world who truly fully grasp Marxism currently.
In the whole of history, I doubt if there has been even a total of 200 people who had that complete grasp.
>>2620501if the guy just read the communist manifesto, he would be more literate than he currently is.
>>2620501Stop larping retard
>>2620501true,not even Marx himself understood Marxism
>>2620515You use words you do not understand
can somebody tell me, why people here are still fetishizing reading in the age of AI? what is the point of reading and "understanding" (marxist) theory?
C'mon, give me a hard question. something super theoretical. with the help of grok, i will grok it to shreds just in a few seconds. i will prove that you don't need to know theory, because we have machines which are far better at theorizing than all of you combined.
>>2620620It makes people feel like they're doing something.
Lenin said "Read, read, read." Look where that got Russia.
Mao said "to read too many books is harmful." Look at where China is now.
>>2618729We can only assume that about a grand total of 30 minutes in however long this period of "studying" has been invested in actually reading based on the Russian flag in the background.
It's intentional coming from them, actually
>>2620160Yeah? Why not?
The Russian national spirit is in itself a movement towards Communism, Russia throughout history was a state built by the communes of Russian peasants. The Bolshevik revolution was in the main a decolonial revolution to overthrow the German aristocracy that had been leading Russia down the European path and re-orienting it more towards its indigenous Eurasian roots of collectivity. It used a Communist message as a rhetorical vehicle to move the Russian people into action but its main accomplishments were in rediscovering the core makeup of the Russian civilization, rescuing it from the German-French leadership of the Tsar, and re-establishing Russia in its true sense on the world stage.
Today we are seeing a renewal of the Russian civilization after it was once again forced into dormancy; the indigenous collective national spirit is being revived, with its Eurasian identity being embraced, all in rejection of the vision of an imperialist Russia within the fold of the individualist European identity which Yeltsin attempted. And this movement is under the tri-color.
No longer is it needed to wave the Communist flag in order to push the Russian people into this grand movement, the Soviets sufficiently awakened the collective spirit of the Russian people to where the red flag is no longer necessary. The tri-color no longer represents the German imperialist aristocracy, by the work of the Soviets it is impossible to "revert" to those times. That aristocracy was entirely swept away, and what is left for the tri-color to represent is the entire communal civilization of the Orthodox Russian people, including the accomplishments of the Soviet times which mesh with that national spirit, while pushing aside those elements of Soviet doctrine that, although necessary in the early 1900s, became hampers to the authentic development of the Russian civilization (ie, Soviet attacks against Orthodoxy).
>>2620660>can somebody tell me, why people here are still fetishizing reading in the age of AI?To have useful analysis that can predict future events
>>2620708What is idealism is thinking that a symbol has some metaphysical meaning eternal to all time, that the tri-color cannot represent reaction at one time and progress in the present.
>>2620691>The Russian national spiritStopped reading there lmao
>>2620620>can somebody tell me, why people here are still fetishizing reading in the age of AI? what is the point of reading and "understanding" (marxist) theory? If Stalinism emerges from the bureaucracy, what happens to bureaucrats because of AI. Shower thought.
>>2620712National psychological makeup and civilizational traits are entirely Marxist, and this was understood by even the most prominent Marxists historically such as Stalin.
They are a twitter user of course they don't get it. Marxism is incompatible with Twitterism and they think they don't understand because they want to hold on to twitterism.
Delete your twitter and move to fedi, lest you become like them.
Unique IPs: 39