The Marxist publishing grift honestly seems pretty lucrative given almost all these works are public domain so you can really just publish anything written by a name currently trending in the ideology store and make Big Bux.
Got a book a while ago called "Marxists in the Face of Fascism" that collects pre-WW2 writings on Fascism from various "left" figures and the selection of authors includes Kautsky, Togliatti, Bordiga, Stalin, and Trotsky, lmao. Just trying to target all the demographics there. It's a book for people who prefer to read names like Gramsci and Thälmann because those names are a fandom to them rather than read theory for self education I guess, because I don't see what you could actually take from such a disparate selection all presented as "equally valid".
Next they should do a book including essays by both Charles Darwin, Kent Hovind, and Herbet Spencer. Who's right? Well, that's for the reader to decide!
This should not have been a thread
>>2621236>gigapseud coping with psychobabbletheres only one communism so yep, they are that different :D
>>2621249>theres only one communismgood luck getting all the communists to agree on which one is the TRVE one
>psychobabblei don't like psychobabble either but when I see communists who agree on 90% of things wanting to kill each other over the 10% of things they disagree on, while their enemies are perfectly content to unite and crush them with much less overlap… I can't help but think of the narcissism of small differences. Even now you exemplify it perfectly.
>>2621252lol obvious booklet trying to have strong opinions on communism with wikipedia screenshots of shit entirely unrelated to it
>good luck getting all the communists to agree on which one is the TRVE onegood thing communism is the movement of the proletariat not a debate club :D
>but when I see communists who agree on 90% of things wanting to kill each other over the 10% of things they disagree onyeah dude the person who pandered to the peasantry and national bourgeoisie and other middle classes and wanted SIOC is the same as the one who focused on the global proletariat, they both thought "capitalism" le bad!!
>Even now you exemplify it perfectly.not rly, you are just a massive retard 👍
>>2621258So do you really believe Stalin and Bordiga have less in common than Charles Darwin and Kent Hovind?
>>2621258>lol obvious booklet trying to have strong opinions on communism with wikipedia screenshots of shit entirely unrelated to itOn the contrary, the more theory and history I read, the less certain I become. I am not a teenager who calls people booklet and gigapseuds while spamming emojis for a quick dopamine rush. If anything is going to create clarity rather than uncertainty, it's practice, but most communists hate each other too much to practice communism together. They're too busy trying to purge one another and splitting into new parties. :^)