[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1768052374910.jpg (14.46 KB, 250x396, Althusser.jpg)

 

Teach me about him, I skimmed his Wikipedia article and saw two sections about his romantic life and mental illness which looked interesting.
Why isn't he more well known? What has he done? What did he believe in?

He believed Karl Marx was two different people, the guy writing the manuscripts snd the manifesto who was a liberal and Marx the Marxist who wrote Capital

>>2638911
Seriously? Did he think he had some disorder?

>>2638910
>I skimmed his Wikipedia
That’s all you ever do about anything in life so why bother teaching you anything?

>>2638912
Nah it’s a joke, he believed Marx had an epistemic break from the rest of the enlightenment

File: 1768052926677.png (271.54 KB, 598x236, LastInstance.png)

There is some debate if he used shit translations of Marx to reach his conclusions, but his usage of the last instance to clarify why its difficult recognize a contradiction in practice is something worth remembering.

>>2638922
Kind of depressing to read this

>>2638922
>>2638910
this uygha admitted he didnt even read marx. just more evidence philosophy is absolutely worthless

File: 1768061052134.jpg (511.45 KB, 2160x2160, 1.jpg)

>>2638930
depressing bc its so moronic, right? literally nothing but vaguely marxist buzzwords sprinkled on vibes and aura that would only impress other morons

>>2639049
So he just made shit up?

File: 1768074507143.png (53.27 KB, 300x100, dumb-and-dumber.png)

>>2639049
>>2639058
>>2639422
>he didnt even read marx
>void where head used to be

>>2639438
Good, that means his analysis isn’t burdened

>>2638922
people with mental illnesses (such as depression) should refrain from writing theory, the mental illness colors and infuses their thinking with either schopenhauerian pessimism (depression), nietzschean sociopathy (personality disorders), or academic positivism (autists)

>>2639449
Normal, healthy people are entirely apolitical

>>2639451
normal, healthy people hate the ruling class
ask any member of the public

>>2638911
Booklet take. Althusser lays down exactly how Marx's thought matured, i.e. changed. To deny this is to worship a dogma.

>>2638914
Which is objectively correct. He and Engels enacted scientific communism, which necessarily involves a break with previous methods and views (e.g. Utopianism, etc.)

>>2639049
False & debunked. Althusser wrote a self-deprecating text while being institutionalized for killing assisting his wife to death (as she has been wishing for a decade). Anyone who touches Althusser's texts immediately recognizes an exceptionally read comrade.

>>2639058
Booklet

>>2639422
Booklet

>>2639449
>people with mental illnesses (such as depression) should refrain from writing theory
FYI Marx was depressed for the last 15yrs of his life. Engels talks about this extensively in his personal letters. You are a pseud and a fash.

>>2639464
Is althusserism real

>>2639449
>people with mental illnesses (such as depression) should refrain from writing theory, the mental illness colors and infuses their thinking with either schopenhauerian pessimism (depression), nietzschean sociopathy (personality disorders), or academic positivism (autists)
This is retarded, psychiatry is a spook

>>2638910
Do you want an actual study list?

>>2639480
Yes please anon

>>2639457
they don't, everyone is on social media, nobody knows who the ruling class is anymore

>>2639482
I. History of ideas/philosophy of science
1. Machiavelli - The Prince
2. Althusser - Machiavelli and Us
3. Rousseau - The Social Contract
4. Althusser - Montesquieu: Politics and History
5. Althusser - The Spontaneous Ideology of scientists
6. Althusser - Lenin as Philosopher

sry, I'm in a house party w Romanians, I will cont. This list

>>2639506
II. Ontology

1. Althusser - The Philosophy of the Encounter
2. For Marx

>>2639519
III. Important overview (secondary lit.)
1. Warren Montag - Althusser and His Contemporaries: Philosophy's Perpetual War

IV. Le (non-existent) controversy
1. Althusser - Reply to John Lewis (Self-Criticism)

Sorry I'm too drunk to write the comprehensive list, but this serves as a very stronk medium-rate understantink of the topic at hand.

Tl;dr: the most disgusting thing for communists is to shit on persons/things/texts they have ZERO understanding of.

Althusser did nothing wronk, kys, etc.

Maybe you could convert incels to communism by telling them about Althusser and how he killed his wife

>>2639464
marx's thought "matured" through his experience with concrete practics, not through some abstract, idealistic "epistemic break" from his past self

marx thought philosophy as obsolete, further marxist "philosophizing" is just a particular affliction of western academia, since their lack of actual revolutionary practice has them stuck in the 19th century

>>2639538
Being French disqualifies him, being part of the PCF even more so

>>2639545
>Le chauvinist anglo strikes again

>>2639542
Althusser explains EXACTLY how the epistemic break wasn't abstract, you retard booklet.

Kys, etc.

>>2639542
>marx thought philosophy as obsolete
Meanwhile, in reality:
<Old ass Marx keeps recommending ppl to read Hegel in his letters
You are a moron, a booklet, a pseud, and anti-illectual, which makes it VERY probable that you are an anglo.

>>2639550
Ho Chi Minh already explained all the problems of the PCF, which is why he broke from them

>>2639551
Intellectuals are whores and the priest caste of the capitalist order, burn every university, burn every library

>>2639555
>tools are bourgeois
<embrace hands
Pol Pot tier

>>2639554
any links where I can find Ho criticizsing the PCF please?

>>2639551
that's only because he never got around to formulating his materialist dialectic, so he advised that people just read the hegelian dialectic, and invert it like he did

but that's beside the point because the reason marx thought philosophy was obsolete is because IT WAS HEGEL WHO OBSOLETED IT

hegel ended philosophy by grounding truth in the concrete rather than abstract, in living process rather than abstract modeling

hegel killed philosophy, marx showed the next step: concrete social, political, economic practice as the method for realizing "truth"

>>2639581
>that's only because he never got around to formulating his materialist dialectic, so he advised that people just read the hegelian dialectic, and invert it like he did
Which means you admit that Marx did not in fact "end" philosophy, you retarded drooling burger? Literally look at USSR academy courses or textbooks: they were waging the materialist war INSIDE philosophy, like Marx, Engels, Lenin, etc.

>but that's beside the point because the reason marx thought philosophy was obsolete is because IT WAS HEGEL WHO OBSOLETED IT

IDIOITIC + IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
SCIENCE=NATURAL PHILOSOPHY

>Rest of the post

Peak-pseudery

Reject anglo.

Roundhouse kick anglo children into ditches.

Forcefully reeducate anglo reactionaries.

Get rid completely of anglo """culture""" in 3 decades, tops.

>>2639601
>SCIENCE=NATURAL PHILOSOPHY
Both are just impotent bifurcations of wissenschaft. Making such a distinction itself, and upholding the validity of either makes you a liberal.
There's no "philosophy", neither is there "science"
THERE IS ONLY CONCRETE POLITECONOMICAL, REVOLUTIONARY ACTIVITY

>>2639606
>There's no "philosophy", neither is there "science"
>THERE IS ONLY CONCRETE POLITECONOMICAL, REVOLUTIONARY ACTIVITY
Vulgar materialist. I bet you a multipolaroid.

>>2639632
you are not even an idealist
but rather, a dualist
tfu

>>2639506
>>2639519
>>2639532
Thank you so much anon! I hope you have a good party :D

>>2638910
Iirc his main idea is that history doesn't have a subject. In other words, the dialectic doesn't articulate itself around men and their conflicts, but rather evolves itself through institutions without men.
To give you an example, he believed that humans being alienated in their work for instance wouldn't be subject of dialectical progress, because it wasn't a structural contradiction that had to be negated.
However, the TRPF was a structural negation because capitalism relied at the same time on generating profits, which meant that when capitalism ran out of profit, it wouldn't be able to exist in its current form.

Imo he's somewhat right but he's too anti-humanist. For instance, I think that he's right that capitalism possesses its own contradictions separate from man. The previous example could serve as to explaining why we're slowly going back to a rent-based economy rather than a profit-based one. However, this forgets the purpose of revolutionary action; the point in the end _is_ to make society better for man, and not merely to advance the dialectic

but idk, I don't understand him very well.

>>2639477
Take your meds, you dumb BPD bitch

althussy

Why did he kill his wife though

>>2640554
OG leftypol user

>>2640567
I think he would've posted here if he had grown up in this era. Just going by the fact that he didn't have sex till he was 29 or something.


Unique IPs: 17

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]