>>2654815>-istLike an ism? I guess you could call him a social statist. Think of a mid 20th century social democratic policy regime of a state owned and funded welfare state, and a large state sector, but in modern day. He's no socialist, but he's one of the better leaders in the world today as a statesman.
Certainly better than Ukraine, which was once one of the major industrial center of the USSR.
Book images are from "Understanding Belarus and how western foreign policy misses the mark" by Grigory Ioffe