Big Bang theory and Mao Zedong

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options	e^nW3\Y=;<w0#JM%srV fk⛈
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1769022462917-0.png (909.41 KB, 683x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1769022462917-1.mp4 (3.66 MB, 544x266, Before Time.mp4)

Big Bang theory and Mao Zedong Anonymous 21-01-26 19:07:44 No.2658664

So this is a interesting question.
I was watching the 3 body problem and I got enlightened.

Since forever I rejected the big bang theory since it is the ultimate absurdity. Created by a literal catholic priest and pushed in the 1990s to replace what was before [UNKNOWN NAME CENSORED TODAY] the TV show is obvious propaganda how communism bad and big bang good, go sacrifice yourself for science and big bang theory.

HOWEVER all the talking points that the le bad communist say are valid ideas that I did point out before.
For example the big bang is literally impossible the big bang can not create time since anything creating time is literally impossible. Since time is needed for any action to occur nothing can create time. This means that the big bang can not happen.

This is obvious christian propaganda to introduce god. Something the le bad characters pointed out in the TV show.

This got me interested what communist of the past did write about this. Apparently Mao talked about Redshift in some publications however the only copy online is in Chinese and I was unable to find anything valid on this subject.

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:09:52 No.2658667

File: 1769022592099.png (56.17 KB, 180x210, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2658664
Only based recurring character in this show btw. should have been about her, i'd have bothered to finish and remember it.

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:11:45 No.2658670

>>2658667

Despite her being written as the cartoonish le evil communist girl she only speaks the truth.

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:18:42 No.2658685

the cosmic microwave background is observable and this thread is bad bait. yes there is a 378,000 year gap of unknown events where we can only extrapolate that the universe expanded from a singularity based on the rate of the expansion which occurs after the universe was no longer invisible. It remains the most plausible explanation, and it is not a "hole to be filled by God." Until we have a way to study events before the recombination, which occurred when the universe was an estimated 378,000 "years" "old" it will likely remain a dominant explanation in cosmology.

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:20:45 No.2658689

File: 1769023244964.jpg (178.89 KB, 1920x1080, Bazinga-Sheldon-Cooper-The….jpg)

You got em OP

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:23:08 No.2658693

>>2658685
>the cosmic microwave background is observable
???? WTF does this even mean?
Funny how this magically was not a problem before the 1990s.

>Dominant
Explain how the big bang can create time first.

>singularity
Peak garbage not different from saying MAGIC, MAGIC did it.

>the rate of the expansion
Explain how time can have a beginning first.

>observable
By who?
<Magic clergy has magic big machines, blindly believe what magic clergy tells you.

Anonymous 21-01-26 19:32:17 No.2658709

File: 1769023937583.png (101.15 KB, 340x444, ClipboardImage.png)

Unique IPs: 5