So this is a interesting question.
I was watching the 3 body problem and I got enlightened.
Since forever I rejected the big bang theory since it is the ultimate absurdity. Created by a literal catholic priest and pushed in the 1990s to replace what was before [UNKNOWN NAME CENSORED TODAY] the TV show is obvious propaganda how communism bad and big bang good, go sacrifice yourself for science and big bang theory.
HOWEVER all the talking points that the le bad communist say are valid ideas that I did point out before.
For example the big bang is literally impossible the big bang can not create time since anything creating time is literally impossible. Since time is needed for any action to occur nothing can create time. This means that the big bang can not happen.
This is obvious christian propaganda to introduce god. Something the le bad characters pointed out in the TV show.
This got me interested what communist of the past did write about this. Apparently Mao talked about Redshift in some publications however the only copy online is in Chinese and I was unable to find anything valid on this subject.
>>2658667Despite her being written as the cartoonish le evil communist girl she only speaks the truth.
the cosmic microwave background is observable and this thread is bad bait. yes there is a 378,000 year gap of unknown events where we can only extrapolate that the universe expanded from a singularity based on the rate of the expansion which occurs after the universe was no longer invisible. It remains the most plausible explanation, and it is not a "hole to be filled by God." Until we have a way to study events before the recombination, which occurred when the universe was an estimated 378,000 "years" "old" it will likely remain a dominant explanation in cosmology.
>>2658685>the cosmic microwave background is observable???? WTF does this even mean?
Funny how this magically was not a problem before the 1990s.
>DominantExplain how the big bang can create time first.
>singularityPeak garbage not different from saying MAGIC, MAGIC did it.
>the rate of the expansionExplain how time can have a beginning first.
>observableBy who?
<Magic clergy has magic big machines, blindly believe what magic clergy tells you. >>2658709Please leave the 4chan memes in 4chan
>>2658693<the cosmic microwave background is observable>???? WTF does this even mean?You really shouldn't be commenting on anything if that term doesn't even ring a bell for you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background Scientists today don't believe singularities can exist, nor do they believe that the big bang is a theory. It's merely a description of what we detect when we look out to the beginning of the universe.
There's dozens of hypotheses on the nature of the universe. All we can say for certain is that there is a massive expansion (still ongoing btw, and at an increasing rate), and that the universe used to be hotter and more energetic but now it isn't.
Facts. Cosmology is philosophy with some equations tacked on at the end. Its as scientific as arguing whether Krishna or Brahma is the biggest god.
>maybe the universe popped into existence ex nihilo just ignore that im a priest
>maybe the universe is vibrating strings just ignore that this is straight out of the zohar and im a jew
>maybe nothing exists until we observe it just ignore that postmodernism is blowing up as i introduce this idea
>none of our numbers work so maybe theres spooky dark matter and dark energy bleeding in from other universes
>we still have no idea how to make the big bang work without catholicism like that priest wanted so maybe theres an infinite amount of universes and they create each other
>maybe the universe collapses into a singularity and has a new big bang forever
>maybe a new universe splits off every time we make a decision
>maybe the universe is a simulation
Absolute midwit coal
There's like 25+ different theories for why the universe exists that are debated amongst physicists and it'd take too long to list or explain them all here.
Maybe our universe is just a region in an infinite space time that rapidly inflated?
Maybe it was birthed due to quantum tunneling?
Maybe strings caused it?
Maybe it expands in cycles and repeats?
Maybe it's the accident of higher dimensional membranes colliding?
Maybe we're inside a black hole of a higher dimensional universe?
Maybe with each big bang the direction of time reverses?
Maybe a universe is a bubble of quantum foam that exists as a rare fluctuation in a great nothingness?
Maybe reality is just time expanding out from a low entropy point to high entropy and the big bang is the point of lowest entropy?
Maybe the laws of physics change over time and light moved faster in the past creating the illusion of a big bang?
Maybe we're inside a universe scale quantum computer and being fucked around with by things beyond our comprehension, to whom our universe is relatively tiny and unimportant?
We just don't have a fucking clue.
>>2666555>Cosmology is philosophy with some equations tacked on at the endAnd yet as much as people cope with this, the universe still continues to exist without explanation as to how or why
>>2658664>The general theory of relativity was utilized to propagate various kinds of idealistic and creationist views of the world, e.g., the so called big bang theory>This was to neutralize the fall in density of matter as the universe expanded in the so called Big Bang model of the universehttps://cpim.org/dialectical-materialism-question-black-holes/
>In particular, it is true that mathematical abstractions were misused to derive, from Einstein’s relativity theory, conclusions about the Big Bang, or creation of the universe, and the Black hole, which blocks all information, and thus sets a limit on the knowability of the world.>There is no limit to this growth of attraction. This property is what lies at the base of deriving the conclusions about the Big Bang and the Black hole.>Recent researches have testified to the truth of this observation. The conclusion that the world was created by the Big Bang was falsified by the steady state theory of Hoyle and Narlikar. https://cpim.org/engels-modern-science/
>Many of these results are based on the big bang “model” of theformation of the universe. Scientists today largely accept that this
“origin” does not therefore a moment of creation (with all its
uncomfortable theological sounding implications of this term) and
that this model breaks down in describing what appears to be the
“origin” of the universe and space and time.
https://cpim.org/wp-content/uploads/old/marxist/201004-dialectical-materialism-jayram.pdf >>2658664I remember hearing about how various Trot groups rejected the Big Bang model. Recent example:
https://marxist.com/the-big-bang-shoehorning-the-facts-to-fit-the-theory.htm I got into an argument with trots over this lol IRL in a talk I was doing about On Contradiction. Your philosophy should never come above material reality, and there is evidence for the Big Bang having taken place, or at least thats what the evidence points too.
The GPCR sections in this show are so based lol even though its anticommunist and fascist (and so is the book). The observatory woman who sent the message to the San-Ti's dad deserved to have been killed because he was a liberal.
>create time
I always found the theoretical approach that postulates time doesn't actually exist as a fundamental dimension of reality to be most convincing.
>>2658664It's completely un-Marxist to think that people believe in God or liberal democracy because of whatever quantum or gravity gobbledygook that the vast majority of workers do not really understand or care about. The same goes for eugenics and genetics. You have to understand that Lenin was arguing for revolution at a time when peasants believed in the divine right of kings.
>>2666781What do you mean? Isnt it self-evident that it is a dimension? Like you cant describe movement of objects without factoring in time dimension.
>>2658693the cosmic microwave background was discovered in 1964. I don't know what you mean by the 1990s.
>>2666617Maybe that’s a sign we should give up on trying to understand or explain it in the first place
>>2666555>Cosmology is philosophy with some equations tacked on at the end.Science is guided by philosophy, yes. This isn't an own.
>>2667424>Science is guided by philosophyThis is some serious bullshit only philosophers themselves regurgitate mindlessly, lmfao.
>>2667424wow profound. congratulations on reaching ancient greek thought
sorry but marx cooked with this
>>2667277love the pop science, keep it up fellas
>confusing secular philosophy with religionback in the 19th century marx already called philosophy "religion rendered into thought and hence to be condemned" and youre here in 2026 defending literal ideology. you ARE a midwit
>>2658670>Despite her being written as the cartoonish le evil communist girl she only speaks the truth.They tried to make her evil but she kept being right and mogging the middle class PMCs who worked at a london uni i couldn't give a shit about.
dogshit show honestly.
>>2667429Yeah. Reality was depicted. There are clues that the universe at the large scale evolves. It was denser and warmer yesterday. So the philosophy that the universe is static and eternal doesn't make sense now. Glad we agree.
>>2666555I see that Marxists are still pissed off that the steady state model was deboonked. Are you a Trot by chance?
>>2667431>PHILOSOPHY IS A FAKE RELIGIOTARD SUPERSTITION LEARN SOYENCE>Umm academic economics? Yeah that's actually fake spooky bourgeois myth listen to this 19th century German philosopher talking about dialectics instead.You can't have it both ways man. You can't simultaneously attack Wittgeinstinian, lib approach to "'trust the data" as fake bourgeois science and then insist that is philosophy is fake and gay
>>2658664>to replace what was before [UNKNOWN NAME CENSORED TODAY]Steady state model of the universe? That just makes no sense under modern observations
>This is obvious christian propaganda to introduce god.Christianity is beyond dead if you are not an African child or an American boomer with 5 million dollars in housing. That's why liberation theology is a thing. Religion is no longer important enough so it has to be spliced with something else, be it utopian leftism as in liberation theology, ultrareactionary bootlicking of capital and Israel as in protestantism today, vulgar anti-imperialism as in Iranian shiite islam, or nationalism as in hindutva. Religion used to be a real thing that determined every sphere of life from how you dressed to how banking operates. It isn't anymore. No one cares about god and everyone who says otherwise is a larper, they would actually care about god and not about retarded culture war causes otherwise
>>2667467half the time they reject dialectics too
Unique IPs: 21