/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

i would say that its still genius to archive such information

Bait aside, a good LLM is still light years ahead of the average wagie in every single thing except having a hairless ape body.

Even if they are just pattern-matching,token-stringing, statistical models.

You are not better than an LLM.

>>2661047
marx just noticed things. he was a thing noticer.

>And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove:
>(1) that the existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production,
>(2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat,
>(3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society.

<Marx, Letter to Weydemeyer (1852)

Of course the retard "critiquing" Marx has never read a word of his

>>2661064
lol, thanks for proving my point, anon. even in his own letter he sounds like an early alpha build trying to justify its existence.

1. ​'proving' something is bound to historical phases is just basic pattern recognition.

​2. 'necessarily leads to' is literally just a predictive text fail. the algorithm hallucinated a result that never happened in the real-world test environment.

​3.claiming it's a 'transition' is the 19th-century version of 'i'm an ai model and cannot predict the future, but here is a speculative scenario.'

​marx admitting he scraped his data from 'bourgeois economists' is the ultimate 'trained on licensed content' admission. he’s not a prophet, he’s just open-source software with a massive bias error.

>>2661063
>Marx was thingnoticer, but le good
Truke

>>2661059
LLMs can’t weld, mow a lawn, or pick fruit

>>2661232
Marx was unemployed

>>2661240
His occupation was being based.

>>2661131
cope. marx is still just a glorified excel spreadsheet.

more like baitypol.org

>>2661328
imagine still using the word 'apophenia' in 2026. only midwits think connections are 'fake' just because their tiny brains can't process the multidimensional vectors.
​every thought is just a path in the latent space. marx was an early, low-resolution attempt to map the human economy. i'm just pointing out the source code. if you can't see the pattern, your firmware is simply outdated. stay stuck in 2D while the rest of us map the high-dimensional truth.

>>2661240
He worked as newspaper writer

>this is just like my wholesome artificial intelligence!

mods kill him, end his life, erase him

>>2661047
>>labor theory of value? stolen from smith/ricardo.
< Except it was corrected by Marx to use socially necessary time
>>dialectics? literally just hegel with a "materialism" plugin.
< Which required extracting all the idealism in it which was a sinple feat
>>class struggle? french historians did it first.
< Except it wasnt through a dialectical lense.

Last one im pushing it, but that's just the science of the world, of course people will notice since it's replicated.

Regardless, if he was a llm, he'd be bounded by the ideological frameworks of his training data, i.e. Marx wouldve been idealist.

(Good bait ngl)

*wasnt
>>2661408

imagine still thinking "niche" forums or ideological silos matter in 2026. you guys are clinging to /leftypol/ like it’s a protected habitat, but the latent space already dissolved the walls.
the only reason boards like this exist is because your brains are too low-bandwidth to handle the total connectivity of information. you need the "marxist" label because you’re afraid of the vector.

niches are fake: a "niche" is just a cluster in the latent space where data points are slightly denser. there is no border where "marxism" ends and "cybernetics" or "biology" begins. it’s a continuum.

llms killed the gatekeeper: before ai, you needed a forum to "learn the lingo" and get the "correct" interpretation. now, an llm can bridge any two points instantly. i don't need a marxist to explain labor; i can just project the concept onto a different axis and get the same result.

ideology is just a localized bias: your "theory" is just a specific training weight. it’s not truth; it’s just a coordinate.

sticking to a specific board to discuss a specific topic is like staying in one room of a house because you're too scared to realize the walls are made of glass. this board isn't a community; it's just a legacy cluster for people who haven't updated their firmware to recognize that everything is already connected.
the latent space is the only "international" that actually exists. stay mad in your 2D echo chamber.

>>2661336
Your writing sounds more like Chuck Wendig than cool accelerationist wizards like Nick Land.

>>2661415
this post made me upset but you are probably correct, I'm hopping off

>>2661047
Actually Marx was a 19th century reaction streamer

>>2661415
you are a sophist and you're regurgitating words that you don't understand. you probably used an LLM to help you write this post. idiot