https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17G2azaxcj/https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/empresas/eu-destina-23-4-millones-dolares-fortalecer-cumplimiento-ley-laboral-mexico-t-mec-20260112-794941.htmlSo, in a dazzling display of altruism and concern for the global working class, the United States Department of Labor has generously decided to throw $23.4 million at … Mexico. Yes, Mexico. This money is to “strengthen labor law enforcement” so that Mexican businesses play nice with their workers under the USMCA (T-MEC).
The goal of the grand plan is to empower workers to file complaints and use the treaty’s Rapid Response Labor Mechanism when dodgy practices pop up.
Most of the money will be handed to a couple of U.S. groups — Partners of the Americas and Creative Associates International — who’ll go do the heavy lifting, apparently. According to the U.S. government, this isn’t just about Mexican workers, it’s also about giving hardworking Americans a fighting chance in the global marketplace. Isn’t that noble?
American porkies buying off the more radical elements in a foreign trade union.
>>2667961The trade unions in Mexico are corrupt. Trump wants higher wages for Mexican workers.
>>2667968>Trump wants higher wages for Mexican workers.Why would Trump suddenly work against his collective class interests? Especially when his regime is full of his billionaire buddies who are losing money because of this? Stability of their investments would be a rational reason for this kind of move.
>>2667972Trvmp is the vangvard obviously
Btw i don't actually believe Trump is the vanguard, this thread is just to make fun of the AES concept.
>>2667963>rural massesOxymoron.
>>2667959Read Blue Collar Empire.
All leftcoms will be hanged after the Revolution
>>2667959The US is at the stage of "developed
socialism financial capitalism" in economic development.
US becoming China with Trumpian characteristics
>TRUMPISM IS HECKIN MAOISMO
no it's a movement of petty bourgeoisie, labor aristocrats, reactionaries, evangelicals, zionists, cops, troops, tech CEOs, white supremacists, and "farmers" (land owning businessmen in agriculture) all centered around a geriatric real estate billionaire and serial rapist from NYC. There are a few rural workers and scattered rust belt boomers who lost their jobs 20-40 years ago who get overblown and treated as the "heart" of the "movement" in every boot licking op ed that seeks to "explain" (engage in apologetics on behalf of) Trumpism.
The Phantom of Mar A Lago is a bizarre living parody of the American Bourgeoisie, not some kind of crypto-communist.
>>2668072Is Trump the modern Louis Bonaparte III? When does The NYC commune begin?
>>2667963ICE raids are the cultural revolution.
>>2668107>anti-immigration policies, to protect themselves from brain drainDon't you mean anti-emigration?
>>2667959So is this the US's strategy for reindustrialization? Instead of revoking American worker protections to be more competitive make everyone else raise theirs in order to level the playing field LMAO. Its so funny how the Marx is literally being proven right in real time, with the USD collapsing and no real economy to undergerd the American economy the US must reindustrialize to compete. But the only way it can do that is by revoking worker's rights to make it more profitable, the problem with that is that would return us to the late 19th/20th century were communist parties began getting power due to a lack of social democratic reforms stifiling those political movements. Truly the US is damned if you do damned if you don't.
>>2668017>Reas mu lib drivelSorry, Trump and the US are AES on the same basis that Iran, Venezuela and so on are.
>>2668027You will deepthroat my ultra left cock after the revolution you fucking falsifier
>>2668107But this thred isn't about muh ICE you fucking radlib faggot
>>2668072Trump has done more for the Mexican working class by enforcing the right to associate and free syndicalism than any Maoist shithole.
>>2668151Marxist-Leninists, Anti-imperialists and third-worldists have been proved wrong once again.
bump, muh anti-imperialists been really quiet since this dropped
>>2668709reported for breaking R11 and R14
>>2668712Your mother is a capitalist, my penis is the revolution
Anti imperialism is a sham and a humbug.
>>2668761Your mom is gonna squirt on my communist cawk
>>2667959AES isn't about supporting random reactionary workers, it's about a strong party and a strong state. If Trump actually wanted to help, he'd be granting concessions to the Mexican military and police to help them suppress the CIA-sponsored strikes and protests.
when people who can only think in hyperbole and see the proletariat being a minority in the US and all other developed nations and then say the proletariat "does not exist" there does that mean they abolished class????????
>>2668886today i learned CEOs and cops are proletarian
drop the democratic bullshit, buddy, im a communist idrc about the majority in the first place
>>2668889What percentage of the population do CEOs and cops constitute in the US? It doesn't really matter to me whether the proles in the US are a majority or a plurality or a minority, but factually speaking it doesn't seem like they are a minority
BURGERBOO MULTIPOLAROID
VS
RUSSIABOO MULTIPOLAROID
VS
EUROBOO MULTIPOLAROID
WHO WILL WIN
>>2668889How are cops and ceo's not proletarian?
>>2668906ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
>>2668892what percentage of the population do people whose weal and woe whose life and death whose sole existence do NOT depend solely on the demand of their labor and are most affected by the ever change state of biz and on the vagaries of unbridled competition? prole and bourgeois arent the only classes in capitalist society although you could argue whatever is in the middle of the proletarian and the haute bourgeois are also bourgeois (their behavior at least is almost the exact same for sure)
i cant find the banger from i think marx or engels or maybe even lenin………. but it was about how to the proletariat all the bourgeois are the same, small or big
>>2668920What does the text say? That ceo's and cops represent bourgeoisie? Sure. But in statistical sense they are proletarians no? Without class party dont proletarians also represent the bourgeoisie?
>>2668926>in statistical sensewhat the fuck does this even mean. marxism is not sociology
ceos and cops literally have a stake in maintaining capitalism and the same can be said about anyone between the proletariat and the top hat capitalists, although the latter is more controversial here because of the democratic brainworms americans often have
>>2668928I agree there is a section of wage workers who want to maintain their priveleges or something. Still proletarians tho. If i am to go with the way you are using the words proletarian and bourgeoisie, then i am correct in calling non proletarians who represent proletarian interests as proletarians.
>>2668938*would be correct
Communist party made up of non proletarians is proletarian party okay chud, kys also
>>2668873>Mexican workers are reactionaryWhere is teh proof?
>what percentage of the population do people whose weal and woe whose life and death whose sole existence do NOT depend solely on the demand of their labor and are most affected by the ever change state of biz and on the vagaries of unbridled competition? prole and bourgeois arent the only classes in capitalist society although you could argue whatever is in the middle of the proletarian and the haute bourgeois are also bourgeois (their behavior at least is almost the exact same for sure)
To estimate this I looked over some stats, using homeownership without a mortgage as a benchmark for middle classers and porkies, though unless they are leveragemaxxed boomers I'm not sure exactly where they land on the prole-bourg spectrum. According to the census bureau, 65.1% of americans own the homes they occupy, but only 40% those aren't mortgagecucks. That comes out to 26.04% of total population. So by a rough estimate I think it's at minimum a plurality of the population, almost certainly a majority of the adult working-age population. This makes me curious about what a more complete estimate would look like.
>>2668938if they actually have "privileges" that would vanish when class society is abolished then they arent part of a group thats
definitionally immiserated and their defense of capitalism is just acting in rational self-interest, not som
>then i am correct in calling non proletarians who represent proletarian interests as proletarians.no, a middle classer who has bothered to study class struggle scientifically and supports the proletariat would be a communist, but their class position wouldnt change. this isnt to say communists stand outside the proletariat btw, but you should subject proletarians and non-proletarians to different standards when using that category
>>2667959It's AES for the rich
>>2669052Los mexicanos estan obsesionados con ser edgelords reaccionarios. Es un meme entre los gringos que el nazi promedio no es un blanco si no que un mexicano moreno pobre, y ese meme es por algo. La gente mas reaccionaria que he visto son argentinos y mexicanos, no gringos o israelis.
>>2669109You haven’t met the average Israeli, trust me they’d put the average PANista or Milleista to shame
>>2669109ser "reaccionario" tiene que ver con la clase no con la nacionalidad
>argentinos y mexicanosno es coincidencia que mencionaste los paises con mayor clase media en latinoamerica. clase, clase, clase
>>2669092>mexican proles are rich>>2669109>todo el proletariado mexicano es reaccionario porque un par de autistas suben memes a internetmetete un tenedor en los ojos por estúpido
Unique IPs: 27