/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2669982
If it's any conciliation I was the one arguing w you about le bourgeois culture and I find Haiti awe inspiring. It's no exaggeration an ever lasting vindication of materialism over ontology. The Haitian revolution demolished centuries of race mythology through its righteous violence. I have convinced numerous people to abandon their prejudices through it alone.

I'm a vehement internationalist, but inside me there is a Haitian nationalist.

Surely all this this outweighs a /pol/ chinlet rage baiting you.

You're still a liberal doe

>>2669994
>Inside me there is a Haitian
Take that BBC sister!

>>2670005
gutterbrain

>>2670005
Burger greased fingers typed this post

>>2670050
>>2670015
Hello /pol/

>>2670019
literally the reaction 99% of leftypol posts deserve at this point

So what does "frenchified" mean and why is it important?

>>2670210
Not sure. On an unrelated note did you know re-litigating old and settled arguments is a common Fed tactic?

>>2669994
>materialism over ontology
materialism is an ontology.

>>2670486
*epistemology

>>2668590
One of your better posts maoanon, good stuff

>>2670489
epistemology is the theory of knowledge, or of how we come to know (e.g. empiricism, rationalism). ontology is the theory of being, or of what things are (e.g. materialism, idealism).

>>2670496
Base-Superstructure is an epistemological formation

>>2668590
There is a movement in Dominica to reunite with Haiti afaik

inculturedco is one org of theirs

>>2671271
Of course 'Dominica' is a separate micro island sigh

I meant Dominican Republic

>>2670481
Good to know.

>>2668326
The french revolution also abolished slavery, you can't really call them hypocritical for that, Napoleon was the one who brought it back, and it was Charles X who made the whole dept situation.
And yes, the French Revolution was based, it changed everything and was one of humanity's greatest successes.

>>2668333
and what did Marx actually say about bourgeois revolutions like the Paris commune etc?

>>2671271
I think calling it a "movement" is being generous, at least as far as Dominican desire to reunify as Haiti. Most coversations in Dominican politics on this subject are around whether they should annex Haiti as part of the Dominican Republic (and in more openly fascist circles, purge the Black population to settle westward).

>>2671526
We can call them hypocrites for that, because that initial abolition had to be forced out of their pasty asses. The French couldn't fight off the Black and Maroon rebels and the British and Spanish. Slavery was abolished to entice the rebels to unite with the French military and fight off the Spanish and British. This worked, but the writing was immediately on the wall that slavery would likely be re-established as soon as the French felt that they could get away with it. Don't forget that these colonies and the laborers in them produced the vast majority of French exports and wealth. Regardless of Napoleon's personal leadership, France was 100% going to try to re-establish slavery in their colonies. This is why Leclerc's expedition was met with immediate and intense hostility upon arrival, despite Toussaint, Dessalines, Christophe, etc. still being pledged as officers in the French military. They weren't stupid and knew why they were there, and only briefly ceased fire when Leclerc lied and denied that he was re-establishing slavery.

>>2671536
The abolition of slavery wasn't forced tho, it was a very clearly established part of Robespierre's politial program, sure, it benefited France on the short term, but Robespierre had called for its abolishment for years, even before the Revolution, and obviously the ideals of the Revolution were very compatible with the abolition of slavery. And while the sugar trade was certanly lucrative, the colonial empire wasn't that important to the French economy after the 7 years war. Beyond that, the elites that profitted from the slave trade were generally opposed to Robespierre, and were strong supporters of Napoleon, Empress Josephine came from one of those families after all.

>>2671536
>purge the Black population
Dominicans are like one shade lighter if that lmao

Viewing the Haitian Revolution as organic is as naive as viewing the American Revolution as organic. I just think it’s weird that no one ever points out that it was Sonthonax and his 7000 troops who liberated the slaves in Haiti and who armed them. Slave revolts outside of freeing one or two plantations have never been a viable path to revolution. Every slave revolt has never attempted to change the system but ultimately to flee from the state as best they could. The view of the conflict as being carried out by blacks alone was something propagated by American slave owners to justify a tighter grip on slavery. Both White and Black nationalists benefit from this narrative. In reality it was the revolutionary French administration and French soldiers who were responsible.

>>2671614
I am Pakistani, what "cope" would I have, I'm just using pointing out that the usual western leftists being naive idealists

>>2671621
Sonthonax exploited an already present radical social force when he saw the writing on the wall. No different than other concessions offered to Haitians by France in order to prolong its rule.

Men make history as they engage with their definite material circumstances, not muh enlightened ideology

You're a retarded idealist

>>2671629
I’m well aware of the larger material factors at play, but a handful of men in the right place at the right time can change the world. There was no writing on the wall in Haiti, slave revolts don’t defeat armies or even local police/

>>2671629
Still, I think it's correct to view the Haiti revolution as an extension of the French Revolution.

>anti-liberal racial revolution
Haiti was fascist? Wow based based based

>>2671632
>slave revolts don’t defeat armies or even local police
When organized and politically unified they absolutely can. Enslaved Africans comprised the majority of the population, that they couldn't possibly defeat the French is just racist cope.

>>2671637
>I think it's correct to view the Haiti revolution as an extension of the French Revolution.
This is racist cope too.

>>2672005
How is it a racist cope ? it's straight up true, the Haitian revolutionnaries were inspired by the French Revolution and sought to recreated in Haiti, ironically in both cases they ended up the same way, with the proclamation of an Empire.

>>2672040
Except Dessalines was cool and Napoleon sucked

>>2672040
>the Haitian revolutionnaries were inspired by the French Revolution and sought to recreated in Haiti
Some of its leaders saw promise in it, but the point of the revolution was not to "recreate" it. Hell, the 1791 revolt took the side of the French monarchy! This framing stems from an overall racist mentality that the Haitians could not have had their own ideals and vision for society independent of the French. I have very little patience for it and authors with more principles than any of you (C. L. R. James, Étienne Charlier, etc.) have written whole books on it. There is no reason for anyone on the so-called "left" to be digging their heels in on this point except chauvinism and racism.

What about the Haitian revolution (1986)?

>>2672050
Also this. I will always fly the Black and red of Dessalines. Genuinely sucks that it was later associated with the Duvaliers.

Haitian Revolution was counter-revolutionary.

>>2672116
You mean the Dechoukaj. The writings of Haitians aligned with the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement on this have long been translated into English.

>>2672005
I’m looking at this conflict as detached as possible. Unorganized and untrained ex-slaves are not a fighting force. A population can be transformed into one, but that requires investment and centralized leadership. If a slave revolt is ever successful, the ex-slaves goal was always to flee, because they knew they would be killed if an actual army approached them. If you believe I’m racist against Haitians, then I’m racist against the European slaves of Rome. Again I ask you to read the military history of these conflicts, they are absolutely necessary

>>2672142
About four pages in there’s a really interesting paragraph detailing how when Haitian peasants were displaced by US aid and agricultural imports but this didn’t erupt right away because migration was used as a social pressure valve, somewhat similar to how the US used migration westward as a social valve for the fully capitalist eastern seaboard.

>>2670077
you're the one bringing up their racist gutterbrained obsessions

>>2671609
Mike Duncan talks at length about Sonthonax, but every time I bring up Mike Duncan on here I get yelled at because he's a liberal, as if that immediately invalidates everything he has to say.

>>2672142
Do these groups still exist and have they published anything since the 2021 crisis?

>>2672176
Zanji slave revolt established a state near the heartland of the largest empire on earth that held for 15 years

They were sophisticated and organized, just like Haiti's, and it was to the grave detriment of their enemies to have underestimated them.

You're moving the goalpost and talking in generalizations since you aren't really educated on Haiti and it shows.

>>2672210
It's impossible to really know. RIM is gone and the Haitian communist movement has been principally underground since before Duvalier. New Communist Party of Haiti (Marxist-Leninist) had a website that's technically still up, but they seem to have lost control of it and a lot of their articles have been replaced by scam gambling bullshit.

My bet is that these groups or successors to them do still exist in Haiti outside of Port-au-Prince. Historically communists have conducted their best work outside the capital. Port-au-Prince's extractive relationship with the rest of the country has historically colored what politics dominate there, and today the vestiges of the old neo-colonial state and the "gangs" (paramilitaries) dominate that niche.

>>2672287
That makes sense, everything I’ve heard about the civil war since the death of Moise (still incomprehensible to me) is basically limited to Port Au Prince and the rest of the country is more or less functioning as usual

>>2672111
It's true that Haiti had a revolutionnary movement that started before the French Revolution, so yes, in that view, saying that it's merely an extension is generally ignorant of historical reality.
But it's also obvious that the form the revolution took was inspired by the French one. For exemple the revolutionnaries argued in favor of equality between all men based on the Declaration of the right of Men and Citizen, that the national assembly has expicitly rejected for Black Haitians.
So, when they rebelled in 1791, the Haitians were not asking for independance, but an end to slavery. They supported Louis XVI, who they viewed a moderating force against the relatively harsher local governor. This believed this because Louis XVI has signed on and accepted many of the revolutionnary demands, including the creation of a constitutional monarchy, he was viewed at the time as a progressive monarch. (He was secrely conspiring to bring back absolutism, but Haitians didn't know this) This meant that they were backing the revolution, not the reaction. While when Louis XVI got his head chopped up, the white owners sided with the British against the Republic. Louverture did help the Spanish at the time tho, as he yet didn't trust the French.
But once the revolution in France radicalised further, with Robespierre and the Jacobins in charge, they abolished slavery and Louveture realigned himself with France and refused to proclaim the independance of Haiti, instead seeing himself as a french citizen. It's only in 1801, so at the start of Napoleon's consulate, that he declared independance.
Even then, he justified himself using the univerallist principles of the French revolution, and he obviously turned against it when it was going back against those ideals.
I don't get why you're quoting CLR James at me, his most famous book is called "The Black Jacobins" And if anything he criticises the race war representation of the conflict, and puts the revolution back in the context of the Atlantic and French revolutions. If anything, he argues that the Haitians better represented those ideals then the French did. Not that these ideals came from Haiti.

>>2672222
How am I moving the goalposts by pointing out the objective fact that if an organic slave revolt ever succeeds, the slaves first priority is to flee? That makes perfect sense from their perspective, you and I would do the exact same thing. The Zanj was a radically different conflict that arose during a period of extreme internal strife in the Abbasid caliphate. The revolt, like Hati was not started by the slaves themselves but by an outsider, in the Zanj's case, a popular religious preacher who took advantage of the anarchy. He and his followers attacked individual slave estates, freed the slaves, and presented themselves as religious liberators, gradually freeing most of the slaves from the marshes and forming an Army. The Zanj revolt was one of many crises the Abbasids were dealing with, including the loss of Egypt to the Tulunids and Kharijite and Shia uprisings. The caliphate was fighting on every front. Only when al-Muwaffaq stabilized the army and re-centralized authority in the 880s did the Abbasids finally crush the rebellion.

>>2672392
And you’re right, I haven’t read much about Haiti. My only frame of reference is this military history book, and I would argue that it’s more relevant than 99% of post-colonial literature.