>>2668562Foucault only quit whatever communist party he was in because his peers were homophobic and Deleuze only had good things to say about Marx until his accidental death, but at the end of the day they were still only philosophers.
>splitting hairs and creating parallel structures of analysis seems like it is used mainly to create rifts within left politics to take attention from dialectical materialismFirst off, "dialectical materialism" is not a thing. The dialectic is literally just science. Also, the reason is far baser than that, it's just academics trying to carve their own niche so they can maintain their career publishing texts and selling bullshit books.
I find myself agreeing more and more with what Marx had to say about philosophy (in few words: "philosophy is religion rendered into thought and hence to be condemned") whenever I encounter philosophycels online.