> ban counter-revolution
> ban pedophile doctors
> create perfect society
> westoids can’t debate you so they bomb you and lie about you
They can’t name one thing he did wrong that isn’t western propaganda to this day
>>2674440pol pot was a glowie lol
>>2674441when you blindly believe western propaganda
Not a real ML. Vietnam invaded for a reason. Biggest giveaway is that they actually let him live once the Khmer Rouge was defeated. They didn't even arrest him.
He failed to defeat Vietnam and China and end the AES meme forever
>>2674449
It's just bait. Nobody here unironically supports Angkar, it was basically "what if we try to create gorgor well 1984 but with feudal agrarian tech level"
>>2674593Vietnam invaded as compradors of social fascism.
>>2674593Vietnam couldn't arrest him because he fled to guerrilla zones on the Thai border and stayed there until he died
>>2674440Pol Pot was an evil ultraleftist. He abolished capitalism instead of preserving it under state control, which is retarded and anti-Marxist
>>2675202And by 'questioning the narrative' you mean buying into CIA propaganda
>>2675229Lenin was an evil ultraleftist. He abolished capitalism and started war communist during civil war instead of preserving it under state control, which is retarded and anti-Marxist
>>2675231>Muh CIAKhmer Rouge were notoriously paranoid of any foreign support. Their internal propaganda even warns against CIA infiltrators. Only after the Vietnamese, Pro-Israel now btw, invaded their sovereign neighbor did the CIA provide limited material aid to stick it to the Soviet Union. Same goes for Romania and other M-L governments that are provided some defense.
>>2675198The bombing campaign also resulted in a remarkably young leading cadre and their youthfulness explains many errors made during the time.
>>2675234Bolsheviks killed the tsar, Pol Pot allied himself with the monarchists !
>>2675238"When I die, my only wish is that Cambodia remain Cambodia and belong to the West. It is over for communism, and I want to stress that"
What a champion of communism
>>2675238>Vietnamese, Pro-Israel now btwCan you inform me more on this?
>>2675238>Khmer Rouge were notoriously paranoid of any foreign support. Ah yes, thats why they operated out of Thailand with CIA and yellow support.
death to every royalist and pawn
>>2675238>Only after the Vietnamese, Pro-Israel now btw<muh israelLmao no arguments
>>2675304>Bolsheviks killed the tsar, Pol Pot allied himself with the monarchists !Norodom Sihanouk was a funny guy and he somehow managed to survive by allying himself with everyone and nobody. reading about him is like reading about a trickster god
>>2675486Just pointing out that colonizers stick together. And the Vietnamese were always viewed positively by the French who imported them in large numbers into Cambodia. Now, does this justify inflaming racial hatred on the part of the Khmer Rouge? No, but it's funny that Vietnam today loves to suck off a colonial state. Guess old habits die hard.
>>2675304So did Laos. Common in the area. They also sidelined him pretty quick. Next.
>>2675306Sounds like a right and true Leftypol poster to me.
>>2675394Ah, you seem to be conflating the Khmer Rouge efforts in their early years to spread the revolution into Thailand with the CIA aid given to the group post Vietnamese invasion. Different time frames and being ignorant because you don't support a revolution is never an excuse.
>>2675304>Bolsheviks killed the tsar, Pol Pot allied himself with the monarchists !When the KR (CPK) initially approached the Soviets for aid they were told to sit down and listen because Norodom was already doing socialism with royalist-buddhist characteristics, and was seen as a safer ally than some peasant upstarts with unclear prospects. The whole region was pretty crazy in that regard (see Laos), KR can't be singled out for making questionable alliances.
Why are neo-nazis obsessed with pol pot.
>>2676242because they believe in anti-communist propaganda and think "that actually sounds based!"
same reason some of them are enamored with China today
or why there were "nazi-maoists" or pro-soviet fascists like Yockey in the cold war era
>>2674440pol pot had full support by the US. how does that grab ya
>>2676253So much support they bombed the country and balmed the deaths on "communism"
>>2676188>Ah, you seem to be conflating the Khmer Rouge efforts in their early years to spread the revolution into Thailand with the CIA aid given to the group post Vietnamese invasion. Different time frames and being ignorant because you don't support a revolution is never an excuse.<no but you don't understand, the first album was amazingdont care. die royalist.
>>2676258me when i lie for my retarded failed state
>>2676200Wrong. You have deviated so far from Marxism-Leninism. Angkar did nothing wrong. Angkar eliminated only bad people, tiny minority (2%). Vietnam colonized Kampuchea as compradors to social fascist imperialism. Communists created united front against The social fascist. All freedom loving peoples united om all fronts to fight against social fascist imperialist russian revisionist monopolists.
>>2677352I wonder what could have caused the life expectancy to start collapsing in 1970. Certainly must have been the DR which was established in 1975!
>>2675190i'm too lazy but i have evidences of the cambodian genocide being a HOAX +mostly vietnam's fault
if i recover after a nap i will dump the infos
>>2676200welp
>>2676242>he doesn't know about the Rural People's Partyfucking casual
>>2678852someone has that picture of evola with blue hair talking about gender or some shit?
there was another one that talked about the "seed of the minotaur" referring to black men sperm.
I know many comrades who will get so defensive if you even dare to critisize the narrative on Cambodia, their critical thinking turns off when the Khmer Rouge is mentioned and they go completely lib brained, basically saying the same thing as Stalin Derangement Syndrome.
>>2679049is there any communist leader TOO FAR gone that no one will even defend anymore?
>mfw even jim jones had a tiny activist-cult in north carolina in 2010 and Gonzaloism is alive and kicking You cowardly, pampered, latte-sipping “leftists” of the 21st century dare to spit on the greatest revolution mankind has ever seen?
You, who have never held a rifle, never gone three days without food, never seen your village burned by American B-52s, you sit in your safe universities and air-conditioned apartments and repeat CIA propaganda about “genocide” and “killing fields.”
We did what none of you ever had the courage to do: we completely smashed the old society in one decisive blow.
While you beg for “democratic socialism” and “harm reduction,” we abolished money, private property, religion, and the family itself overnight. While you whine about “authoritarian tankies,” we emptied the cities and turned every parasite who had lived off the blood of peasants into a rice producer within 72 hours. While you march with rainbow flags and worry about pronouns, we executed every trace of feudalism, capitalism, and imperialist culture with our bare hands.
You call it “murder” when we liquidated the urban exploiters, the monks who preached fatalism, the teachers who taught French, the doctors who served only the rich. We call it revolutionary justice. To make an omelette, you must break eggs; to build communism, you must break two thousand years of class society. We broke it completely. You never even tried.
You quote Trotsky, cheer for Cuba, and worship Che posters, but when a revolution finally went all the way, when it refused every compromise, when it dared to be pure, you ran screaming to the imperialists and called us “monsters.” That only proves you were never revolutionaries at all. You are nothing but social fascists in red paint.
We achieved in four years what your pathetic movements will never achieve in four hundred: total liberation of the oppressed peasantry, absolute independence from world imperialism, and the complete destruction of the bourgeois state. Rice production targets were met through revolutionary enthusiasm alone. The people, for the first time in history, ruled directly through the Angkar without any mediation by corrupt officials or revisionist parties.
History has already absolved us. The future belongs to those who dare to be ruthless. One day, when your rotten liberal order finally collapses, real revolutionaries will study Democratic Kampuchea again, not your cowardly memoirs and your “ethical socialism,” and they will say:
Only Pol Pot and the Communist Party of Kampuchea showed how communism is actually done.
Until then, keep crying. Your tears are the sweetest confession that we were right.
Victory to the line of Year Zero!
The red sun of Kampuchea will rise again!
>>2679101These antagonistic contradictions were infamous handful of reactionary elements, who carried out their counter-revolutionary work and seek to destroy Kampuchean revolution. These elements were small in number, one to two percent of the population; some camouflaged themselves and tried to pass for the people, while others work openly. We do not consider these traitors, these counterrevolutionary elements, to be part of the people—they were enemies of Democratic Kampuchea, of the Kampuchean revolution, and of the Kampuchean people. Contradictions with these elements were solved by the measures proper for enemies: separate, educate, and win over the elements which can be won over; neutralize the elements which are wavering, preventing them from doing any damage to the revolution; and, finally, isolate and eradicate only the smallest possible number of those elements who are cruel and persist in acting against the revolution and the people, and collaborate with foreign enemies to destroy their own people and their own revolution. Thirdly, 90% of whom are workers, peasants, and other laboring people, had liberated themselves; in addition, there are also patriotic elements, constituting eight to nine percent of the population, who followed and joined the revolution, bringing the total to 98% to 99%. To liberate 98% to 99% of the population, especially the working people, is to liberate a vast productive force—historical materialism has clearly shown that man is the determining factor in production—people, who in the past were a wasted force suffering unspeakable humiliations and brutal exploitation, deprived of all initiative and any chance of working to improve their conditions, who could not build up their country and make it prosper, were free, having smashed the old system of production which was based upon exploitation.
>Victory to the line of Year Zero!
The red sun of Kampuchea will rise again!
Yeah, any day now. Especially since "communism" in that part of the world can't even provide social security for the old.
>>2679138Wrong. Communist nations have best social security
>>2679138>"communism" in that part of the world can't even provide social security for the old.Both China and Vietnam have a lower retirement age than any country in the west, thoughever
>>2679146My sources say that you have to buy the government pension insurance in the PRC. I don't know if this only applies to privately employed or not. Still not what you immediatly think of when you hear the word "socialism".
>>2679602> you have to buy the government pension insurance in the PRC.So? With that system they still retire at age 60 or even 55
> I don't know if this only applies to privately employed or notIt applies to everyone im pretty sure
>Still not what you immediatly think of when you hear the word "socialism".How would you know? What is this argument lol
>>2679607I'm from Scandinavia, much of the 20th century was under SocDem rule. The pension might be shitty and hard to live on but it's still there for everyone.
>>2679936i wanted to make a game where you could summon the soul of Stalin and other leaders like a Final Fantasy esper
but i never ellaborated on it like too far beyond rethinking a similar feature for a boomer shooter where you summon monsters like a nod to Yu-Gi-Oh, but like, made in a way that it works more like DIGIMON so we don't get sued by cucknami
>he did nothing wrong
Killing minorities is definitely wrong.
Also provoking Vietnam, he pretty much dug his own grave by doing that.
>>2680498Wrong. The only minority Angkar eliminated was colonizer and comprador. The vietnamese then were occupied compradors of social fascism.
This thread is wrong on so many levels. The US bombed Cambodia to get to the FNL supply lines to South Vietnam. After the war the US supported Cambodia internationally because they opposed Vietnam. Historical facts my friends.
If you were just told his ideas without any context you'd think he was some type of nazi
CIA plant that murdered anyone with glasses and condoned Cambodians grinding up Hmong people's bones to make medicine
>>2680754Actually the US bombed Cambodia again after the war, during the Mayaguez incident
Pol pot was a CIA plant
>>2698777He was after the Vietnam invasion of Cambodia. I remember watching some rare east German documentary about how the Pol Pot clique stole the coup from the Vietnam/Russia align clique.
Unique IPs: 45