i know this is a extremely niche question, but i will try it anyway. so there was a big debate among a certain brand of marxists over the question of THREE HOLE THEORY VS. TWO HOLE THEORY.
only very few marxists can actually remember this significant moment in heterodox marxism. so in short: there was this ingenious heideggerian marxist and he came up with the conclusion, that TWO HOLE THEORY is actually real.
and now after the dust has settled: was he right?
>>2678120btw his name was حظ الدين,
In truth, it doesn't matter how many holes there are, because they can all merge into a single, supermassive one. Besides that, in an extremely long time the holes will evaporate.
>THREE HOLE THEORY VS. TWO HOLE THEORY.
Im shocked nobody has made a "Your Mom" joke yet
How many volumes of Capital did Posadas read again? Like six? There's probably four holes for the fourth international, its like cosmic trotskyist symbology.
three hole theory is the correct one, because I fucked your mom in the vagina, the ass and the mouth
Shitpost thread up in /leftypol/ during American hours for 5h
This place is great