The contemporary Right, in the form in which it exists today, did not emerge organically but was shaped through several distinct historical reconstructions.
Twentieth-century National Socialism, while not inventing the Right as such, left a deep imprint on later radical and far-right movements, especially in terms of political myth, symbolism, and methods of mass mobilization.
In the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, figures such as Paul Gottfried helped reframe and rebrand parts of the post-conservative Right, coining concepts like “alt-right” and popularizing the narrative of “cultural Marxism.”
These ideas were then further transformed within online subcultures, including transnational internet spaces, where Western far-right discourse intersected with Japanese nationalist, aesthetic, and media influences, before being consolidated in the Western internet ecosystem.
Also, the term "cultural Marxism," as I know, was coined by Paul Gottfried in his book "The Strange Death of Marxism,"in which he wrote that European leftists, it turns out, had become disillusioned with Marx's ideas about revolution and had decided to engage in cultural criticism in order to destroy Western values. Then he proceeds to lump Eurocommunists, Freudo-Marxists, and a whole bunch of other Marxists together, labeling them "cultural Marxism."
P.S. I advise all Nazis to read the "Early Life" section of your stepfather Paul on Wikipedia.
doesnt matter, alt right died at Charlottesville, and its "leader" richard spencer got buck broken so hard he turned into a libtard
the right wing of politics is fundamentally irrational
thats what i find the more i look at it
>>2679906Starting with Schicklgruber, Rightism was only rebranded, but at its core it remained the same
But if you think about it logically, even this is a rebranding of the Torah (Jews -> whites, goyim -> non-whites)
>>2679920>whiteshitler was not concerned with "whites" though, but "aryans" in particular. whiteness is an american concept, which plays its predominant role in slavery.
>>2679927The term "Aryan" is not appropriate for the amerimutts, so the term was rebranded as "white".
Even though they had different origins for different purposes
>>2679958Wasn't the term ayran used for a group of non white people before Nazis appropriated it?
>>2679974the aryans refer to proto-indo european (PIE) peoples, which is the common genetic group that indians, iranians and europeans come from. thats why hitler used the swastika.
>>2679958no, whiteness precedes aryan philology.
>>2679981> no, whiteness precedes aryan philology.I know, I meant White(colonial term)->Aryan(Nazi term)->White(Nazi term)
Bump