>>2687250You mean Comintern's*, kiddo.
>Not yetFirst Congress (because line struggle was led in the new communist parties splitting from social chauvinist socdems)
Second Congress (because the conceptual issue hadn't materialized yet)
>ActiveThird Congress (still vulnerable to from Above slippage)
Fourth Congress (most universal)
Fifth Congress (regressed to only being for for imperialist countries due to Bukharin's adverse rightist influence)
Sixth Congress (for all countries again post the Chinese massacre, Stalin's subsequent anti-Bukharin/rightist purge).
>NotSeventh Congress (Popular front capitulation, bureaucratic strata fills state, counterrevolutionary process within the socialist states have foothold to unwind the reaction that slowly culminates in large setbacks in the 50s, 70s, 90s)
No more Comintern Congresses as proletarian internationalism is renounced to please the bourgeois democratic "allies" of US, UK, etc.
The United Front tactics that led the CPC to victory in the Chinese Revolution were those of UFfB as they disregarded Fifth Congress Stalin-Bukharinite the disastrous bureaucratic centralism dictat of remotely deployed UFfA.
Maybe you can teach me what highly principally illegal, uncompromising and revolutionary struggle the ICP was carrying out in Italy during the Years of Lead by the way? Or did they conveniently seize to exist during that time too, like Bordiga's revolutionary partisan activity during the rise and extent of Italian fascism? Notice that I'm not asking if they did activism, that's a thought-terminating cliche /r/ultraleft drills into you people very well.
Let me guess you don't have any answer to the "International" (Italian) Communist Party's activity during the years of lead?