>>2687681>life isn't a zero sum gameDidn't watch the video, but positive-sum games were already in Morgenstern and Neumann's foundational text: You can just model a zero-sum game and introduce a dummy player that gets looted by the others.
>>2687778>rationalist strain of theorizingYeah OP just has a meme understanding of philosophy so he doesn't know that empiricist and rationalist refers to two camps in philosophy, with the rationalists often being religious. He probably means something like "smug liberal racist atheist on reddit".
>idealizations that may be so reductive that it doesn't actually capture the complexityYou can say that about the
intro texts for just about anything. Game theorists also deal with people having cognitive limits, but that comes later.