Is revolution possible in the SECOND WORLD? Occupied by the first world in Europe and allied with the third world in central asia.
HMMMM???
Ever thought about that?
Possibly central Asia. BRI is building a lot of infrastructure there and they're seeing rapid development that might be held back by existing political forms.
I have not thought about that. I need more time to think.
>>2687690They have the most soviet nostalgic populations there
Post-WP EE (without Belarus and Russia) is the most reactionary, most open, most brazen dictatorship of capital. Several states have functional apertheids (Slovenia, Latvia), several have been ruled for three decades by neoliberal parties (Montenegro, Croatia, Serbia), some are fascistic (Ukraine). Czechoslovakia is empty of life. Bosnia and Kosovo are American protectorates. Most of them have been depopulated due to migration towards Western Europe (Bulgaria or the Baltics). Out of all the places, Serbia is the only one there could be a socialist revolution. Elsewhere it's bleak.
>>2687693All of this applies to Russia and Belarus.
>>2687697If that were true the entire political caste in Russia would have been scraped off of the government and fed to a wood chipper for the "Unlimited Partnership"
>>2687693>Most of them have been depopulated due to migration towards Western Europe (Bulgaria or the Baltics)TRUE
and they are only left with a majority elderly population of pensioners lmao
>>2687693>>2687697Baltics, Ukraine, Poland have and even Czechia is moving to ban the communist party.
>>2687701Yeah eastern Europe at least will gleefully eat shit from the capitalist class for the next 5 generations because muh soviets bad
>>2687701in poland the communist party was a social club for boomers and students, banning it probably didn't really matter beyond the president using it for publicity with chuds. they were banned for something stupid like praising stalin in an article or something. socialist parties here seem to just proclaim their support of democracy or something to the government and stay legal. none of them are relevant btw, there's some socdems sympathetic to socialism though
>>2687754China really sucks at foreign policy, its only good with trade, extremely bad and negligent PR, defenders of China are literally praising isolation.
>>2687701And how is that different from having a controlled opposition communist party like in Belarus and Russia?
>>2687693This is kind of why I think socialist revolution is most likely in Ukraine. People don't want to fucking die in Nazi war anymore.
>>2687706>he thinks migrants want to move to those shitholeslol