the idpol thread to end all idpol threads
>umm despite being only X% of the population, demographic Y makes up >X% of the ruling classerino!!1!!
whether you're talking about men, jews, whites, cishets, whatever, THERE SHOULD BE NO RULING CLASS YOU STUPID FUCKWIT.
there's a word for trying to rearrange the ruling class to better "represent" the demographics of the rest of the population and that word is LIBERALISM.
>>2743483>the idpol thread to end all idpol threadsThat's just like a war to end all wars. Not gonna happen
its been a year since I last had sex, this isn't due to class conditions, there is no material reason why women can't put out, there isn't a big bad capitalist man preventing me from having sex, women are the only thing preventing me from having sex.
my penis hurts, my balls hurt, this has nothing to do with capitalism, this is a whole different level of evil and tyranny, and it's all due to women.
"anti-idpol" is just "anti-sjw but chuds suck too". give it up
uyghas will be like "yeah I'm anti idpol" and then wave national flags and glaze religion
>>2743483Sh'yeah, well, while you're complaining about people moaning about their feelings, I'm imagining myself as a Hellenistic warrior-king.
Class is not about wealth
>>2743598
Litrerally every third worlder already knows this, thats why nobody is going to fall for the it was muh jews
>>2743681>Class is not about wealthbut wealth is about class.
Wealth is not foundational to class. But class is foundational to wealth. Relation to means of production is foundational to class, which manifests as vast wealth disparity between those who own means of production and those who are forced to sell their labor power as a commodity because they have no means of production.
>>2743517maybe its because you're on this site, anon
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that anti-idpol correlates with a certain demographic. I spit in the face of cis het white male proletarians despite being a communist, because I know their rudimentary capacity for empathy makes them disengage from superstructural struggles everyone else suffers from for which they can not muster up a human response. Wealth is all that matters to them because envy towards a rich white man is their only motivator for joining the left.
>>2743598
And this is why I heckin’ love Nazis, because then you know your enemy straight away, instead of playing Peek A Boo with bigots cloaked in Marxist intellectualism
>>2743872Muh distriboooshan
>>2743517>there is no material reason why women can't put outthe idea of someone unironically being so flummoxed as to why they haven't gotten any pussy that it actually makes them believe magical forces are to blame
>>2743854This is /leftypol/, don't post bait
>>2743783True, but some proletarians earn more/live better than some petty bourgeois (due to economy of scale, or different fields). The class stratification in the pyramid shouldn't be so orthogonal
If a white people are killed there will no longer be an idpol problem seems like a pragmatic solution to me
>>2744065Other races are racist between them too
>>2744085Yeah but there will no longer be the question of "social justice or class" any more since the gap won't be as big, opening a way forward
>>2744091>he thinks the totally 99% white layinos won't immediately feel the gapYou have never interacted with people from north africa I assume? They unironically do the "whiter than you mohamed" meme
>>2743766>what if the ruling class was more representative of societythere would still be a ruling class
>>2744170
did you try asking one nicely after taking a bath and brushing your teeth
>>2744316That wouldn’t happen if whites were wiped off the face of the Earth.
>>2744085Xenophobia =/= Racism
>>2744208
>triggered caucasoid demon showing his true colors
Like a clockwork.
>>2744347
>being a communist is letting 500 years of atrocities fly
Tell me, which demographic most predominantly voted for Trump. It’s the whites and those who believe they are white. There is something intrinsically evil about whiteness.
>>2743483You're gonna get banned by the jannies.
>>2744353
You will never be a communist.
>>2744353
Marxist theory does not actually involve materialism. It’s a sociological framework centering the social construct of class to make sene of human behavior. It’s psychological and sociological and doesn’t actually necessitate nor ever make use of physical laws to reason or prove its claims. The materialist bit is needless for Marxism but is a sly way to make a soft science affair look more credible like a hard science. Whiteness as a social construct is bound to interests and common behaviorisms that can be subject to sociological analysis, and it wouldn’t be any leas materialist than an analysis of the sociological constructs of bourgeoisie and proletarian.
>>2744359
The reasons why whites hate non-whites and non-whites hate whites are very different and it shows how little you understand these issues if you believe the two are equivalent and interchangeable.
>>2744365
>>sociology isn't materialist
Not automatically.
>>2744365
>to justify your xenophobia
What is the reason for why people hold animosity towards whites?
>>2744374
Marxism isn’t either. You can’t just slap the materialist label onto your theory and then be considered materialist. Marx’s theories have as little materialist foundation as psychoanalysis.
>>2744377
>the same reason why people hold animosity towards non-whites, bourgeois propaganda.
Wrong, it’s because white society commits various atrocities both on a large scale (imperialism) and small scale (interpersonal discrimination) and chooses to ignore the subject and come up with reality denying excuses to be at ease for what their society is responsible for. Non-whites do not need bourgeois propaganda to notice that repeatedly in their lifetime.
>>not whiteness, he said whites here
Oh sorry, you’re right. I should have spoken of it as an impersonal abstraction that has nothing to do with you, so that your feefees don’t get triggered. It’s not like the construct of whiteness and system of white supremacy manifests in the socialized white person to enact and be complicit in upholding white supremacy.
>Read Hegel and then read Marx
That’s a non-answer. Marx’s theories have no tangible ties to materialism and is as distant from materialism as psychoanalysis.
And that you are using Lasalle as a stand in for the N-word to attack me invalidates your complaints about criticizing whites and their role in dividing workers.
>>2744393
I’m not even saying this as an insult, but you have some sort of mental handicap.
ok ok but total moid genocide tho
>>2744341Do not ask a north african what he thinks of subsaharian africans
>>2744398As long as it includes
trccns transwomen
>>2744410no because those are foids. and moid genocide is only for moids not for foids.
>>2743483>THERE SHOULD BE NO RULING CLASS YOU STUPID FUCKWIT.There's never been an agricultural society without a ruling class, and the claims of anarchic pre-agricultural societies has been much exaggerated, but that's a separate discussion.
leftists are immune to nuance
>>2744340I mean it worked for whites, why wouldn't it work for us right.
Ain't no Carthaginian or Pict taking revenge on anyone.
>>2743517How typical. Blame the women and not the fact that you're fat, ugly, and autistic.
Le blame le capitalism
>>2744340>this time we'll finish the job instead of initializing an endless series of reprisals and counter-reprisalsok? good luck?
>>2744694>I mean it worked for whites, why wouldn't it work for us right.did it work? you're here proposing something that proves it didn't work.
>>2744770I'm 6ft tall, good looking, big dick, good at eating pussy and fingering but yeah autistic as shit, still women are evil for not fucking me on sight, I have made the 2/3 women I have been with orgasm to the point of squirting, it's not fair that women don't see me for the sex beast that I am.
>>2744016sex doesnt cost money, it's not like housing, so why would the economy or material conditions make me have less sex? it's womens fault 100%
OP you're screaming into a void of mostly radlibs and retards that think "class reductionism" is a legitimate argument.
>>2743525>>2743521>Immediately start strawmanning Yep, libs instantly spotted.
>>2743766 >Source: Pew Research otherwise known as "cite bad statistics and other 'data' to fit my current agenda" This is so retardedly skewed by a handful of trillionaires (not to mention overall incorrect information) as to be absolutely fucking meaningless.
Unique IPs: 30