/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

No interest at all? I admit it's not perfect, but come on.

>>2752817
gotta find a better hook for your thread anon. Maybe condense what you're trying to say better? Your point by point of your thesis is pretty unclear and not many people are gonna bother reading a 70 page document by some rando

>>2752949
I understand not wanting to read the whole thing, but I would hope a skilled reader could follow the structure of the paper (using the table of contents) to read just 2-3 pages that are most pertinent to their interests. I don't know if other people read things the same way I do, so I can't say for sure if that would work.

Even though it's a long paper, it's quite shallow in many of the subjects. I'm just trying to cover a lot of bases in terms of how I weave the central model into anything. And for me, that is necessary because if I come across a puzzle piece that doesn't fit, I have to adjust the model.

I also did not write this with the intention of publishing it or even really having others read it. It's more like a dense, organized collection of notes that I've developed through covering many of the subjects mentioned at different layers of depth.

>>2751190
The group controls the pen is a pretty interesting point

>>2755286
well, here's what i think from reading around 12 pages
i find it pretty interesting, especially when it comes to childhood and adulthood development and with frameworks
so far it seems very focused on one particular style/place/state of people but i haven't read the rest of it(i have it bookmarked to read for later)
the theory put forward intrigues me but the classification into a few separate domains like social, law, and finance seems a bit too narrow, there could be a lot more
the writing could see some improvement because some of it feels llm-generated (eg: this is not because x. it is because y) so it ruins the immersion sometimes

>>2755299
>seems very focused on one particular style/place/state of people
You'll have to expand on what you mean by this.

>the classification into a few separate domains like social, law, and finance seems a bit too narrow
Yes, I should include a derivation of these categories. They might be the most popular ones, but they seem arbitrary without a grounding.

>the writing could see some improvement because some of it feels llm-generated
It is, but let me explain how. I wrote the axioms, and I wrote the concepts. I then used an LLM to decompose, reorganize, and recompose. I do that as part of my process, which means the LLM is going to touch a lot of the file eventually and fuck up some of the verbiage.

I'm working on it like a codebase. The design, the section architecture, the model is mine. The details and the connections are created.

Also, I've made some updates to the paper, and will continue to do so.

Here's the latest draft: https://files.catbox.moe/u025jw.pdf

another ai slop thread

>>2758579
>The details and the connections are created.
Actually, this was wrong. Most of the details are main. Vague references to popular ideas (less controversial, less original assertions) may not be mine but take a far less important position in the paper.

>>2758593
>main
*mine
ugh