>>1807816>LaRouchite copeI didn't know LaRouche was alive when Lenin wrote his work about Empirocriticism.
>Capitalism and feudalism both have commodity production. Socialism does not How do you know? The difference was that commodity production was generalized in capitalism, there is nothing that suggests that socialism has no commodity production whatsoever, as the USSR showed - "birthmarks of the old society" and all. Marxism is a science of tendencies, that talks about things accumulation and agglomeration.
>Under both Marxist and Leninist definitions, yes.Anglo brainrot would do so much definition-mongering that Cuba is now imperialist. The absolute state. Let's do the checklist again, apparently Swaziland and the Republic of Atos are capitalist and imperialist as well.
>The very fact that they're even allowed to be in the party is a huge fucking LI don't give a shit about your Ls and neither do the Chinese people. Particularist interests are not the same as class interests, as in, a class
for itself, not
as itself.
>And? Who said I was a Maoist? Didn't even try to deny the other points btw.It was retarded to bring up Pinochet when China's limited recognition of Pinochet was motivated by geopolitical interests solely, not economic ones, unlike trade with Israel. The whole argument is moralism anyway.
>>1807805In an agglomerated way, China operates de facto under the CMC' cycle, indicated for example by their increasing value of their variable capital in relation to constant capital.