>>533297it's not so much about picking a side as people who've obviously got a side, or some instincts towards a side, but are too cowardly to show it or to revise their prejudices in light of new information. as i say: it's one thing to say "actually, this is a nuanced situation" and another to run your mouth about how this is actually very simple right up until the moment of invasion, then go very quiet once the tanks actually roll in.
there are people who've bothsides'd it i've not said anything about. Corbyn comes to mind as having made both anti-NATO and anti-Invasion statements, which is a position essentially consistent with everything he's said in the past.
>>533319that's not what dyslexia is
>>533323in fairness, it's a perfectly valid tactic in human communication:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth(keep an eye out for it on imageboards. pronunciation might not be available as a test, but there are plenty of other stylistic differences in text that people will try to make use of.)
>>533326the point isn't whether the holodohoax happened or not, it's that when you're going on about it right now, after having talked about the buildup to the invasion and then suddenly saying nothing about the actual war, it's more obvious than not that you're a coward who wants to say "ukraine bad" without actually saying it.
i don't care about the holodomor either way, supposing it was literally true stalin was still based. my one regret is not remembering to include a disclaimer making that clear. it's not about the holodomor, it's about the obvious sublimation of anti-ukraine posting.