THE BEST SUGGESTION THIS SITE WILL EVER HAVE:
PLEASE MAKE A /NSFW/ BOARD TO SEPARATE THE PORN THREADS FROM SIBERIA, IT'S DISGUSTING!!!! it's disgusting specially for people who visit /siberia/ for other threads such as the royal colony(doesn't matter if it's has softcore porn in it, it is ignorable and it is mainly for aesthetical/memey purposes anyways) and also other threads as well.
I feel like the mods have to bleach their eyes everytime they have to moderate siberia and see a goatsee equivalent every nanosecond there. mods, do yourselves a favor if you value your eyes lol.
thanks for listening to my honest REACTION of visiting siberia
58 posts and 2 image replies omitted.>>31789sex and porn are two different things, sex isn't pornographic, it's the act. being normal about sex would make sense if it were IRL in a nightclub, which is a completely different thing from doing it on an internet forum, which is like sitting in a chair and typing/posting content, completely different. sorry to break the fourth wall/immersion of this site for a moment there.
>puritanismpuritanism is a religious thing and this site isn't religious in the slightest, neither am I.
>>31794pls lets keep it respectful, the anon actually gave a honest opinion here
>>31805the raiders would disobey that though, actually I think the raiders would do it regardless of anything put into practice anyways… but I think this
>>31803 approach would be better since people inside /nsfw/ wouldn't have to worry/learn about spoiling their posts, it would be easier to moderate too(but the raiders would simply post gore or whatever anywhere anyways…)
also vote for the /nsfw/ board everyone!! :
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7 >>31801>it is about the exclusionSince you agreed that not every assxual would be repulsed by porn, then your complaint here doesn't make sense. The presence of something cannot be exclusionary unless it's offending, unlike the absence of something. It would be exclusionary if /siberia/ was a pure porn board, and likewise if it was a SFW board. But it isn't either of these.
This is the basic assumptive rationale for why every /b/ on imageboards allow both categories of porn and non-porn posts btw. I can't believe I have to spell this out loud since it's assumed everyone knows it.
>>31807If a site is distancing people away because they're getting absolutely disgusted isn't exclusionary then idk what is.
like ok sure not all ace people are repulsed by porn, but I am, and literally anyone that isn't somehow desensitized (probably by watching porn frequently + also someone must feel sexual attraction to do that in the first place) would be grossed out by hardcore porn, so it is still exclusionary. it does make sense to also include ace people on my complaint because you literally have to be somehow desensitized from watching hardcore porn in the first place(like why would you do that?).
>>31824OMG SO MUCH WINNING OMG OH SHIT
SO MUCH WINNINGGN!!!!1!
>>31826>you make us look badAcceptability politics always seems to re-emerge in spring.
I wonder why I noticed that? Is seasonal discourse a thing people've written about?
>>31831This is a general purpose imageboard prominently featuring a leftist political discussion forum, and rules that are conductive to that which apply to all boards, creating a novel environment to discuss a wide range of topics. Particularly art,
which one must allow nsfw content to get a full picture of.Your argument holds for live action stuff, since there's not really anything to discuss there–exceptions would need to be made for artistic nudity, as well as a clearly defined way to differ it from porn–but you're being disingenuous trying to pretend there is such thing a hard political / apolitical dichotomy–that there cannot be useful discussions that emerge from the later into the former, and you are being immature by calling it gross or calling any who engage in such gross in doing so.
>>31833I think the hypthetical /nsfw/ board would be about as active as /tech/, given current nsfw activity on /siberia/, while the remaining activity would put it on par with /leftypol/. It'd be fine. Don't most people here use the overboard anyway?
>>31835I mean sure it's novel to see the bump order popcorn around for a while, but on the other end you get stuff like 4chan where a thread can fall into the void in like 5 minutes and no one bothers to effortpost.
Maybe you could have like, a tag based imageboard-booru hybrid, but that would be a whole different experience from using an imageboard proper.
>>31757>>31772>satireit's not satire>>31739/siberia/ is the leftypol version of /b/.
NSFW content has typically been allowed on /b/.
>>31756Grace is an adopted leftypol OC.
+ I contribute to the siteSo I earned my stay.
>>32202i'm inclined to disagree on both fronts, there's no correlation for the former and it's not common enough for the latter to be true. if we really wanted to drive off channers it would be far down the list of things to try.
even then: you don't
want to drive off channers, you want to bring them in (with the wider appeal of the site as a better discussion board than *chans) while stripping the site itself of fealty to "chan culture", leaving behind a growing site independent of western imageboard culture at large.
remember: a website shapes its userbase far more than vice versa.
I disagree with OP's reasons, but I think that an /nsfw/ board should be made. I initially disagreed with an NSFW board, but my opinion has changed with time and 'study'.
I think porn threads like my muscle-girl thread or futa thread or the Alunya and Grace Fanfic thread(s). should be moved to a separate board because, like 4/b/, other topics sink NSFW threads too quickly. This is especially the case because /siberia/ is the target of a lot of spam, meaning that threads don't get the posting speed they should get, so catalog shifts very quickly because between actual good threads there are myriads of typical /b/-stuff; shitty OPs, random topics, schizophrenic shitpost rants etc. that are technically si/b/eria material but also mean threads of NSFW basis that have more effort, nuance or material get sunk as posting isn't rapid-fire there.
Finally, to use OP's logic, if I wanna look at porn or sexual topics, I don't wanna look at political schizo-posts and lame memes that kill boners. I don't wanna look at a dozen schizoshit posts I don't care about when opening catalog to find a specific thread
SO TO CONCLUDE: PLEASE MAKE AN /NSFW/ BOARD DEV-MODS!!!
>>33409based, if you're in favor of the /nsfw/ board pls vote for it:
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7>>32210<we need to attract everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!yes
>why are you faggots so fucking election-braineda revolution also needs <everyone
>>33448>siberia is just a dumping board and traffic doesn't matter<but I don't want it to be splitSome threads are made on siberia because other boards are /sfw/ you idiot, not because they're actually /siberia/ dump content.
>create a second dumping board. Nobody is asking for a second dumping board, you're misrepresenting the question.
>>33453>Some threads are made on siberia because other boards are /sfw/ Yeah, take the hint.
And you are exactly asking for a second dump board if you want a smut one. Think before posting, retard.
Unique IPs: 15