>>521820Yes precisely. This gives meaning to "phallus" apart from "penis", where as lacan would say, "there is no sexual relation", in this case, of the male topping with his ass, and so *self-penetrating* as an act of ideological appropriation. The woman, even as the supposed fuck-er is still the "object" of the male's subjectivity.
But this is why lacan sublates freud's oedopus complex with castration, since phallus is always ideological, and the subject is always "feminine". The forced nature of "making" the woman free in her role as dominator is a false transcendence (the same way putting women as action stars is).
The free relation is the impotence of the man, where he is castrated as an authentic subject. The woman is simply given, like the mother. This is why the "phallus" is essentially penile, but is not the penis itself.