tell me your most unhinged historical larpy sex fetish. don't tell me you have none, all imageboard addicts and history lovers have a few. sharing the few larps i caught in my lifetime
a girl fantasizing about being a european queen owning a harem of male slaves eating her out
a guy fantasizing about being a roman soldier and fucking boudica, or letting her take out all her anger and frustration on him with severe rape
being enlaved by dacian female raiders
fucking roman girls in toga while disscussing philosophy
being an icelandic skinny guy and getting captured and sold into gay slavery in the ottoman harem
young stalin
young drugged out hitler
being a conquistador and fucking everything from aztec girls to japanese geishas, to moor pricesses
306 posts and 159 image replies omitted.>>729861So I like thick women because I want to breed them all day? Interesting.
>>729865It's not "breeding" they are not cattle
>>729866humans are animals
>>729861unrelated but what if i love both? assa, booba, thighs, mouth, elbows YES ELBOWS
no feet though. feets are for =>omega males (enjoying the lowliest parts that are vital in all despite their dertiness, clearly subservient and lecherous, brain developed sideways)
>>729868what about armpits bro, absolute kino you cant just forget about them
I want to fuck Ea nasir so much bros…
>>735854Too many panels before the punchline
Also missed opportunity to make a joke about how wns are obsessed with interracial porn
>>739903
lol I remember this from archeological news from a couple of years ago, but weren't those paintings carved on trees?
>>739903
On tree bark (whitoids too stupid to invent paper)
>>741222I still prefer bunda but as long as they post ladies showing their goodies I'm good
>>741653boobs size doesn't correlate to milk capacity,it's mostly aesthetic
now if she had more than two,we can talk about feeding a lot of them
>>741222Boobs are communist because they create a valuable resource that can’t be commodified by the bourgeoisie
Ass is reactionary because it provides nothing and is purely aesthetic
"femboys are the choice of a man in peace with homosexuality but also his hypermasculinity, to have a femboy by your side is the ultimate gratification, it means you're so masculine, so worthy of love that another man feels girly by it and wants to be in your manly arms, usually someone youthful and younger, it means he unironically wants to be your girly woman so bad, he wants to act feminine for you and himself, and feels okay with taking it in the ass if its a man so protective as YOU!, to take your penis and cum in his ass or frot with your bigger penis either without feelings of shame of being a passive "failed" man, or in spite of it because he feels safe and protected from society in your embrace, and if the trap does has a bigger penis? he still looks like a girl, he still wants to be your baby girl despite being a man, even despite having the bigger dick he'd still not care about its virility for being your wife is a better thrill, the ultimate submission to be another man's cum receiver despite your manhood, get yourself a femboy who unlike women, cannot get period blood, does not have hysteria, cannot pregnant accidentally yet still wants to passivly be your sex partner and care about your feelings, it also means his dad who created now has to know his son is getting the semen of another man, so you're still an alpha male, to have a femboy is to have an idealist in love with you, willing to combat his masculinity and be your boywife that cooks meals for both of you and cleans your penis with his own girly penis" - Plato
>>741843"tomboys are the real reality we should aspire for, femboys? pure idealism, femboys will hit puberty one day, and grow old turn into femmen, and also a femboy is a man debasing himself to acting cutsey, acting feminine, while tomboys seek to conquer their masculine side while still appearing beautiful as women, if not cultivating a new beauty despite losing some of their feminine attractivness, masculinity is always associated with strength, a woman becoming manly? isn't debasing, she's adding attributes! scythian amazonian women, kushite warrior ladies, tomboys can be women unapologetically, while still working hard and acting manly, how can you not love such a creature? she might not be docile, but she is not trying to be weak! a tomboy knows women aren't stronger than men on average, but doesn't care!, the tomboy is the ultimate traditional wife if she's loyal, she's not looking for a patriarch dad to guide her or pay for her, but a partner to equally love! that's as gratifying as femboys if not even more! she does not have the weak artistery hobbies of women, but she conquers that of men anyway!, imagine the child of a man and a tomboy traditional wife! whom both his dad and mom both are buff, do not look for drama, have armors in their closet from fighting in war, and can carry a giant log from working in farms all day…he will be a monster of a man…both his mom and dad being masculine, the perfect couple in this real world we live in, where both genders act tough yet united, who work by day and by night decide who gets to dominate and tease the other, imagine having a woman with clear mesmerizing abs jumping on your dick with pride because she wants to and knows it…wouldn't that be a sight"-aristotle
Actual poem adressed by Gaius Catullus addresed to Furius Bibaculus, another poet, and Aurelius Messalinus, a senator of his time.
>I will sodomize you and face-fuck you, (can be interpreted in latin as "i will rape your mouth and ass")
>bottom Aurelius and catamite Furius,
>you who think, because my poems
>are sensitive, that I have no shame.
>For it's proper for a devoted poet to be moral
>himself, [but] in no way is it necessary for his poems.
>In point of fact, these have wit and charm,
>if they are sensitive and a little shameless,
>and can arouse an itch,
>and I don't mean in boys, but in those hairy old men
>who can't get it up.
>Because you've read my countless kisses,
>you think less of me as a man?
>I will sodomize you and face-fuck you.
was he a rapper of his era or just into both of them? eitherway hot
>>743622this is what the christians took from us
>>743622And people get mad at teens for listening to rap.
The vast majority of these are wartime fantasies about either raping the enemy or having consensual sex with your comrades.
What is the material explanation for the lack of fantasies about having consensual hate sex with the enemy or gangraping the smallest member of the platoon.
>>753385The Ottomans… The Rvm… the Blasian Shambala Yakvb
>Aztec prostitutes in the Precolmbian period were known as ahuianime (pl.)or ahuiani (s.), which meant pleasure women. In some recorded dialogues between native women, this term is used as an insult, comparing it to having an itchy butt, and being a flabby old women.
>Despite this they were tolerated as they were said to accompany warriors who went off on campaigns to war. Often sleeping beside them as companions, cooking and taking care of them.
>In some cases they even participated in the battles themselves on the sidelines like cheerleaders to taunt the enemy. They did this by yelling insults, and flashing the enemy their butt and genitalia. Torquemada, the Spanish chronicler suggests they even participated in battle too, wearing their own armor. Interestingly, in the Codex Mendoza, where the Aztecs recorded the tributes they imposed on their conquered cities (altepetl's) we find some Huastec style full body armor without a loincloth. Loincloths were the essential male garment and it's what identified you as a man as a skirt was to a woman. It might seem like an artist error, but this is repeated in copies, so perhaps this is deliberate.
>The ahuianime were said to also be sorcerers and something men cautioned their boys about. They use sorcery to seduce boys, and had knowledge of potion drinks they gave to youths, or offered them hallucinogenic mushrooms. One of their potions was made of several seashells, a particular snake and some other ingredients, made into a soupy drink. This was supposedly to allow a man to cum three or four or more times. This was considered dangerous though as Aztecs believed semen was finite and if a boy wasted too much in his youth he'd be useless for his wife in the future in his adulthood, would not be able to produce a family and/or not be able to ejaculate again. Or even in some cases, they'd 'dry' up and die.
wtf aztecs
>>748134H O R S E P U S S Y
Unique IPs: 40