lets be honest the other thread was starting to get full
555 posts and 113 image replies omitted.>>701466>You accuse posters of homosexuality, but like, big hairy powerlifter looking dudes are not sex symbols among women, but gay men.I accuse him because he/you spam the thread with these images. You don't even write an accompanying text half the time. I posted one set of images to answer the retarded question:
>What is a masculine?I'm not big into football, and I have his face seared into my brain from the Pat Tillman story, so he just jumped into my head as an example of what a very masculine and also very beautiful/pretty guy looks like, he could/would be maybe one of those twinks posted if he wasn't into sports and shit and was instead into taking slut photos for instagram like a woman.
and in IRL. Women want a man who is respected by other men. You can't look weak in front of another man, that's one of the biggest turn offs for women.
>>701468I havent seen Taylor Swift fans talking much about how they want to fuck her. But I can go to instagram account of one of those pretty boys you claim appeal only to homosexuals and comments will be full of women doing precisely that.
>inb4 not real lifeYou can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
>>701475
>You can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
How young are we talking dude? They call things boy bands and teeny bopper music. Like are you trying to pickup preteens?
>inb4 not real life
>You can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
Alright bro, believe what you want.
<big hairy powerlifter looking dudes are not sex symbols among women,
Like I suppose they say Prince was a "sex symbol." But where have you ever seen 5'4 midgets in stockings cleaning up with women.
I really don't know how to further explain real life to you because you refuse to interact with it.
But moving on.
Why do you spam the threads with these images of twinks taking slut photos? Why can't you answer that part?
>>701478>But where have you ever seen 5'4 midgets in stockings cleaning up with women.I didnt, nobody claims otherwise, height is universally attractive among women. Even women who are into famished tender skinned twins like them tall.
>images of twinks taking slut photos? With rare exceptions, images posted do not feature twinks, but very much masculine hunks build like Olympic athletes. Wide shoulders, giant pecks, chiselled abs, bulging biceps, veiny forearms. Its just that your idea of masculinity seems to be shaped by watching too many 80s action movies, so now you think anything short of prime Arnold is unmasculine.
>>701485>I didnt, nobody claims otherwise, height is universally attractive among women. Even women who are into famished tender skinned twins like them tall.So I'm saying, what is a "sex symbol" is largely irrelevant when we're talking about general preference.
>>701485>With rare exceptions, images posted do not feature twinks, but very much masculine hunks build like Olympic athletes. Wide shoulders, giant pecks, chiselled abs, bulging biceps, veiny forearms. Its just that your idea of masculinity seems to be shaped by watching too many 80s action movies, so now you think anything short of prime Arnold is unmasculine.No you post pictures of obvious homosexuals. And you are also an obvious homosexual and why do you refuse to answer:
>Why do you spam the threads with these images of twinks taking slut photos? Why can't you answer that part?What is the porpoise?
>>701461Umm wrong.
>>701457So you think men who don't look like muscular behemoths are low T men who appeal to homosexuals?
>>701481Apparently you never interact with women IRL. Boy band musicians are ogled after by post pubescent females as well.
>>701487Methinks you're a troll
>>701478Prince was a real looker. He was a basketball ball player and a musician. That's why he could get women.
He's a sex symbol because of his looks
>>701481Now this is bullshit copium.
Preteen girls are not really afraid of finding things they like fully sexy. And apparently you never ever visited Tumblr or Archive Of Our Own
You sound like some 1980s/90s jock
>>701573I hate to quote that meme but "Are you literally me"? Everything you said is exactly how my life went so far.
Tbh, romantic love isn't automatic guarantee for everyone
>>701702Sorry but I don't speak auto-misandry
>>701670Women have agency but they don't like responsibility.
That's why most girl bosses whenever they hit a problem, they immediately look for their male associates to help them out despite talking shit about men as incompetent leaders.
>>701704Perhaps but then if you don't ask permission she may accuse you of sexual predation.
Damned if you, damned if you don't
This is why coomers are smart.
Only deal with women platonically
>>701711>Perhaps but then if you don't ask permission she may accuse you of sexual predation.It unironically doesn't matter, if she has no proof the government doesnt care. If there's no legal repercussions then all you gotta do is block her on all socials and move on with your life.
Ask yourself, would you rather die a virgin or be mildly embarrassed by some crazy woman you'll probably never meet again?
>>701750Evidence or bullshit.
And can we please stop reducing male value to sexual reproduction?
I guarantee if only one-fifth of the male population got to fuck, then that means females weren't all valued either for procreation
>>701753>And can we please stop reducing male value to sexual reproduction?That's not something "we" are doing but something women and the society you exist in do all on their own. It really doesn't matter if incels "find their own happiness" or not. In fact, that's what normies want you to do: retreat into your basement and abandon dating entirely so they don't have to exist around you anymore.
>I guarantee if only one-fifth of the male population got to fuck, then that means females weren't all valued either for procreationThere's a pretty basic biological issue you're ignoring here: a man can impregnate multiple women in a short timespan, while a woman is inevitably limited by the downtime inbetween pregnancies. powerful men inevitably seek to impregnate as many (different) women as possible to maximize his descendants. not really the case for women.
>>701759>>701760>>701762Again this is some copiun. Even if one man can impregnate multiple women, you're forgetting that women can have issues too.
If only one fifth of all men fucked, that doesnt mean that vast majority of women fucked.
This mentality you guys have is very shallow.
>That's not something "we" are doing but something women and the society you exist in do all on their own. You guys talk more about sex than any normie space I've ever been on.
>It really doesn't matter if incels "find their own happiness" or not. In fact, that's what normies want you to do: retreat into your basement and abandon dating entirely so they don't have to exist around you anymore.Now this is sounding like retarded schizo bs.
This is persecution complex that we condemn rightoids for.
>>701759>How does that make any sense? It is just the same guys with multiple female partners. Humans don't have much genetic diversity, because of that and a genetic chokepoint in our history.Your theory doesn't make sense. One guy having multiple female partners doesn't mean vast majority of women were taken. You're forgetting that women can be born infertile or die in pregnancy.
You're also forgetting that women can be rejected for lacking any tits or hips to rear children with.
>>701808Also "humans don't have much genetic diversity" because genetic diversity in general has a limit for any and all species.
Genes are not like universal lego structures that can be swapped out on a whim.
Even in perfect conditions, there are limits before hereditary disorders start happening
Unique IPs: 27