lets be honest the other thread was starting to get full
>>696513Last time I had sex: Never
Next time I will have sex: Never
>>696693I mean tbf US elections function as some sort of sublimated clan wars complete with all the nebulous unwritten rules
>>696729>49 wivesHoly fucking shit man this is some Bronze age warlord tier lifestyle
>>696513> at what age did you have sex (of any kind) for the first time, and what kind of sex was it?19, unless you count being invited to touch on a girl who was a grade above me at school in 7th grade.
i just kind of set my hand there and let her crush it into the gravel because i was too afraid to start rubbing on it and we never had sex ed. also i was literally 13/14! we had already done other stuff together before that like her giving me her panties to jerk off into
>>696754i still continued to post on r9k despite this
she let me feel her tits too at school later in the year which were literally massive triple D and i just kind of lightly rested my hand atop them and didn’t actually full on grope them, i was such a fool
>>696754gravel?
>like her giving me her panties to jerk off intohawt
>>696513I was 17. It was a threesome. A dude wanted to fuck this chick at a house party, but the chick wanted to fuck me. So he begged me to join a threesome. Unfortunately she spread the rumor that the guy had a tiny pecker afterwards.
I was drunk and high but I could consent. Don't regret it either but I'd never do that again
>>696902Nope. It's a cishet site with AGP inclination.
>>696968And this is the same dialogue we pathologise the right for producing/suggesting.
Leftypol really is just another chud hub
>>697003holy shit newgene is back
what happened man? you missed an entire thread
>>697017These are the same takes that you condemn chudd for having.
Also, women being oppressed and sometimes having an upper hand is not chud logic.
But , the rest of the book sentiments is chuddery, especially considering youth as "le eternal conqueror".
Youth is not automatic idealism that "fonds a way".
That is usually a minority of youth or mainly adults with power
>>697009>>697013For God's sake stop calling it "blackpill".
It's redpill
Blackpill is not giving a fuck and realizing that all things are a farce.
Redpill is just people wanting to be part of the in group but acting "too cool for you".
>>697013the entire point is telling men the main reason you can't get laid or find love, is because women simply do not like your face or height, claim both first, then not only will a woman be intrested and attracted to you, treat you with more affection, but society itself would love you for doing nothing in particular at all, eveyone grows old and die, so become attractive and then old is better than being ugly and treated horribly and then grow old
black pillers believe if you look extremely hot enough, people would treat you better, and they aren't wrong
>>697026Attractive people get more hatred than you think. They're always blamed for moral decay.
Ugly people are hated but they get sympathized.
It's the average looking people whom are the toxic ones.
Also, it's not black pill, it's redpill
>>697027>Ugly people are hated but they get sympathized.it is semi true and depends on the person
as for black pill redpill it comes from imageboard terms turning normie and losing what original idea they had, you're right about redpill black pill but who cares enough
>>697009lol poor guy
>eating meat makes ya a gigaphotogeniccan any smart anons confirm? if true why don't inuits living on meat alone their entire lives have gigachad features? is it solely four legged cattle meat? no fish or seals?
>>697127Are you referring to
>>697097 or
>>697093 as "alpha-male garbage"?
>>697134This
>>697130Westerners don't eat sugar.
It's all high-fructose corn syrup
>>697149How is it blackpill?
Redpill is whining about not being able to join "the cool kids table".
Whining about lookism is redpill
>>697152>Redpill is whining about not being able to join "the cool kids table".no, redpill is a bunch of self-sucking fucking retards circlejerking
please sybau newfag
>>697210>>697211>Lurk more>Newfag>SybauSorry but this isn't 4chan
Take your shitty alumni complex elsewhere.
>>697215>Take your shitty alumni complex elsewhereyoure the one parading into the thread acting as an authority on
ALREADY FUCKING ESTABLISHED terms.
>>697216>despite being the least developed when it comes to socialisation, career, and other aspects of lifesource: trust me guys
>image boards are obsessed with appearing "mature"you made a specific reference to a high school pecking order which does not exist in real life. shut your fucking mouth you are a guest here and likely underaged
>>697220>you made a specific reference to a high school pecking order which does not exist in real life. shut your fucking mouth you are a guest here and likely underagedYou act like a typical failed adult who thinks everyone who disagrees with them is "underage".
You're making a caricature in your head that doesn't really exist
>>697221Again, thanks for proving my point
You're using the word "adult" to mean a pretentious impression that doesn't really mean what you think it does.
>>697224incorrect, low effort, opinion disregarded
stop derailing the thread with your incomprehensible ramblings
>>697225Typical sophomoric adult on an obscure chatroom.
Do you talk like this in meat space?
Probably not because you'd get your face punched in
You're using terms like "newfag" and "lurk more".
That's more "juvenile"
>>697228Or what?
You wanna go cry to the mods like you usually do?
Only thing you know how to do anyway
>>697230oh wow that's really cutting anon. ouch. that really hurts me deeply
mods can you pop this dumbass
>>697235You must be some underage that switched bodies with an adult.
Or maybe an adult with severe pretensions.
More likely the latter.
>>697241>>697240Jesus Christ you're still crying over a couple of neologisms and getting defensive over "chan culture"?
And you wanna talk about "acting like an adult"?
And like the typical image oard user you wanna name drop mainstream platforms as slurs despite your previous obscire forums screenshotting posts from Reddit, Twitter, and TikTok to drive discussion and having the most absurd clout.
>>697140I'm referring to
>>697097 because there's a lot of garbage out there from pick up artists about how in le ancient times the Chad alpha fucked all the hoes and you gotta be the Chad and sexual selection is just neoliberal market economics bro and has always been that way for 10,000 years ignoring the vast arrays of ways that human societies have organized themselves in history, and I'm assuming that's what he had in mind when he posted about how tribal societies are actually brutal for romance man cause we all know ancient humanity was just Conan the Barbarian
>>697276No I don't believe the "Chad fucked all the hoes".
Im referring to how there was a lot less amenities back then which meant mem had to bust their asses even more for female approval.
Also, do you know that the Middle Ages being supposedly the ghetto phase of European history was a myth invented by Enlightenment philosophers?
>>697357if i saw a man shaped like gumball in real life i would cum volumes in his belly
destroy that ass
lick that tummy
hug that belly
kiss that mouth
spit on that thing
grab on that chocker
fondle that cock with mine
>>697315You guys are evil.
Wishing misery upon others just because they're happy and you're not.
And you accuse the right of "misery loves company".
>>697287Are you capable of feeling anything else other than jealousy or sadness?
>>697013Most of the procreation that lead to eight billion people is often in second/third world countries where procreation is treated more or less like a duty.
>>696538Because in cyberspace, there's no immediate physical punishment for transgression.
But in meatpaace, anonymity is zero and consequence are direct.
>>697396I'm struggling to understanding how much of a sheltered dork you have to be if you believe being envious or miserable is the apogee of evil lol
either way, you can't accuse anyone of being a proverb, you fucking moron
>>697405This is rich coming from people who accuse the world of being fascist for not wanting to have sex with you for not being hot enough.
Also, it's not so much envy but rather the constant bitterness and entitlement you reek of, wishing misery upon those who are happy.
>>697423Personally, I don't give a shit about if you're envious or not or whatever the fuck you guys do or feel with your make-believe girlfriends and friends, I'm just pointing out that you're a drooling retard
If you're worried about people being bitter, maybe you should stop crying about perceived slights you read on a imageboard you fucking loser lol
>>697435Why are so obsessed with my opinions, man?
>You're a drooling retardHow?
Just because I don't sympathize with your whining?
And it's funny you post that pic because that's how most of you talk about wanting to do because some female passerby didn't give you the time of day
If you really are butthurt about me being "obsessed" with others bitterness, why don't you feel butthurt about imageboard users obsessing over what women jerk off to?
>>697435>If you're worried about people being bitter, maybe you should stop crying about perceived slights you read on a imageboard you fucking loser lolI wish you guys would follow this advice when you come across ragebait
Also, do you talk like this in meat space?
Or are you as quiet and scared as a mouse?
Because we can meet up in the flesh to talk face to face
>>697431This is a psyop.
Women prefer men with Android phones bc they are typically trapping off them.
>>697771What is holding you back?
>>697775>fucking hookers/sexual promiscuityThose two thinks are not really equivalents.
>>697777Nice digits. I think they are. At least when considering gender. As an incel that fucks hookers, I honestly feel like the equivalent of a sexually promiscuous women that fucks randos. Like I expect these women to love me, and when they don’t, I’m upset. But when they do, I don’t believe them and just continue fucking other hookers. I’m starting therapy me because jfc. I’ve probably spent like 10k on hookers and have cried and lost so much sleep over them.
>>697778This pisses me off
>>697780>But when they do, I don’t believe themBecause they dont love you. Obviously.
>>697781Anon, unironically go see a psychiatrist. Prostitutes dont love you, and they dont enjoy having sex with you. They might say they do, that is their job. But they dont.
>>697782Over the span of like 3 years. The first of which was a light year.
>>697784I’ve maybe fucked like 60+ and like three legitimately were interested in me as a partner. But I didn’t believe them. I was recently unsettled when one started dating someone else. I used to sleep with her most days for free, and we went on dates. Like I used to spend 8+ hours in her room sleeping, not just sex. We talked about our families and shit. So I lost it when she found someone else, even though I recognize that I didn’t really communicate my interest well because of my low self esteem and skepticism. She was upset at times, but I didn’t really know how to articulate my feelings. I remember her crying once. But I resented her for being a whore. Another hooker revealed that she was interested in me after I went to her talking about the aforementioned. And another that was emotionally more unsettled than me is still interested in me. And we were fucking without payment for like a month. But she was always threatening to see other guys and just being generally shitty. We started texting again but I have no interest in dating her despite her being overtly interested in me. I’m starting therapy soon and am writing essentially a paper on my life up until this point. I’ve been in therapy before but was too embarrassed to discuss this.
>>697777>What is holding you back?quads of truth i should work on it more
first height is pretty short for someone in their 20s
balding is beggining
20% fats
jawline visible but not large enough
and i have no idea what to develop to get such an aesthetic
>>697785>Hyperindividualism>Unprecedented lonelinessThe more this talk about "loneliness" and "hyper individualism" goes on, the more I think it's hogwash.
We don't have hyper-individualism.
We have atomization.
If we were individualistic, people wouldn't be so inclined to chase the same cliche desires.
We wouldnt have deficiency in the labor and educational markets
People are NOT individualised and they're NOT lonely
They're estranged.
>>697779Just like I've added
>Back to Reddit as my chanspeak collection
>>697788>>697790I kinda understand this feeling.
At this point, if you were to pursue a relationship, it will be too taxing for you.
I think you're better off having a romantic relationship in your head. Just make fanfics of your favorite fictional characters.
>>698013Then care for your trans wife.
>Its mutual processNo its not, she is the one who carries the child, you might help her with life and stuff, but you dont help her with pregnancy.
>>698032gated communities still need garbagemen. society is an ecosystem.
>>698033i suggest you touch grass. things arent as bad as you imagine.
>>698034F
>>698040having children is a selfish decision and its always been that way.
>b-but youre saying we should go extinct!!!we will go extinct regardless considering more than half the planet will turn into a desert in the next 30 years thanks to climate change
>>698052>only rich people should have childrengood advice, comrade
>>698043>cant answer questions>constant deflection to circle back to juvenile pessimismim bored of you
>>698053Nice strawman you have there.
Again, do you think it's right to have children willy-nilly with no career, no skill set, no resolve, no abode?
>>698054its not ideal but it works for a lot of people.
i was raised this way.
>>698053If being concerned about the state of the world is juvenile pessimism to you, idk what to tell you
If things are as good as you say, do you agree that the fear of AI is just projection?
That the "loneliness epidemic" is just people exaggerating their frustration?
>>698061Bad people wreak havoc on the planet making life worse for everyone else.
Life does find a way but that doesn't mean it's always good
>>698065These people here cannot fathom others as people.
They're already so self-absorbed in their own misery
How the hell can you expect them to empathize with children as fellow human beings?
>>698062Didn't say that
God, image board users are dumb.
>>698070life is better than death
>How the hell can you expect them to empathize with children as fellow human beings?<le life is sufferingtake your antidepressants already
>>698071so what did you mean, then?
>>698080so youre arbitrarily deciding that life scavenging for food is better for a child who cant even consent to it?
just admit you want to have children because youre going through a midlife crisis. this is 99% of parents, none of you actually care about kids
>>698092>life scavenging for food<anons please join me for a moment in imagining a hypothetical “irresponsible” parent you are no different from the rightoids you purportedly oppose
fully expecting you to next argue that “impoverished people simply will not think to take up employment unless the government threatens them with the loss of their healthcare coverage”
>>698101so if you could press a button to exterminate all life on earth, you would do it?
>>698102>im a hypocriteat least you admit to your intellectual errors
>>698099>It was a suggestion, not an order anon.stop hiding behind plausible deniability and say it with your chest strasserite
and you didn’t answer my question
>>698107>no lol, this is the future for 90% of the planet. agriculture will collapse and entire continents will become entirely uninhabitable. this is the optimistic scenario btwyou didn’t say
<“having kids in an imagined dystopian future sure would suck”in your post anon
and even if you did, we’re still at odds here
nothing you have said in your previous posts has read as anything other than poorly constructed bait, i refuse to take you seriously
>>698080>>698095>>698115Natalists think kids are mere trophies to be unlocked with no concern about their prospects
Yet they think kids growing up with electronic media is the worst thing ever.
These same people are butthurt about seeing kids growing up with better prospects than them
>>698123sounds like you are projecting personal baggage
hope things get better for you
>>698124Not projecting Im just saying.
But ok then, maybe you should say the same to:
>>697315>>697287>>697287>>696968 >>698324Of course not
There will be things you can never enjoy with whatever personality type you are.
Married couples will secretly envy single people for not having to deal with pissy partners or children
But then they realize they feel belonged where they are.
>>698356How do you guys establish boundaries and ick between the multitude of ppl in a polycule
Like i assume this is an actual relationship and not just a buncha dudes who rent the same property together and call themselves poly for progressive cred reasons
>>698359And it interest me because poly is in many ways similar to democracy
It's a relatively "new" form of social relationship where you don't have predefined roles so people would have to discuss and negotiate their roles with others much like in a democracy (esp if one of the partners get pregnant and you get kids in the equation)
>>698651male gaze activated
female gaze icked
>>698497Only the more rabid ones.
It's just like stereotyping lolicons
>>698773>It appeals to misogyni, Are we going by the actual definition or the knee-jerk reaction definition?
Not that red pill isnt chauvinistic/patronizing because it is.
>>698702>>698763I wanted to refrain from the word consumerism for this exact reason; I meant to say they've been shaped by the institutional effect of workplace disciplining and commodification to the point that they lack their own inner-subjectivity.
GOOD FUCKING NEWS: The local benefits office pays me next week, so the first fucking thing I'm doing is buying a cheap smartphone so I can live my fucking life again.
21st century worker superstitions are defined by unconscious class anxieties and their relation to those commodities which are involved in the production of their own sociality: phones, televisions, even books. Anything which is defined as a source of pleasure is to be subject to rationing and negated, under the principle that excessive enjoyment violates some unspoken social injunction or law.
This moron then ends up in self-regulating habits which perpetuate their own misery because they can and cannot seperate their own sources of joy in the world from their function as a bourgeois consumer. These idiots engage in some perverted ideological function whereby the self-accumulation of enjoyment (pleasure) is subject to their neurotic need for control, to the degree that they're unable to reflect on their own immediate behaviours.
They are completely unable to view their own alienation as a product of anything but their own internal experience and hence can never sublate it: they never realise they are being sold back the conditions of their own pleasure because pleasure itself (desire) has become the operant principle which defines their existence.
Thus, this idiot whom I live with, is defined in such a deeply ironic way by the same logic with which their workplace conditions them into being a model worker, that they exact the same capitalist administritative tasks not just in their own life but in the regulation of others.
If any of you have made sense of any of what I've just written, please to god read up on the Society Of Control by Foucault. This person is so deeply embedded in the logic of this system that every interaction sets my fucking teeth on edge.
The moment I buy a fucking smartphone and have unlimited access to the internet I end this retard's attempt to control my subjective experience.
>>698819>Anything which is defined as a source of pleasure is to be subject to rationing and negated, under the principle that excessive enjoyment violates some unspoken social injunction or law. To make something of this post and explain this in an immediately comprehensible way to all of you: if you ever meet the prototypical office worker who is obsessed with their own "mental health", this sentence quoted is the part you want to understand.
The crude fetishism and abstract concept of "healthy" or "health" is a logic of control meant to enforce a degree of rational behaviour in logics of consumption. When some philosopher (sniff) talks about consumers spontaneously producing their own subjectivity, it is because it appears to the individual as though their desire to behave or act in this way is their own, when really it is the end result of a long chain of external forces which shape them to this end.
In short, whenever you meet some fucker who uses the word "mental health" or calls something that they don't like for no other reason that they can't explain "unhealthy", run to the fucking hills.
They are grade A narcissists and useful little wannabe bourgeois sociopaths who given an ounce of power will reproduce the world in the image of their chosen god.
>>698731highly likely
t. have cheated on pretty much everyone i have ever dated
my bodycount is like ~16?
this is penetration only btw, it is probably double depending what u count
>>698836>playing the role of an idiot>inner psychological fantasy >else I will literally be homelessso many questions
i’m afraid i’m going to have to tap the sign anon
>>698851since we associate inceldom with introvert behavior but most importantly, facial ugliness, they might sense you're an "incel" or never been in a relatioship or kissed before from it. frankly don't bother, before incel they refer to people like that as creeps, neckbeards, nice guys. losers, nerd and geek is the oldest term i know about for socially awkward people who look unattractive
so if you're saying can people tell right away you're an incel, it depends on the cartoon we think of one…ugly or awkward..both people might think indicate you're a virgin
>>698865This
Socially awkward males were always the butt of jokes.
And they're always blamed for sexual assault.
The irony is,the meanest people are often the average folk. Both in looks and personality
>>698762not having a committed partner (or partners) by age 36 is a bit weird.. lol
bro has no roster + no motion
>>698980It's only weird by traditionalist standards.
Besides I thought we were about despooking people?
That includes not giving a fuck about lack of romantic prosperity in post-prime adulthood
>>697130I remember an article about this. Something about how hunter-gatherer children eat tough food while industrial children eat soft food that messes up their tooth alignment and gives them problems with their wisdom teeth later.
Another thing people notice is that hunter-gatherers tend to have really good skin and hair, at least when they're young.
>>699003>they just consoom instagram reels or tiktok *ALL DAY*. to me that just sounds fucking exhausting. like, when i doomscroll on tiktok for only 30 minutes it already feels like it stole my soul and life energy for the rest of the day. dont they ever get bored? guilty? like theyre wasting their life away?Youre not really worn but why do you think TikTok and Instagram is so bad by virtue of doomscrool as if though image boards are any better?
>and the shit they watch is the most safe neoliberal slop ive ever seen, it might aswell be generated by AI. for example, women love to watch rich fucks doing boring shit: cooking, driving somewhere, doing their makeup, like the fact that theyre rich faggots makes it interesting somehow.Its no different from men following their favorite political pundit or wrestler or rapper doing a video blog.
Also, nice job using "AI generation" as a slur.
>like the fact that theyre rich faggots makes it interesting somehow. and theres always these retarded trends like labubus and shit, which all amount to massive marketing schemes to promote the new product youre supposed to consoom to virtue signal to the rest of the world and show them how hip you are. and women eat it all up. i mean, you can shit all you want on men who waste thousands of dollars buying funko pops but women are a lot worse in that regard.The only thing that makes me sympathize with you is that women will nitpick mens hobbies far too much while wasting money on new outfits and shoes that will sit in their closet for a half-decade before wearing them.
>anyways this shit turned me asexual i cant lieGood. One less potential incel/simp.
>>>699011Alot of those soft foods are processed. Also I'm sure hunter gathers had soft foods like soup and vegetable mash.
>>699019If we assume that "no bitches" means "no job, no hygiene, no morals" then it's no wonder.
>>699020Flexing on a mid-tricenarian male over sexual experience?
Inageboards really are no different from Twitter
### 🧠 Core Themes
- Sexual and Romantic Frustrations:
- Users share experiences of rejection, late virginity, hiring sex workers, and feelings of inadequacy.
- Some describe emotional entanglements with prostitutes, leading to confusion and distress.
- Masculinity and Physical Appearance:
- Discussions around "blackpill" and "redpill" ideologies, which link romantic success to physical traits like height and jawline.
- Debates on how society treats unattractive versus attractive men and the psychological impact.
- Power Dynamics and Fetishes:
- The thread explores fetishes such as female domination, pegging, and fantasies involving tribal figures or humiliation.
- Posts often blend humor, absurdity, and genuine desire.
- Critiques of Modern Dating Culture:
- Complaints about dating apps, superficiality, and difficulty forming meaningful connections.
- Some users express longing for idealized or "storybook" romances.
- Philosophical and Political Reflections:
- Conversations about natalism, the desire to have children versus concerns about the planet’s future.
- Criticism of capitalism, alienation, and how societal structures shape human desire.
—
### ⚠️ Important Notes
- The content is highly explicit, often vulgar, and mixes humor, venting, and provocation.
- Some posts may be considered offensive or problematic, including misogynistic language, racial fetishization, and references to suicide.
- The thread serves as a cathartic space for anonymous users, with minimal moderation or filtering.
—
If you'd like, I can help you explore one of these themes more deeply or extract constructive insights from the chaos. Want to dive into any specific topic?
>>697315meh, they've been together for 10 years
i wouldn't wish anything bad
it's too sweet
just sucks that i'll never have that experience
but i unironically talked to chatgpt, and i feel okay
not everyone can have everything, i'll have my own love at adulthood :/
just hurts, it won't be picture perfect, sweet, like some who will end up marrying the ones they've known since childhood, GOD
i shouldn't have come back here
>>697398im also capable of feeling love and romance, what are you doing next friday, night babe
>>698889Smegma Male
>>698913it saves budget
>>699571The truth is:
Romantic love is fickle.
We've been taught that love is good and lust is bad.
But I'm here to tell you that lust is bad, but love is worse.
Say what you want about lust.
But it's honest and brief.
It is appreciative of flaws/nuances that would otherwise is vomit-inducing/annoying/embarrassing in a normal state of mind
Love on the other hand is obsessed with perfection and permanence of specific characteristics.
It's intolerant of change or shortcoming.
It doesn't take much to make a person fall out of love.
You can send as many gifts and amenities as you want but if they don't feel any affection for you, they'll give it to someone they think is hot.
>>699634Greekgaze or Turkgaze
call it
>>699885>leftwingmeaningless
>nazi-codedeven more meaningless
its just fucking music lol
>>699989NTA but:
Bruh wtf is your problem?
"You know what they meant"?
It's all useless labelling
>>700277>flagi am noticing but if i speak i will get banned
one thing conservatives are right about is modern dating is full of people who are incredibly afraid of masculinity or assertiveness or being seen as "pushy" in any way and have defaulted to acting helpless and infantilizing themselves in an attempt to avoid being called a creep even though it's just as gross and creepy when someone is pushing their weird femdom fetish onto strangers.
the center-left, center-right, and succdem circles are especially full of these dorks. they're absolutely clueless to what "healthy" masculinity or relationships look like and just shed it entirely rather than risking getting canceled. pretty sad.
also, use xcancel you faggot.
>>700231It is made for kids. Just because it has bizarre elements doesn't mean that it isn't.
By that definition, most children's media of past and present isn't made for kids even though kids can and do enjoy bizarre elements
>>700300This. Highly agree.
Masculinity is reduced to servitude. Either for some dumb brutish impression of "honor" or sucking up to screeching harping feminists
>>700277It's already a thing. The problem is, men aren't allowed to be the opposite of sycophancy
>>700340>>700327>>700300I dont think lily transflag cares much for masculinity.
>>700302>>700277The observation that this "step on me mommy" is an attempt to express horniness in a non-threatening way is a trife observation, and not particularly correct as people do it heteronormatively all the time and for males it is far more socially acceptable than acting submissive.
proposition:
in monogamous relationships, it is most ethical to breed with the same ethnic group, but in polygamy, it is unethical to only breed with the same ethnicity and instead, it is imperative to racemix with other ethnic groups. therefore, racemixing is only ethical, but simultaneously, the most ethical position, in the case of polygamy. a positive mandate must be made therefore, to legalise polygamy in the west, so as to achieve the ideal form of marriage and reproduction.
the ideal: polygamous racemixing
the moderate: monogamous race loyalty
the unethical: monogamous racemixing
discuss.
>>700610Why not for under thirty as well?
The earlier the better
>>700899So I guess she always drove everywhere in NY, so not the city.
I also am in need of an Asian woman to worship. Just treat her like anyone else and never say anything about your condition.
>>701091So when are we gonna admit that image boards rely on ragebait from mainstream platforms to drive user activity?
For all the whining about Reddit, TikTok, Twitter, etc you all seem to have an affinity for said sites for cyber-dumpster diving
>He's not just fit, he also has an insanely masculine and sculpted faceMasculine yes, wide jawline and chin, but he doesnt have those super sharp features you see on modern models.
>>701224>You're probably the same guy who is always spamming the thread with ladyboys aren't you?No.
>>701192>>701219>>701223no way we're in a chopped male epidemic if fuckin fabio is the bare minimum for being treated normally, like what's the maximum then? 10 ft tall gigachad squidward with a full set of hair?
it's true, becoming a ten outta ten girl is easier than becoming a normal handsom guy, just get thin, anorexic even. as a guy you need to be fabio. and you'll still be average
>>701219Ignorant assumption
>>701192It's considered "unrealistic" for any era
>>701224>>701233>Extremely masculine faceDefine "masculine" as a physiognomical aspect.
>>701236NTA but that's an ignorant assumption to make. How do you know it only appeals to gays and not women?
>>701245Again with this is solipsism?
It's not that easy becoming a "ten out of ten" girl.
You assume that because men are more receptive to attractive members of the opposite sex compared to women
Also, Fabio wouldn't be treated normally. He would be treated like royalty because hes a fashion model.
You would be treated normally.
>>701326if you're a man yeah, it's over
if you're a woman it doesn't matter, it's never too late because you live life on easy mode
>>701333Wrong on the second half. Women have a limited time of value. Once they hit their forties, it's over
Even if they're young, if they aren't curvy, light skinned, slim, or cutesy in behavior and fashion, it's over for them.
>>701340>Women have a limited time of value.Not anymore, hags are in demand these days as men realized older women are more worldly and interesting.
>if they aren't curvy, light skinned, slimnah none of this matters women of all body types can find love because men have diverse tastes
>cutesy in behavior and fashionyeah surprisingly heterosexual men are attracted to feminine qualities. you can't have your cake and eat it too: if you actively choose to present yourself in a specific way that repels the sex you seek to attract then don't be surprised when only dykes are into you. i find it kinda crazy that women complain about this but don't see a problem with shaming men for having nerdy hobbies or not being masculine enough. like at least try to present yourself to appeal to the opposite sex, in both cases tbh. people can't help their biological impulses.
>>701347>nah none of this matters women of all body types can find love because men have diverse tastesYes but most women don't reciprocate that.
>Not anymore, hags are in demand these days as men realized older women are more worldly and interesting.I wish people would stop pushing this meme.
Especially when your impression of "hags" is a woman in her THIRTIES.
Hags would be LITERAL ELDERLY women, as in SIXTY and up. Also, age numbers are not virtue points. Older doesn't necessarily mean wiser/worldly.
Especially if you're dealing with women who grew up in the church. Those church ladies are unworldly to a T and easily offended by any slight vulgarity.
Also you're forgetting that older women will already have emotional baggage from previous relationships, especially if they're parenting.
Again, if you think a tricenarian female is a hag, you have no perspective of aging
>yeah surprisingly heterosexual men are attracted to feminine qualities. you can't have your cake and eat it too: >if you actively choose to present yourself in a specific way that repels the sex you seek to attract then don't be surprised when only dykes are into you. i find it kinda crazy that women complain about this but don't see a problem with shaming men for having nerdy hobbies or not being masculine enough. like at least try to present yourself to appeal to the opposite sex, in both cases tbh. people can't help their biological impulses.Hard agree.
Im starting to lose sympathy for complaints about "lookism". Most of it is just sour grapes or tall poppy syndrome. It's just entitlement where people think they are owed perfect matches without having any good qualities to bring to the table.
If you want someone to give up a good chunk of their lives to you, you need to convince them why they should
Romantic relationships aren't some cute AU that you can conjue up and leave at a whim. It's time consuming and money draining.
Most people, at best, are mediocre in their looks, talents, assets, wits and even hygiene.
>>701378>Yes but most women don't reciprocate that.What do you mean by this? That women aren't attracted to the men that they attract? Maybe that's their problem lmao.
>Again, if you think a tricenarian female is a hag, you have no perspective of agingI'm literally in my 30's tho and it's pretty normal for women on imageboards in this age group to call themselves hags.
>Im starting to lose sympathy for complaints about "lookism". Most of it is just sour grapes or tall poppy syndrome. It's just entitlement where people think they are owed perfect matches without having any good qualities to bring to the table.>Most people, at best, are mediocre in their looks, talents, assets, wits and even hygiene.Yup. I don't have high standards but I kinda have a bias against the kinda people that insist they don't have to put ANY effort into their appearance or personality. Like, you can be mid attractiveness, fat, boring, etc but people are willing to overlook all those faults if you're willing to appeal to their tastes. There is absolutely nothing wrong with dating someone that is attracted to you for being chubby, or having huge/small tits, or your race, or skin color, or your fashion style, or your gender identity even. You have to maximize the positive traits you were born with to get your foot in the door. Once you're past that point it all kinda doesn't matter, they'll see you for you, but if you have nothing going on for you "on the surface" then on one is ever gonna take interest in you. At least present yourself in a positive way, if for no other reason than to entice strangers into thinking you bring positive vibes if they choose to interact with you. It isn't a big ask if your partner requests you do something to indulge their tastes either, tbh. Even if it's no big deal to you, dressing or acting a certain way occasionally can mean a lot to them. My ex(discord lol) really liked furry pet play, something I'm not really into, but for her sake I learned to appreciate it and get really into it just because it made her happy, and that made me happy. idunno why people are so negative in dating these days, only ever looking for excuses to reject eachother.
then again I'm a kissless handholdless virgin so what do I know
>>701394me too bro me too
can we make state mandated gf's a thing yet?
>>701396Yeah, it kinda drives me insane that my "type" is the kinda girl that looks totally plain but is in fact a total nutcase and will ruin your life and then immediately move on to her next victim without any regard for your feelings.
Ironically those girls are MORE menhera than the actual alt/jfashion/cosplay girls. Maybe that's why every one of those girls I meet is in a committed long term relationship. Feels bad man.
>>701402>Yeah, and I call myself retarded on imageboards but would never do that IRL or even to most online friends.same here, i would never let an irl or even a mutual hear me utter the word at this time. it's bad for business
im nonbinary and transfem btw
>>701399white girls have the female mass shooter archetype does that count?
also an asian girl from texas added me from 4ch/soc/ and I haven't fumbled it yet I think I'm in bros I just gotta hope I don't get kidnapped by ICE while trying to find true love across state lines.
>>701384>I'm literally in my 30's tho and it's pretty normal for women on imageboards in this age group to call themselves hags.Because they're shallow. It's too common nowadays for people in their late twenties/early thirties to refer themselves as old because they've been stuck in an adolescent state for too long.
>idunno why people are so negative in dating these days, only ever looking for excuses to reject eachother.>then again I'm a kissless handholdless virgin so what do I knowWanna know a secret?
Romance is more shallow than lust
Lust, while fleeting, is honest and appreciative of flaws.
In lust, you can gain a special kind of tolerance for flaws/nuances that wouldn't happen in sobriety.
Romance on the other hand, is obsessed with perfection and permanence in any preferred socio-physical traits.
Unfortunately, life doesnt like permanent perfection.
People change physically and psychologically.
Ever notice how people always talk about their partners in past tense? Ever notice how whenever people get new partners, they always compare them to previous ones, never fully appreciating said current partners?
Children whom physically or behaviorally resemble a parent/guardian are often subject to wrath of disgruntled adults whom were ex-partners of said parent. Either by single parents or family friend whom had romantic relation of said parent
>>701397Most of our biggest psychos are often plain Janes.
The girls who dress and act slutty online are often wannabes.
As Juice World says in his song "Lucid Dreams":
>You was made out of plastic (FAKE)>Who knew evil girls had the prettiest faceI guarantee you that alot of boomer males who we accuse of misogyny they may have had good reason because back before alt fashion, when girls were expected to present themselves more plainly, they could easily hide their vices. If you look at photos/videos of women from the 1960s, 70s, and early 80s you cannot imagine how any of these girls could be potentially toxic
>>701402>>701410Image board users are too loose/inconsistent in their manners
>>701419Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent humans in meat space.
Loli and shota aren't pedophilia.
Dating people much younger than you but are eighteen and up isn't pedophilia.
18-24 dating anyone over thirty is not pedophilia.
People who think it is are brain fried and deeply insecure about aging.
>>701437me and my friend can't agree if the age gap brainworms is a zoomer or millennial thing but I swear I didn't start seeing this shit until like 2018. is it just aging millennial women refusing to accept they're no longer prime real estate, or do young people actually think dating older people is wrong?
actually it doesn't even matter, the youngest zoomers are like 25 now, they'll be hitting that wall soon too.
>>701440It's mainly pushed by late prime age people, regardless of generation to cope with any delayed maturation.
Millennials and Gen Z want their juniors to be less worldly/autonomous.
Adults complain about society being youth oriented but then will actively infantilise young people out of "concern".
Then said elders will accuse the youth of arrested development.
Innocence or maturity?
You cannot have both.
>>701444>Also, I'm in my 30's and most women(and men) in my age group haven't really matured past their 20's unless they're married. You can immediately tell when someone's idea of a "good weekend" hasn't changed since collegeMost people whom are married with kids aren't really as mature as they think.
Also, most "good weekend" incidents seem to be more semi-rich boomers than actual college students.
In fact I would say college students nowadays don't really do as much of that. We are too busy Netflix and chilling.
I find it funny that people think nightclubs are immature yet bare are seen as proper adult entertainment.
>>701445Hes probably had a long history of semi delinquency that he doesnt really regret but he doesn't want to flung back in his face
And he probably has some serious vices he's hiding
Also, isnt it late to have kid in your forties?
>>701451Can you provide evidence?
Because theres most of people who like Loli and shota have no sexual.attractiom to children.
It's just romanticizing opportunities for romance in their own childhood
You sound like a typi al 4chan poster.
>>701246>NTA but that's an ignorant assumption to make. How do you know it only appeals to gays and not women?Life experience. Last thread. I'm sure most of the guys he/you post are literally fucking gay.
>>701246>Define "masculine" as a physiognomical aspect.And you no a lot of women go ga-ga over is not what they're actually attracted to IRL. Women also will go ga ga saying stupid shit about how hot this or that woman is, but most of them aren't actually lezzing out in real life at all. Not even "experimenting" or anything. Just because they go overboard with some praise about how this beautiful this woman or that lady boy is, doesn't mean they actually date or fuck ladyboys or women. You guys need to get offline and back into IRL.
>>701466>You accuse posters of homosexuality, but like, big hairy powerlifter looking dudes are not sex symbols among women, but gay men.I accuse him because he/you spam the thread with these images. You don't even write an accompanying text half the time. I posted one set of images to answer the retarded question:
>What is a masculine?I'm not big into football, and I have his face seared into my brain from the Pat Tillman story, so he just jumped into my head as an example of what a very masculine and also very beautiful/pretty guy looks like, he could/would be maybe one of those twinks posted if he wasn't into sports and shit and was instead into taking slut photos for instagram like a woman.
and in IRL. Women want a man who is respected by other men. You can't look weak in front of another man, that's one of the biggest turn offs for women.
>>701468I havent seen Taylor Swift fans talking much about how they want to fuck her. But I can go to instagram account of one of those pretty boys you claim appeal only to homosexuals and comments will be full of women doing precisely that.
>inb4 not real lifeYou can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
>>701475
>You can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
How young are we talking dude? They call things boy bands and teeny bopper music. Like are you trying to pickup preteens?
>inb4 not real life
>You can look up some dating app demonstrations, magazine polls, or even scientific papers on what women find sexually desirable, specifically young attractive women (if you want to argue polish truck driver phenotype appeals to 45 year olds, then sure, whatever).
Alright bro, believe what you want.
<big hairy powerlifter looking dudes are not sex symbols among women,
Like I suppose they say Prince was a "sex symbol." But where have you ever seen 5'4 midgets in stockings cleaning up with women.
I really don't know how to further explain real life to you because you refuse to interact with it.
But moving on.
Why do you spam the threads with these images of twinks taking slut photos? Why can't you answer that part?
>>701478>But where have you ever seen 5'4 midgets in stockings cleaning up with women.I didnt, nobody claims otherwise, height is universally attractive among women. Even women who are into famished tender skinned twins like them tall.
>images of twinks taking slut photos? With rare exceptions, images posted do not feature twinks, but very much masculine hunks build like Olympic athletes. Wide shoulders, giant pecks, chiselled abs, bulging biceps, veiny forearms. Its just that your idea of masculinity seems to be shaped by watching too many 80s action movies, so now you think anything short of prime Arnold is unmasculine.
>>701485>I didnt, nobody claims otherwise, height is universally attractive among women. Even women who are into famished tender skinned twins like them tall.So I'm saying, what is a "sex symbol" is largely irrelevant when we're talking about general preference.
>>701485>With rare exceptions, images posted do not feature twinks, but very much masculine hunks build like Olympic athletes. Wide shoulders, giant pecks, chiselled abs, bulging biceps, veiny forearms. Its just that your idea of masculinity seems to be shaped by watching too many 80s action movies, so now you think anything short of prime Arnold is unmasculine.No you post pictures of obvious homosexuals. And you are also an obvious homosexual and why do you refuse to answer:
>Why do you spam the threads with these images of twinks taking slut photos? Why can't you answer that part?What is the porpoise?
>>701461Umm wrong.
>>701457So you think men who don't look like muscular behemoths are low T men who appeal to homosexuals?
>>701481Apparently you never interact with women IRL. Boy band musicians are ogled after by post pubescent females as well.
>>701487Methinks you're a troll
>>701478Prince was a real looker. He was a basketball ball player and a musician. That's why he could get women.
He's a sex symbol because of his looks
>>701481Now this is bullshit copium.
Preteen girls are not really afraid of finding things they like fully sexy. And apparently you never ever visited Tumblr or Archive Of Our Own
You sound like some 1980s/90s jock
>>701573I hate to quote that meme but "Are you literally me"? Everything you said is exactly how my life went so far.
Tbh, romantic love isn't automatic guarantee for everyone
>>701702Sorry but I don't speak auto-misandry
>>701670Women have agency but they don't like responsibility.
That's why most girl bosses whenever they hit a problem, they immediately look for their male associates to help them out despite talking shit about men as incompetent leaders.
>>701704Perhaps but then if you don't ask permission she may accuse you of sexual predation.
Damned if you, damned if you don't
This is why coomers are smart.
Only deal with women platonically
>>701711>Perhaps but then if you don't ask permission she may accuse you of sexual predation.It unironically doesn't matter, if she has no proof the government doesnt care. If there's no legal repercussions then all you gotta do is block her on all socials and move on with your life.
Ask yourself, would you rather die a virgin or be mildly embarrassed by some crazy woman you'll probably never meet again?
>>701750Evidence or bullshit.
And can we please stop reducing male value to sexual reproduction?
I guarantee if only one-fifth of the male population got to fuck, then that means females weren't all valued either for procreation
>>701753>And can we please stop reducing male value to sexual reproduction?That's not something "we" are doing but something women and the society you exist in do all on their own. It really doesn't matter if incels "find their own happiness" or not. In fact, that's what normies want you to do: retreat into your basement and abandon dating entirely so they don't have to exist around you anymore.
>I guarantee if only one-fifth of the male population got to fuck, then that means females weren't all valued either for procreationThere's a pretty basic biological issue you're ignoring here: a man can impregnate multiple women in a short timespan, while a woman is inevitably limited by the downtime inbetween pregnancies. powerful men inevitably seek to impregnate as many (different) women as possible to maximize his descendants. not really the case for women.
>>701759>>701760>>701762Again this is some copiun. Even if one man can impregnate multiple women, you're forgetting that women can have issues too.
If only one fifth of all men fucked, that doesnt mean that vast majority of women fucked.
This mentality you guys have is very shallow.
>That's not something "we" are doing but something women and the society you exist in do all on their own. You guys talk more about sex than any normie space I've ever been on.
>It really doesn't matter if incels "find their own happiness" or not. In fact, that's what normies want you to do: retreat into your basement and abandon dating entirely so they don't have to exist around you anymore.Now this is sounding like retarded schizo bs.
This is persecution complex that we condemn rightoids for.
>>701759>How does that make any sense? It is just the same guys with multiple female partners. Humans don't have much genetic diversity, because of that and a genetic chokepoint in our history.Your theory doesn't make sense. One guy having multiple female partners doesn't mean vast majority of women were taken. You're forgetting that women can be born infertile or die in pregnancy.
You're also forgetting that women can be rejected for lacking any tits or hips to rear children with.
>>701808Also "humans don't have much genetic diversity" because genetic diversity in general has a limit for any and all species.
Genes are not like universal lego structures that can be swapped out on a whim.
Even in perfect conditions, there are limits before hereditary disorders start happening
Unique IPs: 202