What is the leftypol stance on pitbulls? Personally i think they’re dangerous and should stop being bred
I don’t understand how pit mommies can say “oh they’re so sweet and caring, you’re more likely to be killed by x than a pittie” when they were bred to be violent and aggressive
Plus they’re fucking ugly as sin
>>697552>>697539Isnt it because humans would aggravate them?
Starve them and hit them to make them more dangerous for dog fights?
>>697560Well.
Here's the thing.
I don't hate dogs. I like them.
What I hate is the human instinct to objectify them as toy gods.
Dogs suffer more from domestic living then if they were wild.
Constant forced selective breeding, neutering/spaying, being put on leashes and in cages, not allowed to freely roam to find spaces to do your business, it fucks up dogs.
I wish anti-dog cultural enthusiasts would stop blainithe dogs. Blame the humans.
Dogs never asked to be caged
Dogs never asked to be filled up
Humans do all that to them.
Why do you think dogs are always so feisty at the pet salons? Humans are treating them like toys.
>>697616I've said the same thing but people think this is unethical.
Yet they wanna put restrictions on curriculum.
>>697619Pet ownership taxation.
Just like how countries used to have bachelor taxes.
>>697565>What I hate is objectifying themAs always, the primary contradiction is bourgeois class society. You can breed all the friendly benevolent mutts you want…but only if you abolish the eugenicist settler territorial society that produces such nazi attack dogs, like that movie by Sam Fuller
Until we achieve liberation, we are like a monkey in a zoo who does nothing but screech about your fellow enslaved beasts being nice, or being mean to us inside the prison walls. Forget about dogs, you need to leave your prison! GET OUT!
>>697658>the fact of the matter is that not everyone is going to be bueno with having to fucking register to be a parent. The solution is education from the ground-up, encouraging nonfuckery from the ground up, from cradle to grave implementing steps to eventually reach the goals you want from licensing parenthood. Fuckass control freak.Parents are the ultimate control freak, worse than any centralized authority.
That's why I suggest mandatory licensing for parenthood.
Most parents think of their kids as biological trophies that they can warp/castrate in any way they like.
Especially with religious parents, you're not allowed to say no to their faith if you're their offspring.
They will beat you and curse you for doing so.
>>697961Idk about german shepherds, but rottweilers are pretty bad too and should probably stop being bred
Are there any cases of german shepherds attacking people unprovoked?
>>697961This.
Don't forget bloodhounds
>>697896Bruh is this even coherent?
Why do you guys always wanna make everything into "this is low-key racism/misogyny"?
No, cynophobia is a real thing.
And while the Reddit crowd is rabid, there are more staunch defenders of violent dog breeds on the basis of "they're dogs, they can do no wrong".
Dog worship is deeply ingrained in out society so much that fear/dislike of dogs is often treated as a criminal trait. Literally.
There are people who say that anyone who dislikes dogs is a sociopath/serial killer.
Yet a lot of our prominent madman were good with dogs.
Charles Manson and Adolf Hitler for example.
>>697981I don't know man, not sure I'd call childrearing an industry, but maybe it's different where you are from.
Personally I do see some merit in that argument, but I'm of the school of thought that the issue is more tied to our mode of production and how that create a warped idea of what a family is as an institution. I really do believe in the proverb 'you need a village to raise a child', and as it stands, the standard family 'unit' is isolated and strained, which creates all sort of issues that the upper strata can circumvent by outsourcing raising children, which in turn can create a whole other set of problems.
Either way, I don't believe that the answer is state mandated abortions for people who haven't got a baby certificate, and I do think your view on the general parent is dogmatic lol. But I don't think the discussion your proposal begets is without merit tho
>>698000>Personally I do see some merit in that argument, but I'm of the school of thought that the issue is more tied to our mode of production and how that create a warped idea of what a family is as an institution. That's fair, but I still believe that parenting is too often treated like an automatic grant for adulthood.
>I really do believe in the proverb 'you need a village to raise a child', and as it stands, the standard family 'unit' is isolated and strained, which creates all sort of issues that the upper strata can circumvent by outsourcing raising children, which in turn can create a whole other set of problems.Funny thing is, "It takes a village to raise a child" is one of the few proverbs that actually have merit in reality. But, it's often just a platitude that's repeated by adults to sound profound.
They probably don't even really bother to think about what it really means.
Most adults treat kids based on consanguinity and pop-cultural commonalities, not as individuals.
>>698022It's not just whites.
Blacks and Hispanics are dog worshippers as well
There's also other ethnocultyrea that do pamper dogs, although not the same way Occidental folk do.
>>698042It's white people whom are adopting pit bulls that then maul their own kids. If any white people are complaining about out bulls, it's due to their fellow white neighbor.
Thus idea that anti-pit bull sentiment is racist against blacks is just hogwash.
>>698168YOU
JUST
FUCKING
KNOW
>>698222>Because you banged a pit bull?i can see how you might come to that conclusion, but no
it was a guy and probably a golden retriever at that
>>698045>It's white people whom are adopting pit bulls that then maul their own kids. If any white people are complaining about out bulls, it's due to their fellow white neighbor.>Thus idea that anti-pit bull sentiment is racist against blacks is just hogwash.I only know one white family that owned pit bulls, the dozens I met outside that were not with black families. And neither of our anecdotal experience touches on the actual cultural identity politics at play here, and I know that you know that. You're bullshitting me.
>>698046Decent joke, but I know plenty of white folks with very close black friends who are still racist as hell. Is your bull "one of the good ones"
>>697985cynophobia isn’t a bad thing obvs. i’m just tired of speciesists and ageists using their fear as an excuse to seclude others even further. doesn’t mean i’m not tired of westerners buying dogs an excuse to get away with everything because i am
>Bruh is this even coherent?Why do you guys always wanna make everything into "this is low-key racism/misogyny"?
because there are other forms of bigoted undertones in everything under our current society including hating dogs. everything thing is political, so is owning dogs, and hating dogs. nothing is ethical under our western and or american society at least as of current. if you have a problem with that then your problem i guess
>>698176pet is such a cringe term. just use companion instead. and just like children, the only reason why pets are seen as “terrible”, is because they’re property. so therefore they’re gonna be treated like objects and “trained”/groomed or abused to hurt other people
>>698118hello another fellow zoophile
>>698270best dog breed tbh i really want one in the future
>>698489>because there are other forms of bigoted undertones in everything under our current society including hating dogs. everything thing is political, so is owning dogs, and hating dogs.To a certain extent, politics is everything. Hell, I would even say that religion is more political than spiritual
>nothing is ethical under our western and or american society at least as of current. if you have a problem with that then your problem i guessThat's why I say we need a reset. It's why Im glad less humans are procreating. We have too many dysfunctionals running about.
>>698436No.Dogs are cute. They're just socially abused by humans. They would be better off if they were autonomous.
>>698493>pet is such a cringe term. just use companion instead. and just like children, the only reason why pets are seen as “terrible”, is because they’re property. so therefore they’re gonna be treated like objects and “trained”/groomed or abused to hurt other peopleDomestic animals and children are treated like sentient toys. Also, alot of people refer to their domestic animal companion as their "fur baby" nowadays
IDC about the terminology as much as the implications of it. Dogs are forced to wear clothes and wear sunglasses and they they don't like it.
I hate how people wanna treat their dogs as fashion puppets. The dogs don't like it
>>701790>>701791>>701785There are species of animals where the female is the sole aggressor
You're also forgetting that males are the default sex of pet dogs anyway and they're often the most abused for dogfighting.
>>701795ChatGPT can function as a search engine, not just LLM.
May as well puke at Google
>>701813>You're also forgetting that males are the default sex of pet dogs anywaywhat
an equal number of male and female dogs are born
>>701853This. Dogs have suffered from hyper-exckusive artificial selection and "obedience training" for far too long.
Humans are worried about robots or aliens taking over the world? Thats the least likely scenario.
The real problem we should be worried about are dog uprisings
>>701861I think I should clarify:
Methinks the reason why pit bull males are more aggressive is because they're the ones most likely to be abused for animal fights.
Females are probably kept as breeding factories.
>>701858Nah.
Just put leashes on Karens.
>>702068cringe
>>701867i hope a dog mauls you to death
Unique IPs: 70