/siberia/ - Off-topic

>Saddam based

How fucking old are you? No, he was a shitty dude. A tyrant. I don't think even the most backwards and extremist "left" people here could find anything to admire in Hussein.
Why do you use the word "based" to mean good or cool or whatever anyway? It's chuddy and lame like something a magafag would say.

No I think he was pretty bad, still somehow morally superior to every us president but still bad. He was originally a CIA asset but he had some weird type of Arab Nationalist-Socialism and he didn’t deliver of the last part as well as the first. He did some good in the form of Women’s Rights, health care, and education but he did a lot of bad in the form of gassing Kurds and invading neighboring countries at the will of the US. But no matter how bad he was America should not have invaded Iraq and America literally made him look good in comparison.

>>723682
they actually do, MLs specifically

>>723674
>social democrat
>despotic leader
Sounds like fascism to me.

No he was not. Just because Hyper Hitler (the burger state) thought watered down Hitler wasn't right wing enough doesn't make him based.

>>723688
>gassing Kurds
It's made up

>>723674
Saddam did absolutely nothing wrong and only racist arabophobic brainwashed by zionist propaganda think otherwise

>>723715
>Its made up

No its not, the Halabja massacre definitely happened, just because someone made some admirable achievements in advancing women’s rights, improving healthcare and education, and nationalizing the extraction industry does not mean that the bad things he also did magically disappear.

>>723723
Why am I the only one who has a reasonable take on this guy

>>723723
>advancing women’s rights, improving healthcare and education, and nationalizing the extraction industry
So hes like a Nordic welfare state enjoyer with some sprinkles of ethnic genocide?

Not? Not on what?

I'm the Scatman
bi babba babappo

>>723728
aka a nordic welfare state

Billions must watch