/siberia/ - Off-topic

Yes to all

Sociopathy is cool
Sadism is cool
None of those people are cool, sorry.

>>724176
No. You can't be a socialist if you're anti-social. You're not valid, and ideally people exhibiting your traits would be sent to re-education camps and be forcefed empathy pills, because you will betray the revolution the nanosecond it goes slightly against your personal best interest.

>>724220
Don't worry, I'm a communist.

>>724230
Only as long as it benefits you or makes you feel special.

>>724240
Are you really assmad that people were born different than you? That some people don't feel the same things as you?

Those people are normal, we are all partaking in and taking advantage of the system we live in, abstracting away the suffering our treats depend on, they are just bigger cogs than us

>>724247
Not caring about the suffering of others is not a valid little personality quirk, it's a fatal character flaw. Deal with it.

>>724258
Yup, you are assmad.

Ngl those tongues sticking out make me a bit aroused.
I wonder if they know how to give good head

bourgeois puppet
bourgeois puppet (and also retarded)
bourgeois puppet
bourgeois puppet (did 9/11)
bourgeois puppet (and also Hitler)
bourgeois puppet
bourgeois
bourgeois
bourgeois

I consider Netanyahu to be of the same moral level as someone like Albert Fish, Peter Scully, or Vlad the impaler at this point.

>>724366
Vlad the impaler was based and historically progressive

>>724174
Its more like power and status will turn anyone into having sociopathic tendencies including you OP.

>>724455
It's more like everyone already has sociopathic tendencies including you anon, and only those who exploit those tendencies will succeed in gaining power and status.

>>724465
IMAX 8k projection

>>724483
I don't think you know what projection means, Anon. I have no issue and no shame in confronting my own sociopathy.

>>724465
I think we’re both right. Studies suggest that personality does change, but it also makes sense that more ruthless people tend to rise higher in the hierarchy.

>>724484
>I have no issue and no shame in confronting my own sociopathy.

This is a lie. You're open about it, which doesn't mean you're willing to confront it. What you meant to say is that you have no shame about your sociopathy and that you think it's perfectly healthy to not care about the suffering of others.

>>724490
When did everybody become so ableist against us poor sociopaths? It's not fair.

>>724493
ok, now u'r just baiting

>>724496
Your weird obsession with moralising sociopathy is not worth taking seriously

>>724498
I just caught you on a lie (about you "confronting" your sociopathy), then you moved on as if it was nothing and now you're lying again to save face. Everyone can see through your deception and you're destined to failure and misery if you don't actually start facing your sociopathy.

>>724502
It seems we have completely different ideas of what "confrontation" means
>moved on as if it was nothing
I don't mean to sound brusque, but that was because it is.
>Everyone can see through your deception and you're destined to failure and misery if you don't actually start facing your sociopathy.
Okay, ignoring your melodramatic tone, I'll bite. Would you elaborate on that point if you don't mind?

>>724512
Any reasonable person in this context would assume that confrontation means to confront – to oppose your sociopathy in search of improvement, rather than to just acknowledge your sociopathy. You're trying to deceive again, and I have to wonder if you do this on purpose or if you just can't help it since you do it constantly.

>Would you elaborate on that point if you don't mind?
Yes. Anyone with a brain can eventually see that you're full of shit. And when they do, they will stop trusting you. You might get financial success one day out of using vulnerable people, but you'll end up alone and empty regardless of any financial success. Look at Elon Musk and how miserable he is despite having everything. He has no one, because he values no one, he only has things.

>>724249
trvth nvke

>>724528
>improvement
You presuppose that sociopathy is something to be improved upon, that it is an ailment in need of treatment, until you actually articulate why that is, I have no reason to trust you.
>You're trying to deceive again
I will admit that I am playing dumb, but only so far as to bring myself down to your level.
>Anyone with a brain
Again, a meaningless appeal to common sense. You do this a lot.
>they will stop trusting you
Why should I care? I don't trust you, you are an anonymous imageboard user. You keep inventing these grandiose scenarios where I am at the heart of all evil, like it's really childish.
>You might get financial success one day out of using vulnerable people
I don't want "financial success"
>end up alone and empty regardless
Well, I am already alone and very much content with that fact, as for "empty" the only thing empty here are your emotional platitudes.
>Look at Elon Musk and how miserable he is
Are you seriously implying that I, anonymous imageboard user, am in any way comparable to Elon Musk? You keep making these massive leaps and bounds in logic to demonize me, for what reason? Why? Why are you doing this to me? I don't actually want an answer from you, I want you to ask this of yourself.
To restate: >>724498
>Your weird obsession with moralising sociopathy is not worth taking seriously

>>724536
>You presuppose that sociopathy is something to be improved upon, that it is an ailment in need of treatment

Did you not do any research at all? You suggest that it's just a harmless personality quirk, when it's the overwhelming consensus in psychology and psychiatry that sociopathy (ASPD) is fundamentally harmful. Saying otherwise is comparable to saying that the earth is flat.

>, until you actually articulate why that is, I have no reason to trust you.

I want you to look it up and then use your insufferable debatebro brain to figure it out. It will take mere seconds if you're as smart as you're posturing to be. I'm not wasting my time with you any further.

>>724563
>You suggest that it's just a harmless personality quirk
I didn't say that, dumbass, read my fucking posts correctly.

>>724567
Read your own posts correctly, bitch. You strongly suggested it.

>>724569
Did not.

>>724465
First sentence was correct

theyre like fucking mob bosses, they just murder anyone who gets in their way ruthlessly. remember the openai whistleblower? kid was obviously murdered, but crooked cops claimed it was a suicide