[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1762632590443.png (439.54 KB, 1200x825, Untitled1.png)

 

What are some pop culture icons that are worshiped and adored despite being totally chomo-coded?


picrel

File: 1762633048232.png (162.53 KB, 1920x1088, ClipboardImage.png)

Michael Jackson but he probably didn't do it

oh look it’s the infamous map/pedo flag. glad to see paraphilies being represented

>>724199
He definitely did

>>724199
I don't believe he did any molesting, but there is probably no person more molester coded who didn't actually molest anybody.
>>724207
No evidence?

>>724212
I think its obvious he was a pedo (even if he didn't molest anyone) and that he surrounded himself with yes-men who wouldn't tell him that what he was doing wasn't normal.

>>724206
It's a good flag tbh, I only found out about it because of some cunny meme

>>724197
Not really "coded" when the movies themselves outright state he's an actual child molester

>>724311

depends on the iteration but i could be wrong

>>724275

unfortunately normies who are queer on the internet (no hate on the queer community) think maps/pedos only made it cause they wanted to enter the lgbtq+ community when it’s just a hoax started by rightoids both on and outside of 4chan. most maps/pedos aren’t interested for their paraphilia to be seen as a label or apart of the community nor are they interested in acting on their attraction

>>724424
rightiwingers obviously inflate it, but pedophiles did try to join LGBT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
they were rejected by most

>>724197
>despite being totally chomo-coded?
Kys

>>724197
Whoever created lazytown was totally a chomo

>>724430
They were only rejected by most after a decent amount of pressure.
>>724424
Was Harry Hay a 4chan psyop? Lol

>>724311
Only the reboot makes him explicitly a molester, the original films just heavily imply it, as it was originally intended but toned down, because child rape is just too far for horror movies, but child murder is just fine lmao.
>when it’s just a hoax started by rightoids both on and outside of 4chan.
I looked ito this, and there is a snopes article that traces the creation of the flag itself to some genuine NOMAPS on tumblr, but the flag only got traction as it was appropriated for right-wing false-flags. (And I found out about it by lolicons using the flag ironically in memes ig)
>>724434
QRD?

>>724212
would you have let your kid stay in michael's bedroom?

>>724451
Still no evidence?

>>724456
and theres literally no purported evidence that jeffrey epstein trafficked prostitutes to anybody either. ghislaine maxwell denied a "client list" exists.

>>724461
Damn, you are almost getting somewhere… keep researching.

>>724430

oh yeah i almost forgot about that. i learned about it on mastodon. i remembered when i also saw an image of a man whose also a pedo trying to advocate for pedophilia as well by protesting alongside other queer protesters as well on fedi

File: 1762709451635.jpg (293.22 KB, 2000x1697, GettyImages-72608143.jpg)

>>724463
you appear purposefully obtuse:
OJ simpson was judged innocent of the murder of nicole simpson, despite everybody in the US knowing that he was guilty, despite whatever purported evidence was given in his favour (what is later admitted in his pseudo-confession: "if i did it"). similarly, when ghislaine maxwell or michael jackson deny their crimes its obvious to anyone with sense that theyre guilty. you cant "prove" it but you "know" it. i'll ask you plainly:

did OJ simpson kill nicole?

>>724466
>despite everybody in the US knowing that he was guilty
<Many people are saying it
>its obvious to anyone with sense that theyre guilty
<It's just common sense
>you cant "prove" it
I know, that's why I don't "believe" it. If it happened than it must have happened objectively, independent of whether or not I "believe" it. If it did not happen, than it did not happen, and no amount of "just knowing" it happened will make it have happened.

The facts of the matter are: you have no evidence to support your belief, it is completely a priori

>>724468
>OJ simpson is not guilty (ergo he is innocent)
youre such a coward
keep defending pedos

>>724469
>ergo he is innocent
Something I never said, nor even implied.
>keep defending pedos
Something I never did, not even implicitly.

Keep being retarded.

>>724470
>Something I never said, nor even implied.
if you cant say he's guilty then you are in fact saying that he is innocent. its either one or the other - you realise this, right?
>Something I never did, not even implicitly.
wacko jacko was a pedo.
>retarded
youre the one utterly confused about epistemology by applying radical scepticism to everything:
>hi my name's john
<uh, how can i know your name is john?
>here's my ID
<well, maybe you faked your ID…
etc.
you simply dont believe in truth or knowledge, otherwise you would just openly say OJ is innocent since it was "proven" in a court of law, no?

>>724474
>>724474
>its either one or the other
This is something I rather explicitly stated here: >>724468
>If it happened than it must have happened objectively, independent of whether or not I "believe" it. If it did not happen, than it did not happen, and no amount of "just knowing" it happened will make it have happened.

>wacko jacko was a pedo.

Ad hominem, no evidence, no argument.
>youre the one utterly confused about epistemology by applying radical scepticism to everything:
Strawman
>otherwise you would just openly say OJ is innocent since it was "proven" in a court of law
I don't believe in anything a "court of law" says, that doesn't mean I necessarily believe in the exact opposite you nitwit, I am declaring my ignorance on the matter very clearly, I do not know for certain. And I don't have any reason to trust you either. Is that so hard to understand?

>>724477
>i dont believe in anything…
at least youre being honest now.

>>724212
>I don't believe he did any molesting, but there is probably no person more molester coded who didn't actually molest anybody.
truthnuky

File: 1762716707056.png (124.51 KB, 1500x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

>>724506
What about Woody Allen? I remember some article a while back questioning the allegations that he did stuff to his daughter. Although marrying his wife's adopted daughter was pretty sus.

>>724199
Actually MJ was a heavenly being sent by God, so he's all smooth down there and couldn't have done it.

I don't see the issue at all. Villains should be evil and repugnant and Freddy does the job great.

>>724206
>>724275
>>724424
>>724446
>proud pedophiles enter the chat

>>724767
But Freddy is also seriously cool and beloeved unironically, like he's just a really funny and cool guy

>>724466
OJ wasn't a diddenbludden tho. He was a (accused) murdermaxxer, which is comparatively more admirable.

>>724834
Can you type like a normal person please?


Unique IPs: 20

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]