[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1763083016420.png (930.93 KB, 1042x735, ClipboardImage.png)

 

What's your favourite athropod?

Mine is the hummingbird moth because it is so cute and has interesting behaviours, it migrates a long distance. I thought one in my garden was a hummingbird when I was growing up, though apparently hummingbirds don't exist in the old world, so if you think you saw one it actually is this cute insect :3

File: 1763084518192.png (479.59 KB, 640x426, muh beauty of nature.png)

Whatever arthropod suffers the least, which is probably the one with the least developed nervous system. If insects can suffer, it is our moral duty to destroy the ecosystem in order to prevent as many insects and other lifeforms that can suffer from being born.

https://benthams.substack.com/p/thinking-insect-suffering-is-the

>I think insect suffering is the worst thing in the world by far. I know it sounds weird! But please hear me out—ideally with an open mind!

>Many views seem intuitive but only because of bias. To southern slave-owners, the permissibility of slavery was intuitive. But this was only as a result of bias and a profound failure of empathy. They only considered things from their own perspectives, never thinking about what it would be like to be a tormented and subjugated slave. Had they done so, they’d have correctly judged slavery to be the abomination it was.
>I think the same thing is true about insect suffering. People have the strong intuition that it doesn’t matter at all. But when one really reflects, this turns out to be for unreliable and superficial reasons. Insect suffering is genuinely important, and we only neglect it because of bias and irrationality. I think there are four considerations which when considered collectively make vivid the significance of the 10^18 insects presently suffering.

>>726085
I agree strongly that insect suffering matters, but your conclusion is completely wrong. Wiping life out is worse than suffering, because even an awful life is better than death, which is oblivion. And anyway, how can you know that insects are happy or not, or that they think life is worth living or not? Surely they experience positive emotions or stimuli when they find food or a mate, or if they are social, work for the group. Even if their lives are short and likely to end in awful death, that does not mean their lives are meaningless.

I actually am writing a novella on this subject (it is not very well written to be honest, I am just writing whatever and not drafting). I will link it in a moment.

Instead of this nihilism that does not help anyone or the insects you claim to care about, we can take practical steps to improve quality of life for all complex animals. This will have to take place probably after socialism has won and the transition to communism has started, so instead of thinking of how to kill off life, if you really care you should be helping revolutionary organising.

>>726085
Wrong. Kill all mosKKKitos and bedbugSS.

File: 1763088009966.jpg (714.05 KB, 1167x3591, animal biomass.jpg)

>>726086
>And anyway, how can you know that insects are happy or not, or that they think life is worth living or not? Surely they experience positive emotions or stimuli when they find food or a mate, or if they are social, work for the group.
Simon Knutsson did an analysis on this and came to the conclusion that the lives of insects are most likely terrible.

https://www.simonknutsson.com/how-good-or-bad-is-the-life-of-an-insect

>If I died and was offered to be born again as an insect or cease to exist, I would definitely choose not to exist. This essay focuses on the quality of life of honey bees because they are well-studied, and on what have been suggested to be the most numerous insects: springtails, ants, termites, and aquatic insects such as mayflies and midges (although some sources no longer classify springtails as insects). There is enormous inequality among the fates of insects. Some die very young, either as larvae, pupae, or just after having emerged from the pupa stage as adults, and it is difficult to see how most such lives can be good on balance. Death often seems very painful so, because their lives are so short, they do not include enough positive wellbeing to compensate their suffering. On the other hand, successful honey bee queens can live for years while being fed, protected, and taken care of by others. In general, though, honey bees live short lives. The vast majority of them are workers who live on average only about 15–38 days as adults during summer. Mayflies and some midges have even shorter adult lives—they never eat, and they die within a few days. Ants and other kinds of insects live longer. This is probably fortunate from a population perspective, since it means fewer deaths per unit of time, although it may not be better for any individual to live longer.

>>726085
>>726092
What do you think? It is only the first two chapters, and it is not well written by any means since I don't care enough to draft it properly, but rather a writing exercise.

https://profoundlystrawberry4e3c1c7b0a-fcumv.wordpress.com/butterfly-project/

I don't know much about arthropods to select a favourite, but if we are talking about moths, I saw a lime hawk-moth last year and it was beautiful.

>>726092
I don't think this person understand what it means to cease to exist. Theirs is a fundamentally religious argument that assumes that there is some point after the end of life where you can make a balance of all the suffering and happiness to see if life was worth living or not. But if one does not exist anymore, it cannot matter to them if they had a good or a bad life at all.


>>726152
Historical materialist analysis on ant class system?

>>726085
Undialectical. Life is an inevitable product of chemistry. Any attempt to eliminate life would only be rolling back something that will re-emerge later.

>>726085
i am the opposite. non sentients should be made to feel and suffer and feel everything. give robots consciousness NOW and wage war on the biological

>>726346
Thats just evil.

>>726346
Why make them suffer? Obviously we should turn everything into the universe into living matter but we should make them happy instead of sad.

>>726381
rage is the only thing i will contribute. i will leave a backend so other emotions can be inserted

>>726073
Mosquitos because they have the highest kill count of h*mans

>>726237
Ants do not reach full communism through theory. Their material reality pushes them there. Their farms and collective labor form the core of survival so individual goals no longer matter. The colony works best when every ant acts as part of one living whole. The individual ant fades and the colony becomes one single classless organism driven only by work and survival.


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]