>animals were around for a long time before humans
<but when humans came around, animals slowly became livestock, or game
>humans were around for a long time before AI
<but when AI came around, humans slowly became livestock, or game
truke or puke?
We should consider more that AI may end up very alien to us, so we can‘t predict its behavior by projecting our behavior onto it. Also if anything AI would just wipe out humans for its own safety.
>>727260I think AI will most likely either exterminate all humans or enslave them for some arcane purpose this century.
aaaaw :3
i wanna get slaughtered by one of those if the us ever invades brazil
#deep
Metal Gear…
>>727261>>727363Nah, if sapient AI ever would end up taking over Earth, then only for creating infrastructure to launch itself into space and start building server rooms on the dark side of Mercury for its own habitation or something. If the AI is reasonable (and I think it would probably be), we can reason with it and allow/help it to peacefully leave our planet.
>>727260The original idea of Matrix was that the machines used humans for computation and not energy but it was deemed too complex for audiences. Beyond organic computers what use would humans be to a god-like AI?
>>727367Careful what you wish for.
>>727388I mean, you are only partially right. There are no strictly defined categories of living beings in nature (when was the moment when the first bird had hatched from the last dinosaur's egg?). Humans are partially animals… but we had also been for the last ~10K years at least evolving into a new form of life, unlike anything the Earth saw before.
>>727395Every other animal has been evolving for the same amount of time. They are all still taxxonomically animals. Being weird isn't on it's own enough to be a new kingdom.
>>727398>Every other animal has been evolving for the same amount of time.Wrong. There is no lifeform on Earth that had evolved to the insane degree Homo Sapiens had evolved over the course of even last 40K years (except maybe some species… enslaved by Homo Sapiens during this time).
I mean yeah, in a techno capitalist singularity that would be your exact position: biomass.
>>727395Is this what all Trots believe? Lmfao
>>727406No, I'm referring to your tacit reverence for human evolution, as if you are suggesting it makes humans special or something to that effect.
>>727407I mean, we ARE special. Assuming you don't believe in Silurians, we are the first lifeform in the 4.5 TY of life on Earth to succesfully reproduce not only genetically, but also intellectually and technologically. (E.g. Lenin's genes have died with him, but his ideas still survive, as the existence of this website can attest). Since the whole "life" thing is about reproduction, this is already serious enough ground to claim that humans are more than just animals and constitute a [so far] special category of life.
>>727415Bro, I can't. Please tell me you are memeing.
The earnest nature of your post - I can't do it man.
>>727400Change is change, they all evolved the same amount.
>>727260why would humans allow something they consciously create every aspect of the capability of doing that?
It was cool in sci fi but I never see it happening
we will win this thing when we invent portable EMT granades or fields that disable machines, just chuck em at the robots and watch them instantly die.
we might all get radiation poisoning but it will be worth it.
>>727415would you say animals that exhibit protocultural habits and tool use learned socially instead of by innate instinct fit the criteria for intellectual and technological reproduction?
Unique IPs: 15