Shouldn't foids and moids be happy? Foids have the power and moids get to neet.
>>727487>the atlanticamazing thread
>>727488kys
cope and seethe
>>727487>Shouldn't foids and moids be happy? Foids have the power and moids get to neet.Is somebody saying they're unhappy? People are just shocked that le tradition is being overturned due to changes in material circumstances.
Whoa holy shit that's crazy dude.
>>727501>>727501>Is somebody saying they're unhappy? From what I've seen, all we're getting is femcels and incels, and more people calling male sexuality misogyny
Somehow ops post is relevant. Let them marry the herps, and visa versa.
So every man that goes to college basically gets a harem?
>>727535I wish. Maybe other guys but not me then again I never tried.
>>727487>>727499>women are more likely to have degreesDegrees in what?
I see this as an absolute win for us golden retriever himbos
>>727499I really doubt this is true if you only look at the demographics of STEM subjects - I don't think this is going to make women more high-earning on average, as a lot of these aforementioned women with a Bachelor's are doing Arts or English or some other no-job-market degree.
>>727535No, us in engineering have a 6:1 male to female ratio.
femdom is the only ethical (harm reduction) form of heterosexuality
>finally finish my masters
<news come out that women actually prefer uneducated dumbasses
Of course.
>>727552the only ethical form of male is a weak domesticated soyboy who cannot fight back against his rightful high autism score matriarchal technocrat rulers
>>727551only if true femdom. without that pseud "gentle femdom" bullshit
>>727574Autism is less prevalent in women though
>>727598You are not into femdom, you just want a submissive woman who dont expects you to be dominant in return.
>>727548>this isnt true if you exclude all the datapoints for which it is We will need affirmative action for men by 2040
>>727499I think this is less "men falling behind" and more "men getting meme'd into not getting degrees and going into DUH TRADES". A lot of male-oriented online content is promoting that narrative, hence why it's affecting men and not women.
>>727499They have been saying this for years but they never bother to look at the fields that women study for.
Alot of women go for liberal arts or business majors which most will never get their proper career from
>>732280Women are going into trades as well.
Also what's so bad about wanting to go into trades?
It's been looked down upon for far too long.
>>727487College-education doesn't guarantee good prospects.
Also, not everyone is going to college for the same thing.
There's also a lot of affirmative action/DEI policies put in place.
>>727535depends on lesbian concentration among women, which prolly also increased
>>732280That narrative has existed for like three years at best, it was a direct reaction to the most recent downturn in the software job market.
TOTAL MOID DEATH
>>727600>gatekeeping your desire to be bruised and beatenWe all agree that you're the most sane one here anon, you don't have to say any more.
Genuinely what would men work shit paying jobs for in modern times? Girl bosses already making money even if usually not enough either. You're not having a good family with ran through career women which most of them are. They got no time and plenty of baggage. There is literally always other guys involved with these women sooner or later. They are caught fucking their coworkers or "work husbands" or bosses out of boredom or for profit. If you made extra coins your life would probably still be shit. It's a little late to be crying about life being wasted.
>>737217the most successful and ambitious women i know (stem phds, law school, med school) in their early-mid 20s let themselves get dragged down by men who won't get jobs or wash their asses
>>727487Foids will be happy if the dynamic gets worse, despite them being the "empathetic gender".
>>727551Shut up female
>>737224Between this and the post you're replying to it seems like most people of either sex are knowingly attaching themselves to shitty partners because they're desperate for any relationship whatsoever to cater to their fragile self-esteem and then when it goes wrong they decide that it's society's problem.
>>737230Maybe it is society's problem at this point
>>737232I mean yes because they're gonna make it so by engaging in random acts of terrorism and shit. So we must do the smart thing and kill everyone who's ever been in a bad relationship before they become violent.
>>737234We should just sterilize them instead and then let them be. Just sterilize everybody really
>>727487the average moid actually wants to be in control and be seen as a special princess moreso than even the biggest attention whore woman could ever be
just scroll through any porn niche and you will realize that
>>737230>>737224>>737287>>737217This is why ancient societies had people marry in their mid-late teens or early twenties at latest.
Our modernized liberalized society thinks relationships under age twenty five are unnecessary, toxic even.
It’s become normalized and sympathized for people to have excessive baggage and declining fertility to enter into marriage and have kids
Yet, the baggage from previous fuckups rears it’s ugly head and endocrinological
Contaminants from processed food, prescription drugs, recreational drugs, cosmetics, etc leech onto the kids.
The truth is, the only safe way to have emotionally and sexually intact partners over twenty five is to get them from a honest monastery or something.
>>737384Beg to differ. Both sexes have a toxic entitlement syndrome w when it comes to sex and romance
>>737224>the most successful and ambitious women i know (stem phds, law school, med school) in their early-mid 20s let themselves get dragged down by men who won't get jobs or wash their assesI personally don't care
the most ridiculous thing that americans believe is that education has anything to do with university degrees
>>739719That sounds funny. Maybe it's some kind of personal challenge that they take to prove that they're the ultimate girl boss. Or maybe they just find the guy to be fun and available since he won't have job he'll have time to be there for her and have the energy to do fun things.
>>739813what? muricans are more likely to be in the "I don't need no book learning I went to DA SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS and know COMMON SENSE" mindset, meanwhile practically all of asia including MENA basically thinks you are more valuable and worthy of respect if you have a university education even if it applies to specific degrees
>>739836>I don't need no book learning I went to DA SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS and know COMMON SENSE" mindset,that is not about the appearance of being educated but rather a working class pride sort of thing. it is in fact a rejection of education, usually as cope. the reason people do that is because when it comes to education, americans are more like what you described as asians and mena. here you will find it very difficult to get a white collar job that pays a decent salary if you're lacking a degree, even if it's just a liberal arts degree for basket weaving, you need one. women, as op have stated, believe that they are "dating down" if they date a man with no degree. america is a class society like any other and a degree or lacktherof is one of the defining features of whether you're working class or middle/upper. most people who go to university are not interested in education at all and it only serves as a vehicle to a higher salary cap for them.
>>739861>but honestly I don't feel like it.Whats wrong bro?
>>739896Engels didn't think that early societies were matriarchal, but matrilineal. Women hold symbolic legitimacy (i.e through rituals and affirming lineages, thats why there were so many female shamans in ancient cultures) but men still hold public offices due to how division of labour worked. People who think that ancient societies were matriarchal are rightoids who unironically believe in the Longhouse shit
>>739898Its also kinda ironic that chuds associated the advent of the bureaucratic state with matriarchy and the longhouse, when we know in fact that the bureaucracy emerged after patriarchy emerged because constant, all year round agricultural surplus removed society from cyclical rituals that are suitable for women. The bureaucracy is paternalistic and the fact that women are dominating the bureaucracy today isn't a sign of female advancement but liquidation of women into the capitalist default of masculinity
sorry to be that moid but this is just more "women are the primary victims of war" nonsense. women have it better in most metrics and yet men are still always the problem. when can we just accept that women are just assholes who view men as objects?
Unique IPs: 31