[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1763780947628.jpeg (37.89 KB, 447x447, images-40.jpeg)

 

What the hell was his problem?

File: 1763781121837.jpg (537.89 KB, 1439x2000, 5353521.jpg)


this is based actually

File: 1763781636287.jpeg (128.71 KB, 1199x146, IMG_2386.jpeg)

>>728203
As someone who likes Castro I always thought that he was too hard on Mao… but then again maybe he was right about this.

>>728203
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/condition-working-class/ch13.htm
<Condition of the Working Class in England, by Engels, 1845
<The Attitude of the Bourgeoisie Towards the Proletariat
>Prophecy is nowhere so easy as in England, where all the component elements of society are clearly defined and sharply separated. The revolution must come; it is already too late to bring about a peaceful solution; but it can be made more gently than that prophesied in the foregoing pages. This depends, however, more upon the development of the proletariat than upon that of the bourgeoisie. In proportion, as the proletariat absorbs socialistic and communistic elements, will the revolution diminish in bloodshed, revenge, and savagery. Communism stands, in principle, above the breach between bourgeoisie and proletariat, recognises only its historic significance for the present, but not its justification for the future: wishes, indeed, to bridge over this chasm, to do away with all class antagonisms Hence it recognises as justified, so long as the struggle exists, the exasperation of the proletariat towards its oppressors as a necessity, as the most important lever for a labour movement just beginning; but it goes beyond this exasperation, because Communism is a question of humanity and not of the workers alone. Besides, it does not occur to any Communist to wish to revenge himself upon individuals, or to believe that, in general, the single bourgeois can act otherwise, under existing circumstances, than he does act. English Socialism, i.e., Communism, rests directly upon the irresponsibility of the individual. Thus the more the English workers absorb communistic ideas, the more superfluous becomes their present bitterness, which, should it continue so violent as at present, could accomplish nothing; and the more their action against the bourgeoisie will lose its savage cruelty. If, indeed, it were possible to make the whole proletariat communistic before the war breaks out, the end would be very peaceful; but that is no longer possible, the time has gone by. Meanwhile, I think that before the outbreak of open, declared war of the poor against the rich, there will be enough intelligent comprehension of the social question among the proletariat, to enable the communistic party, with the help of events, to conquer the brutal element of the revolution and prevent a "Ninth Thermidor". In any case, the experience of the French will not have been undergone in vain, and most of the Chartist leaders are, moreover, already Communists. And as Communism stands above the strife between bourgeoisie and proletariat, it will be easier for the better elements of the bourgeoisie (which are, however, deplorably few, and can look for recruits only among the rising generation) to unite with it than with purely proletarian Chartism.

>>728209
You are wrong. The social fascist imperialists scammed everyone. In 1960, imperialist russia scammed China the final time

Cuba was controlled by the social fascists so cuba sided with them in sino soviet split. By sending excess gain to cuba, China would have only aided social fascist's imperialism and their control over cuba. It makes zero sense for Communist China to aid the hostile imperialists, so you are totally wrong.

he wasn't getting his balls DRAINED the day he wrote this

>>728213
Couldnt he do it himself?

>>728211
>You are wrong. The social fascist imperialists scammed everyone. In 1960, imperialist russia scammed China the final time

I was mostly joking, I do think that Fidel was too harsh on China until the collapse of the USSR. I mostly just posted that because Mao’s quote was objectively awful but I still think that the Sino-Soviet split was more nuanced. Although I think that it’s stupid to call the Soviet Union “Social-Fascist” they very much where a Social-Imperialist power that very much did cross the line from defending themselves from encirclement to trying to police the world. But at the Same time China’s actions during the Sino-Soviet split were also pretty bad such as the Cultural Revolution, personality cults, supporting Pol Pot, and invading Vietnam after they got rid of Pol Pot.


Unique IPs: 8
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /